Wightsparker
LE

See my post at #1,079 - it's definitely NOT included in the BBC's website offering.I just went through it on iplayer, and it's included there.
See my post at #1,079 - it's definitely NOT included in the BBC's website offering.I just went through it on iplayer, and it's included there.
Really that is a fairly accurate description as it was a case of AM talking to the PM who was not allowed to respond properly*, so "talking to" accurately describes the scene!They have it wrong on their website. It states “Andrew Marr talks to.......”
From what I saw yesterday, more like “Andrew Marr talks (shouts) over”.
I disagree, but not falling out over it! “Talks to” infers a decent conversation or debate was had - it was nothing of the sort. You’re right about Boris ignoring his increasingly manic interjections though!Really that is a fairly accurate description as it was a case of AM talking to the PM who was not allowed to respond properly*, so "talking to" accurately describes the scene!
*Ok PMBJ did respond but as soon as it left AM's agenda he jumped in to interrupt. While it is fair enough, especially with BoJo who is liable to waffle on, but in AM's case it was very annoying and I did like the way that BJ continued to answer the question as asked despite AM trying to change the subject.
Britain Broardcasts Crap Website I think.I disagree, but not falling out over it! “Talks to” infers a decent conversation or debate was had - it was nothing of the sort. You’re right about Boris ignoring his increasingly manic interjections though!
Perhaps I’m just surprised at an inaccuracy on the BBC Website!![]()
See my post at #1,079 - it's definitely NOT included in the BBC's website offering.
And they will still respond with something like,For all you Scots out there do put in a formal complaint to the BBC, it is an easy process, BBC Complaints. Only if they start to receive a number of complaints will they pay any attention.
My bold - you're on Arrse, what more do you need?I'm sorry to say i've witnessed the same.
But being white and middle class and more respectful of the law I am doubtless seen as 'low hanging fruit'.
I can't call on a mob of 'brothers' to be outraged on my behalf.
So true - it will just need the BBC to hear that he is supported by his Arrse brothers and he will be signed up toot-sweet!My bold - you're on Arrse, what more do you need?
Just watched a BBC interviewer grilling a port operator at Dover. The beeb guy tried everything to elicit a negative response about how things were going..... The oppo consistently replied that everything and everyone was working just fine.Now that is really interesting, if even the BBC realised how biased it was!
Sir Ed or Andy floppy hand?Pathetic and irrelevant.
Who... did I hear the nonentity say he’d demanded exty ex billions of pounds from the government for some post pandemic make things better plan?‘Sir’ Ed Davey being given yet more BBC air time to continue crying over Brexit. Hardly challenged by Marr as he ripped into the Government, although to be fair he did ridicule him over Lib Dem local Election campaign plans in the midst of a pandemic. Pathetic and irrelevant.
They don't have to. That's why they're Lib Dems.Un Lib Un Dem party STILL crying about Brexit? FFS. When are they going to just grow up?
Remember, many of these seemingly strange and innocuous questions are setting up events for later. If it comes to light that an HB has destroyed vaccines, for whatever reason such as out of date, either the Head of NHS England or some politician will be reminded of this question and response. This will give the interviewer an attack route, regardless of the context of the question as asked now and later.Marr did ask head of NHS "Has anyone been told to destroy unused vaccine?". Among other stupid/aggressive questions
What a lemon.
Marr did ask head of NHS "Has anyone been told to destroy unused vaccine?". Among other stupid/aggressive questions
What a lemon.
The Beeb have mentioned ‘wasted’ vaccine jabs several times over the past 24 hours, and have said ‘some people’ are concerned or angry about the waste.
The stories have talked the waste as a general thing, and not at specific sites for specific reasons.
What shows their desperation (imho) to play down the UK’s achievement is that they are saying that although a couple of hundred thousand doses are being done each day that DOZENS are vaccines are being wasted.
A headline talking about hundred of thousands wasted, or even thousands may be a talking point...........but DOZENS!!
Marr did ask head of NHS "Has anyone been told to destroy unused vaccine?". Among other stupid/aggressive questions
What a lemon.