The Folly of a Nuclear Iran

Discussion in 'Multinational HQ' started by tomahawk6, Feb 18, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Not kidding, be afraid. sun block? SPF 10,000,000 anyone?

  2. Tomahawk, you are obsessed with Iran.
    Are you really George W Bush?
  3. No not obsessed. I think the entire issue of nuclear proliferation is a problem.
  4. And so it is. However, as long as the consequences of actually using a bucket of instant sunshine, something cheeky in a non-persistent nerve agent or a naughty litte disease on Western targets are clearly understood by everyone and as long as actual delivery of said items in a safe, reliable and accurate manner remains problematic, I would submit that there are plenty of other things to worry about ahead of that.[/b]
  5. How could he be? He served in the army. 8O Might be Rummy though......
  6. "Oh Rummy was a sailor lad!"
  7. Unfortunately one of the biggest drivers for nuclear (or WMD if you like) proliferation is the current US attitude to international relations. If a country has WMDs then the US treat it with a modicum of respect - in deeds if not in words. However, states without WMD just get told BOHICA. Are we going into NK to remove that murderous dictator and his WMD stash ? If Saddam had really had WMDs would we have gone in ?