Dan Gleebles
LE

Why have you posted a photo of an ex army officer pompous old cnut?
Oh, hang on...
Boring.
Gleichfalls.Why have you posted a photo of an ex army officer pompous old cnut?
Oh, hang on...
I did have fun on Facebook a year ago by highlighting that anyone who supported a second referendum must support the MAGA Mob’s attempt to overturn the US Election result.A (not very) tongue in cheek comparison of the anti Brexit movement and the US Capitol riots in the Speccy:
![]()
What the Capitol riots and the plot to stop Brexit have in common | The Spectator
It's not often that browsing the genteel aisles of Waterstones reminds you of madmen storming the Capitol in buffalo-horn helmets, but that's the buzz I got as I briskly scanned the History shelves. I happened on a slender volume called How To Stop Brexit, written by Nick Clegg. I’d never heard...www.spectator.co.uk
Perhaps Gracucünt and Baggy can explain how Brexit is causing rapidly rising inflation and the empty shelves seen across the USA?
Must be a simple enough task for such experts.
An unusual action? An MP lobbying a foreign government on behalf of the UK. Which ever side of the Brexit debate you're on, it seems strange to me as to who's authority he's doing this on, unless PMTM instructed him to do so.
'Daniel Kawczynski, the MP for Shrewsbury and Atcham in Shropshire, revealed his request in a tweet in which he said: “Any attempts by Remainer MPs to delay or obstruct Brexit must be opposed. Today I have formally asked Polish Government to veto any motions by EU to allow extension of Article 50." '
Read more at: Daniel Kawczynski: Tory MP asks Poland to block Article 50 extension – and force no-deal Brexit
I wonder how the Doom & Gloom merchants will explain this one
Despite Brexit - Despite the ravages of a worldwide pandemic
I wonder how the Doom & Gloom merchants will explain this one
Despite Brexit - Despite the ravages of a worldwide pandemic
Why would we want to pay for this second rate system when we have access to GPS?Interesting article
![]()
View from Brussels: Satellite cherry-pickers
The United Kingdom lost access to the Galileo satellite navigation network when its EU membership ended, but as geopolitical tensions continue to rise, could Britain return to the GPS fold, despite Brexit?eandt.theiet.org
The United Kingdom lost access to the Galileo satellite navigation network when its EU membership ended, but as geopolitical tensions continue to rise, could Britain return to the GPS fold?
...
Somewhat ironically, the British government was among those EU countries lobbying against membership for non-EU members when the UK was a part of the bloc, reportedly citing security concerns and, less vocally, industrial interests as a reason to ring-fence Galileo.
The latter issue was wholeheartedly seized upon and supported by France, which continues to champion the interests of its domestic industry, which includes Airbus, Arianespace and Safran.
But as geopolitical tensions rise in Europe’s east with Russia’s continued posturing towards Ukraine and the Kremlin’s role in exacerbating energy prices in the West, the UK government might yet ask Brussels to let it rejoin Galileo.
That is according to MP David Morris, the chair of the parliamentary space committee, who told the Daily Express that the situation in Ukraine “will sharpen everyone’s attention” and spur a rethink of how intelligence resources are managed.
“I think we’ll step back from the brink and the grown-ups in the room will calm it all down,” Mr Morris said, adding that once the French presidential elections are over in April, there could be a compromise.
Interesting article
![]()
View from Brussels: Satellite cherry-pickers
The United Kingdom lost access to the Galileo satellite navigation network when its EU membership ended, but as geopolitical tensions continue to rise, could Britain return to the GPS fold, despite Brexit?eandt.theiet.org
The United Kingdom lost access to the Galileo satellite navigation network when its EU membership ended, but as geopolitical tensions continue to rise, could Britain return to the GPS fold?
...
Somewhat ironically, the British government was among those EU countries lobbying against membership for non-EU members when the UK was a part of the bloc, reportedly citing security concerns and, less vocally, industrial interests as a reason to ring-fence Galileo.
The latter issue was wholeheartedly seized upon and supported by France, which continues to champion the interests of its domestic industry, which includes Airbus, Arianespace and Safran.
But as geopolitical tensions rise in Europe’s east with Russia’s continued posturing towards Ukraine and the Kremlin’s role in exacerbating energy prices in the West, the UK government might yet ask Brussels to let it rejoin Galileo.
That is according to MP David Morris, the chair of the parliamentary space committee, who told the Daily Express that the situation in Ukraine “will sharpen everyone’s attention” and spur a rethink of how intelligence resources are managed.
“I think we’ll step back from the brink and the grown-ups in the room will calm it all down,” Mr Morris said, adding that once the French presidential elections are over in April, there could be a compromise.
Pity we could jail the clowns responsible for squandering money like that. Still we’re well out now.![]()
UK lost £1.2bn Galileo stake despite supplying all key parts, and now has to pay to use it
BREXIT saw the UK leave the Galileo programme, despite investing £1.2billion into the space probe and supplying, and assembling, 34 key parts for the project.www.express.co.uk
BREXIT saw the UK leave the Galileo programme, despite investing £1.2billion into the space probe and supplying, and assembling, 34 key parts for the project
We don’t have full access to GPS, only the open access. We will also have access to the open access part of Galileo (which will perform better than open access GPS) without contributing a penny, but there must be a reason why the chair of the Parliamentary Space Committee is putting it out there that the UK may seek a way back in.Why would we want to pay for this second rate system when we have access to GPS?
It was always a ridiculous vanity project. We’re well out of it.
1.2 billion is not a pennywithout contributing a penny, but there must be a reason why the chair of the Parliamentary Space Committee is putting it out there that the UK may seek a way back in.
We don’t have full access to GPS, only the open access. We will also have access to the open access part of Galileo (which will perform better than open access GPS) without contributing a penny, but there must be a reason why the chair of the Parliamentary Space Committee is putting it out there that the UK may seek a way back in.
That's quite a claim.We don’t have full access to GPS, only the open access. We will also have access to the open access part of Galileo (which will perform better than open access GPS) without contributing a penny, but there must be a reason why the chair of the Parliamentary Space Committee is putting it out there that the UK may seek a way back in.