The Minister and the $350,000 GIFT !

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by MrPVRd, Feb 19, 2006.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. She can take some Preparation H along, to soothe the after-effects of Big Guiseppe's midnight romps!

  2. Strange that this story should surface today, I have read about it in european papers as long as a year ago.

  3. Fcuking Neue Arnbeit antics make "Tory Sleaze" look like playground stuff. No difference between Chavs and Tony's Cronies. "Mortified" only because they got caught. Cnuts.
  4. Obviously not such an 'offshore tax expert' as he claims. Needs to fix consult with Lordy Lordy Archer to see what it is like for rich bstards in the nick. How to have his very own Bubba guards in the shower and that.
  5. It never fails to amaze me how so-called "brilliant" minds can be so downright stupid. Greed, perhaps.

    More sleaze for Bliar, and another layer of the onion peeled away.
  6. no one else noticed it was £350, not $350k.... quite a bit more, i think you'll agree.....
  7. Now can somebody jog my memory for me please. Wasn't one of main points that Neue Arbeit used in it's campaign to get itself elected all that time ago, that they were the party that was against sleeze? The put themselves forward on the moral high ground?

    Anyone got time to list all the scandals that have hit thier ministers? Now many times they held on to their place in the cabinet with the full support of Mr T BLiar until there was no option but to drop them like a hot potato? How many times the same ex-minister spent a minimum of time on the back benches before getting a place on the cabinet again?

    How many 'last chances' do they have to have? And I don't mean individuals, I mean the whole government? They errod our freedoms for 'our own benifit' while showing no morals at all themselves. Time for them to go.
  8. Labour..................socialists================communists! Don't do as I do just do as I say or else!
  9. Cherie Blair is releasing a book this week detailing the best way to sue the military amongst other things. Wonder if there will be a chapter on prosecuting bent politicians or bent lawyers? They all stink and the sooner we can stick them against a wall the better!
  10. He nees to ask Mandy Mandelson how you get off mortgage fraud charges.
  11. So, when do we get the next antedeluvian video of 'Troops beating Iraqi civilians' or simliar item?

    Be interesting to see how they try to wriggle out of this one... :roll:
  12. No doubt Mills and Jowell will be crying 'Tall Poppy Syndrome'. Talk about over-complicating the laundering of Mafia dirty money. Let him go to Italy be charged and do his time there first then get him back to UK and try him of breaches of UK law and jail him again. The inland revenue should go through his (and his wenches) whole life like a dose of salts. If they done it once then there are probably others. Every cent should be recovered then they should both be done for fraud.

    What a tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive.
  13. In the article one of Mills' friends states that Mills is cleverer than the rest of us and knows it. It is with this attitude that arrogant tw*ts normally get caught.
  14. Ok, take a picture of this...

    You turn around to your wife and say "Babes, we both earn a bit , I fancy taking out a massive mortgage , just north of 350K , what do you think?"

    I know the reaction I'd get 9 times out of 10 , and it would involve much shouting , calling my intelligence into question and a stint of stagging on on the sofa. If you doubt that , try it on with the long haired CO tonight, and see what reaction you get, no matter what you earn.

    But in this case, the missus smiles sweetly, says "Of course darling where do I sign?" . If the press is to be believed , allegedly the mortgage was allegedly errrr.... paid off in full some weeks later.

    The inquiry they wish to have , concerns abuse of ministerial priviledge I believe? If I got that wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me.

    So why is she being investigated for inadvertantly putting a tick in the wrong box (oooops Butterfingers) as opposed to the worst case scenario to get that out of the way first?