Text of Bin Laden's recent speech

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by gallowglass, Nov 2, 2004.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Please excuse my posting this lengthy body of text, but I believe it will be of interest to many.

    Following is the full English transcript of Usama bin Ladin's speech in a videotape sent to Aljazeera. In the interests of authenticity, the content of the transcript, which appeared as subtitles at the foot of the screen, has been left unedited. (From AlJazeera.net)

    Praise be to Allah who created the creation for his worship and commanded them to be just and permitted the wronged one to retaliate against the oppressor in kind. To proceed:
    Peace be upon he who follows the guidance: People of America this talk of mine is for you and concerns the ideal way to prevent another Manhattan, and deals with the war and its causes and results.

    Before I begin, I say to you that security is an indispensable pillar of human life and that free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom.
    If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example - Sweden? And we know that freedom-haters don't possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 - may Allah have mercy on them.

    No, we fight because we are free men who don't sleep under oppression. We want to restore freedom to our nation, just as you lay waste to our nation. So shall we lay waste to yours.

    No one except a dumb thief plays with the security of others and then makes himself believe he will be secure. Whereas thinking people, when disaster strikes, make it their priority to look for its causes, in order to prevent it happening again.

    But I am amazed at you. Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred.

    So I shall talk to you about the story behind those events and shall tell you truthfully about the moments in which the decision was taken, for you to consider.
    I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.

    The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorised and displaced.

    I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy.

    The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn't respond.

    In those difficult moments many hard-to-describe ideas bubbled in my soul, but in the end they produced an intense feeling of rejection of tyranny, and gave birth to a strong resolve to punish the oppressors.

    And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children.

    And that day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is freedom and democracy, while resistance is terrorism and intolerance.

    This means the oppressing and embargoing to death of millions as Bush Sr did in Iraq in the greatest mass slaughter of children mankind has ever known, and it means the throwing of millions of pounds of bombs and explosives at millions of children - also in Iraq - as Bush Jr did, in order to remove an old agent and replace him with a new puppet to assist in the pilfering of Iraq's oil and other outrages.

    So with these images and their like as their background, the events of September 11th came as a reply to those great wrongs, should a man be blamed for defending his sanctuary?

    Is defending oneself and punishing the aggressor in kind, objectionable terrorism? If it is such, then it is unavoidable for us.

    This is the message which I sought to communicate to you in word and deed, repeatedly, for years before September 11th.

    And you can read this, if you wish, in my interview with Scott in Time Magazine in 1996, or with Peter Arnett on CNN in 1997, or my meeting with John Weiner in 1998.
    You can observe it practically, if you wish, in Kenya and Tanzania and in Aden. And you can read it in my interview with Abdul Bari Atwan, as well as my interviews with Robert Fisk.

    The latter is one of your compatriots and co-religionists and I consider him to be neutral. So are the pretenders of freedom at the White House and the channels controlled by them able to run an interview with him? So that he may relay to the American people what he has understood from us to be the reasons for our fight against you?
    If you were to avoid these reasons, you will have taken the correct path that will lead America to the security that it was in before September 11th. This concerned the causes of the war.

    As for it's results, they have been, by the grace of Allah, positive and enormous, and have, by all standards, exceeded all expectations. This is due to many factors, chief among them, that we have found it difficult to deal with the Bush administration in light of the resemblance it bears to the regimes in our countries, half of which are ruled by the military and the other half which are ruled by the sons of kings and presidents.
    Our experience with them is lengthy, and both types are replete with those who are characterised by pride, arrogance, greed and misappropriation of wealth. This resemblance began after the visits of Bush Sr to the region.

    At a time when some of our compatriots were dazzled by America and hoping that these visits would have an effect on our countries, all of a sudden he was affected by those monarchies and military regimes, and became envious of their remaining decades in their positions, to embezzle the public wealth of the nation without supervision or accounting.
    So he took dictatorship and suppression of freedoms to his son and they named it the Patriot Act, under the pretence of fighting terrorism. In addition, Bush sanctioned the installing of sons as state governors, and didn't forget to import expertise in election fraud from the region's presidents to Florida to be made use of in moments of difficulty.
    All that we have mentioned has made it easy for us to provoke and bait this administration. All that we have to do is to send two mujahidin to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note other than some benefits for their private companies.
    This is in addition to our having experience in using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers, as we, alongside the mujahidin, bled Russia for 10 years, until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat.

