one of the things I want to leave behind is a multilateralism ... to remove tyrants
Question for all: is there anything to draw from this? The BBC bloke on the news last light claims it's referring to Iran. If so, does this mean that GWB has decided NOT to do Op Iranian Freedom unilaterally, but to leave any UNILATERAL action to his successor? On the assumption (I know...) that any successor is less likely to choose that route, does this de facto give Israel the notice "it's your show to go it alone"?
Thoughts on a postcard. Zap