No it's not- the implementation of EU policy is what the EU demands of the nations within it, they are, if you like an internationally agreed norm; that means that in reality these things should be harmonised, between all 28 member states. This has failed to happen. Now the EU has policy of animal products but it seems that in breach it's possible for misdescribed fake fur to reach the markets. The reason- no checks carried out in contravention of WTO rules ( a credible customs organisation). Misdescription is in it's fullest sense, a criminal offence. So since the EU controls trade, TFEU it's down to the EU who have no means of carrying out their function. Oh dear!!!! The Goods came in from China!!. Where were the checks carried out as first port of entry into the EU?-probably not even examined. But remember your criticising both parties "for being good Europeans." The argument falls somewhat flat when the counter argument is to take back control at borders.
But in my book there is a basic difference between connivance (Labour) and having your hands tied(Tory)
Little snippet from the Express last week. HO figures 10,129 due to be deported between Jan 2016 and May this Year. 6,237 taken off flights on last minute appeals and court injunctions. Cost per passenger £5,209 per passenger.
Total cost (my calc £32,488,533) or 16.25 Million per financial year, because of misapplication of the EU HR.
You just try getting Legal aid on a minimum wage to fight a bank for subsequent illegal actions in civil court on potentialy criminal matter because the state can't be bothered to implement the consumer right under art 7 or 8 ( right to enjoy property.) Mainly because internal Policy dictates whether the plod investigates unless directed by DPP.