    All Praise is due to Allah.

    So we are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah.
    That being said, those who say that al-Qaida has won against the administration in the White House or that the administration has lost in this war have not been precise, because when one scrutinises the results, one cannot say that al-Qaida is the sole factor in achieving those spectacular gains.
    Rather, the policy of the White House that demands the opening of war fronts to keep busy their various corporations - whether they be working in the field of arms or oil or reconstruction - has helped al-Qaida to achieve these enormous results.

    And so it has appeared to some analysts and diplomats that the White House and us are playing as one team towards the economic goals of the United States, even if the intentions differ.

    And it was to these sorts of notions and their like that the British diplomat and others were referring in their lectures at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. [When they pointed out that] for example, al-Qaida spent $500,000 on the event, while America, in the incident and its aftermath, lost - according to the lowest estimate - more than $500 billion.
    Meaning that every dollar of al-Qaida defeated a million dollars by the permission of Allah, besides the loss of a huge number of jobs.
    As for the size of the economic deficit, it has reached record astronomical numbers estimated to total more than a trillion dollars.

    And even more dangerous and bitter for America is that the mujahidin recently forced Bush to resort to emergency funds to continue the fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, which is evidence of the success of the bleed-until-bankruptcy plan - with Allah's permission.
    It is true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained, but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something of which anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Halliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And it all shows that the real loser is ... you.
    It is the American people and their economy. And for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should be carried out within 20 minutes, before Bush and his administration notice.

    It never occurred to us that the commander-in-chief of the American armed forces would abandon 50,000 of his citizens in the twin towers to face those great horrors alone, the time when they most needed him.

    But because it seemed to him that occupying himself by talking to the little girl about the goat and its butting was more important than occupying himself with the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers, we were given three times the period required to execute the operations - all praise is due to Allah.
    And it's no secret to you that the thinkers and perceptive ones from among the Americans warned Bush before the war and told him: "All that you want for securing America and removing the weapons of mass destruction - assuming they exist - is available to you, and the nations of the world are with you in the inspections, and it is in the interest of America that it not be thrust into an unjustified war with an unknown outcome."
    But the darkness of the black gold blurred his vision and insight, and he gave priority to private interests over the public interests of America.

    So the war went ahead, the death toll rose, the American economy bled, and Bush became embroiled in the swamps of Iraq that threaten his future. He fits the saying "like the naughty she-goat who used her hoof to dig up a knife from under the earth".
    So I say to you, over 15,000 of our people have been killed and tens of thousands injured, while more than a thousand of you have been killed and more than 10,000 injured. And Bush's hands are stained with the blood of all those killed from both sides, all for the sake of oil and keeping their private companies in business.

    Be aware that it is the nation who punishes the weak man when he causes the killing of one of its citizens for money, while letting the powerful one get off, when he causes the killing of more than 1000 of its sons, also for money.
    And the same goes for your allies in Palestine. They terrorise the women and children, and kill and capture the men as they lie sleeping with their families on the mattresses, that you may recall that for every action, there is a reaction.
    Finally, it behoves you to reflect on the last wills and testaments of the thousands who left you on the 11th as they gestured in despair. They are important testaments, which should be studied and researched.

    Among the most important of what I read in them was some prose in their gestures before the collapse, where they say: "How mistaken we were to have allowed the White House to implement its aggressive foreign policies against the weak without supervision."
    It is as if they were telling you, the people of America: "Hold to account those who have caused us to be killed, and happy is he who learns from others' mistakes."
    And among that which I read in their gestures is a verse of poetry. "Injustice chases its people, and how unhealthy the bed of tyranny."

    As has been said: "An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure."
    And know that: "It is better to return to the truth than persist in error." And that the wise man doesn't squander his security, wealth and children for the sake of the liar in the White House.
    In conclusion, I tell you in truth, that your security is not in the hands of Kerry, nor Bush, nor al-Qaida. No.

    Your security is in your own hands. And every state that doesn't play with our security has automatically guaranteed its own security.
    And Allah is our Guardian and Helper, while you have no Guardian or Helper. All peace be upon he who follows the Guidance.
  2. Bad CO

    Bad CO LE Admin Reviews Editor Gallery Guru

    Well worth reading properly - thank you
  3. I think that this deserves the sort of treatment it would get in The NAAFI Bar.
  4. reading it , its easy to see how such fluid words can seduce the feeble minded into becoming martyrs killing themselves for some deluded aims
  5. 307

    307 War Hero

    Whoever writes his speeches is bloody clever, they're very well written and almost have you convinced. I'm a believer that direct comparisons can be drawn between the Brit empire and US at the min whilst US doesn't hold territory it's influence is everywhere as was ours in our day, what did we get for it from most, revolt! Sadly, times have allowed the fight to be taken to the power bases homeland now by fairly simple groups. Whoever holds supreme power in the world is in for a rough time, simply because the positin of power forces you to get involved with certain things which piss others off no end!
  6. Clever? Well, folks have every right to their own opinion. This drivel reminds me of the old Soviet psy-ops dreck, but instead of bread, freedom and the solidarity of the masses, we have Allah and his divine guidance.

    In one part of this nonsense he insists that it doesn't matter who is President, that Al Qaida is winning. But throughout he snipes at Bush, encouraging the Yanks to give him the sack. Why? Could it be that Georgie keeps kicking Usama's ass and that Usama and boys are quickly running out of friends?

    At any rate, total drivel and dreck.
  7. It almost has you convinced until:
    However much you may be able to sympathise with his cause, these kinds of actions are never excusable. Not one bit.
  8. Couple reasons why?

    There's no excusing for 9/11, but if some of BL's 'reasoning' still exists, or has worsen, thats why it sounds like he's repeating himself. But, in his tirade, he contradicts himself when he states that sight of seeing millions of innocent people killed in Lebanon is what spurned him when that's exactly what he has done, and continues to do. Tit for tat. Its like two boys in a playground fighting over what one's dad did before their time.

  9. His message is not the same...prior to this it was death to the infadels and now it is "if you leave me alone a I will leave you alone."

    The man is deluded, and what I read are the rantings of a mad man seeking to validate his mere existance.
  10. yup, but then the US elections are nearly over anyway...

  11. This article (necessarily posted in full on account of it being from The Telegraph) is by someone whose opinion I value. My own opinion - for what it is worth - is that Bin Laden's statement, while displaying a degree of perception as to the thinking of a certain section of the West, seems to boil down to 'be nice to me or I'll blow you up'. It is telling that he would see fit to refer to Sweden, a country almost invisible in real terms on the international stage, and noted for its (a) almost pathological liberalism, (b) support for radical (and often violent) causes, and (c) hostility to the United States and Israel. I imagine that Bin Laden and his sort would dearly like the West to be more like Sweden - spineless, utterly post-Christian, enamoured of radically chic causes, and possessing armed forces with no will to fight.

    'Nothing more sinister than a grainy video'

    The fact that Osama bin Laden is issuing threats instead of implementing terror attacks suggests that the war on al-Qaeda has been more successful than most people imagined, writes Con Coughlin

    Not so much the October surprise as September remembered. Or September 11, 2001, to be precise. For weeks Democrats have been wondering aloud whether the Bush camp might use the final month of the presidential election campaign to reveal that Osama bin Laden, the architect of the devastating 9/11 attacks had been finally apprehended.

    The Democrats, after all, were the original target of the October Surprise conspiracy theory when in 1980 Ronald Reagan, the Republican candidate, accused the then President Jimmy Carter of trying to negotiate a secret deal to secure the release of the American embassy hostages held in Iran days before Americans went to the polls.

    More recently security officials have been publicly worrying whether bin Laden was planning to revisit the scene of the most devastating terrorist attack of modern times, by carrying out what the IRA used to call a "spectacular" on the American mainland.

    In fact, bin Laden was able to produce nothing more sinister than a grainy video footage of him giving a rambling discourse about the lessons the American people have failed to learn from the World Trade Center attack.

    Just how much impact bin Laden's tape will have on voting intentions at this late stage in the election campaign will be revealed in the early hours of Wednesday morning when the exit polls reveal the identity of the likely victor. With President Bush and Senator John Kerry, the Democratic challenger, running almost neck and neck in the polls, any intervention that sways voters either way could be decisive.

    American intelligence analysts yesterday said that they believed that this latest tape, the first to feature bin Laden himself for more than a year, was recorded last Sunday. The tape was dropped at the main gate of Al-Jazeera's office in the Pakistan capital, Islamabad. Ahmed Zaidan, Al-Jazeera's bureau chief, is personally known to bin Laden and he has met him several times both before and since the September 11 attacks. After the tape was delivered, the bureau received a call from a satellite telephone asking whether it had been safely received. The tape was 18 minutes long, but only between 13 and 14 minutes were broadcast. "It was just camera positioning and so on that was left out," said a spokesman.

    Unlike previous tapes where bin Laden is dressed in camouflage fatigues and is brandishing an AK-47 assault rifle, on this occasion he is dressed in traditional Arabic dress and is reading from a lectern.

    British intelligence officials last night confirmed that they had no doubts that the tape was authentic, and said that the tape would be studied in forensic detail for any clues it might provide about bin Laden's whereabouts or his state of mind.

    The basic gist of bin Laden's latest contribution is that the American people have not learned their lesson from the 9/11 attacks and, as a consequence, should prepare themselves for more of the same. Advising them on how to "avoid another Manhattan", bin Laden provides the rather bizarre example of "why we did not attack Sweden", the answer being that Sweden had not done anything to impinge upon the freedoms of bin Laden and his followers. As for the Americans, "we fought you because we are free and because we want freedom for our nation. When you squander our security, we squander yours."

    He goes on to criticise the "American-Israeli alliance against our people in Palestine and Lebanon". Bin Laden claims that "as I watched the destroyed towers in Lebanon, it occurred to me to punish the unjust in the same way [and] to destroy towers in America so it could taste some of what we are tasting and to stop killing our women and children."

    If taken at face value, this statement would suggest that bin Laden had been planning the 9/11 attacks since Israel's 1982 aerial bombardment of Beirut. It is the first time that bin Laden has sought to give a justification for the 9/11 attacks.

    Bin Laden also criticises President Bush for not acting fast enough to save the lives of those trapped in the twin towers. "It never occurred to us that the commander-in-chief of the American forces would leave 50,000 citizens in the two towers to face those horrors alone at a time when they most needed him because he thought listening to a child discussing her goat and its ramming was more important than the planes and their ramming of the skyscrapers."
    There is, though, an unmistakeable air of petulance in bin Laden's commentary, a sense of frustration that the world is not taking his threats with sufficient seriousness. "I'm surprised by you," bin Laden admonishes Americans. "Despite entering the fourth year after September 11, Bush is still deceiving you and hiding the truth from you and therefore the reasons are still there to repeat what happened."

    The very fact that bin Laden is merely issuing threats, rather than implementing terror attacks, suggests that the war on terror has been more successful than most people imagined in disrupting al-Qaeda's infrastructure and effectiveness. Even if bin Laden himself remains at large, many of his key lieutenants have either been captured or killed, and bin Laden now lives a peripatetic existence thanks to the overthrow of the Taliban in Afghanistan.

    Certainly this is a fact that the Bush camp will seek to emphasise in the belief that it should reaffirm their candidates' credentials as a war-time commander with the courage to confront his enemies.
  12. gallowglass, I'm guessing that you dont like the Swedes. :lol:

    Just a detail but the way I heard it, the Swedish KFOR contingent was a damn sight more robust and effective than most other nations during this year's riots and ethnic cleansing in Kosovo.
  13. You on about GWB, ctauch??

    Basics of basics. OBL is rubbing the shaved chimps nose in the fact that he is still alive depsite the chucking a zillion tonnes of HE on most of the third world. I feel the irony is lost on Dr Zaius (aka Georgey boy http://www.movieprop.com/tvandmovie/PlanetoftheApes/character1.htm)

    Didnt GWB say he would not allow terrorists to attack USA as apart of his campaign for re-election?? Bit late as he didnt see it coming in the first place. A good reason to give him the boot.

    If the Texas farm boy does get re elected, its a bonus for terrorism as he's done more for the cause than Gerry or Martin ever did for the Repulicans. Trouble is, he doesnt see it. Stupid is as stupid does.
  14. Ho hum. Yet again the opposition win the information war. This video achieves several things for several audiences:

    1. OBL supporters - more of what they like.
    2. Uncommitted muslims - he's not just a nutter is he ... maybe I should find out more
    3. Palestinians - obviously an ally of ours
    4. Neutral countries - if we keep on his good side we'll be OK
    5. Other countries with whom the US has disagreements - let's see if we can help him quietly
    6. USA - annoys the f*ck out of them

    By way of contrast the drivel spewed by the current US administration only serves to annoy as many people as possible. They consistently fail to realise that other people see the world differently to them and don't care what Joe Sixpack in Buttf*ck Wisconsin thinks.