Tell it like it is.

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by PE4rocks, Apr 20, 2007.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. If this has been seen or discussed before, then I appologise. If not then it is worth an airing.

    I received this in an email

    "You may have seen retired Lt Cdr Rob H's letter in the Telegraph a couple of
    day's ago. You may wish to read the full text of his submission which was,
    for obvious reasons, too long for publication (it should have been an
    Editorial or full page article).





    I dedicated 32 years to the Royal Navy and left just over four years ago
    after becoming increasingly despondent about the erosion of service ethos,
    under-funding, dispiriting tail-chasing paperwork, reduced standards, and
    the destruction of a way of life. Our armed forces, once treasured as the
    finest on earth, now reflect much of the tawdry reputation and incompetence
    of our national leadership and the social engineering imposed by a
    succession of meddling governments and senior civil servants. There was a
    time when the Royal Navy's announcement that the boarding party incident had
    occurred in Iraqi waters would have been unquestioned because it was held in
    such high esteem. Now, its word is even disputed by many of our own
    countrymen and women, not to mention the national media.

    By and large, service personnel are still the salt of the earth but many of
    the younger members no longer have the unshakeable commitment, pride and
    belief of their forebears. Their values and priorities lie elsewhere. Such
    people regard the armed forces as just another job and a useful step towards
    a more rewarding career in civilian life, so why take risks? Not least is
    the more general feeling that they, and their profession, are misunderstood
    by the decision-makers and unappreciated by the public whose more
    comfortable way of life they risk their own lives to defend. Much has been
    made of the supposed covenant between the nation and its armed forces. In my
    view, the nation has not only broken this but has ground it underfoot.
    Sailors, soldiers and airmen on minimum wage are expected to achieve the
    impossible with shrinking resources, inappropriate tools, inadequate
    training and grudging political and public support. Soldiers in particular
    are trained to kill but are expected to behave with impeccable discretion
    and forbearance despite the worst provocation. If they shoot someone in the
    heat of the moment or make a wrong tactical decision amid the fog of war,
    they know they will be hung out to dry, usually after an agonisingly long
    period of uncertainty, by a Government populated by lawyers, party political
    apparatchiks, ex-trade union officials and spin-doctors who know nothing and
    seem to care even less about such split-second life-or-death situations.

    The services have been deprived of their dedicated medical facilities and
    veterans are given little priority with respect to housing or social after
    care. There was a time when the 'Cornwall 15' would have taken it for
    granted that their government would move heaven and earth to secure their
    release and that the general public would be 100% behind them. Those days
    are gone as we have seen from the pathetic response of our Foreign Secretary
    and the many antipathetic views expressed on internet message boards and in
    the press. What type of culture does this exploitation engender? And what
    message does our submissiveness send about the next time our service
    personnel are kidnapped and held hostage? With no discernible sign of any
    deterrent or retribution following this episode, or the previous one for
    that matter, be in no doubt that there will be a next time. In short, our
    service people feel increasingly abandoned by those they are expected to
    serve without question.

    There were occasions when I would have done my job for peanuts because,
    perhaps naively, I felt such a strong (and dare I say altruistic) sense of
    purpose. Now, individual service people have become pawns in games of
    political expediency and spin, aided and abetted by the media. The services
    reflect the society they serve (and are actively encouraged to do so) so an
    increasing number of youngsters value money and celebrity far higher than
    any sense of public duty; hardly surprising when one looks at some of the
    sleazy role models in Parliament. Even our cynical Prime Minister shows more
    interest in arranging photo opportunities with so-called football heroes,
    pop stars and TV personalities than in visiting the returning wounded where
    he might risk the ordure of 'bad publicity'. The proud heritage that once
    provided service people with an anchor in times of adversity has been
    derided and dismantled by a succession of 'Year Zero' politicians and
    appointed lackeys who despise anything that happened before their time and
    demonstrate no accountability or remorse for the gravest of errors. Even the
    symbol of our former maritime pre-eminence has been usurped and turned into
    'Kool Britannia'. Discipline, aggression and elitism are taboo words in the
    modern lexicon but they are essential qualities for successful war-fighters.
    As for patriotism, honour, dignity and self-sacrifice, they're for 'losers'
    in today's free-for-all society where self-aggrandisement is prized as a
    virtue, rights are more important than responsibilities and image is more
    valid than substance. Small wonder that new recruits are imbued with a
    touchy-feely, Health & Safety fixated, risk-averse, compensation culture,
    instant gratification 'wannabe' attitude that sits uneasily with a selfless
    sense of duty and the need to sacrifice one's normal freedoms, safety and,
    when necessary, one's life for the greater good.

    The anti-submarine frigate HMS Cornwall probably did her best with the
    resources she had available; most of our 'fit-for-purpose' patrol vessels
    have been sold, scrapped or mothballed. Despite being involved in two major
    conflicts (most of the UK personnel serving in Afghanistan are Royal Marines
    or Fleet Air Arm) and having other worldwide commitments, the Royal Navy has
    to make do with a dwindling number of ships and aircraft, many of which are
    inappropriate for current tasks. Owing to the criminally reckless political
    decision to scrap the Sea Harrier before ordering its replacement, the Navy
    even lacks the organic airpower to protect its ships and the troops,
    ammunition, fuel, food, spares and other materiel needed to execute and
    sustain operations in the absence of host nation support. Adequate training
    is a luxury as successive defence reviews have cut personnel and equipment,
    increased administrative paperwork, extended tours of duty, civilianised
    shore-based posts that previously provided some manpower flexibility, and
    closed down or contracted out training facilities and moved them to ever
    more remote parts of the country.

    Granting permission for serving personnel to sell their stories to the
    tabloids was the next logical step on the road to transforming Britain's
    wars into reality TV shows where the lack of proper resources is the
    equivalent of a 'Bush-Tucker Trial'. I was embarrassed enough by the
    excruciating performance of members of the 'Cornwall 15' in the Iranian 'Big
    Brother House' but it took the tacky sale of stories, sanctioned at the
    highest level, to complete my shame. Apparently, this was condoned because
    Britain's 'official' word is no longer trusted and individuals' own accounts
    would prove more credible. What does that say about our country? The
    subsequent rescinding of this decision only made us, and our leadership,
    look even more ridiculous. Combine this with our participation in an
    unpopular war and it will take many years for us to regain our self-respect,
    if ever.

    During the Second World War, the Royal Navy evacuated 16,500 troops from
    Crete while losing many ships to the Luftwaffe owing to the lack of organic
    air protection. They carried on because, as Admiral Cunningham said at the
    time, "It takes three years to build a ship; it takes three centuries to
    build a tradition". It has taken this government a little over two weeks to
    destroy this hard-won tradition, but it has been busy eroding the
    foundations for years."

    Full marks say I.
     
  2. buy that man a beer.

    put to words exactly how I feel about this nation.
     
  3. Yep, wouldn't argue with any of that.
     
  4. Agree with most of what he says, however would challenge his comment

    "but many of the younger members no longer have the unshakeable commitment, pride and belief of their forebears. Their values and priorities lie elsewhere"

    Too easy to go for the knee-jerk criticism of young generation of servicemen (non-PC but includes gals!!). Most fine young-ish WOs/SNCOs of today were criticised by previous generations in similar terms.

    Newer generation are no better or worse - just a bit different. Give them the challenge and they face it with same courage and dedication. Just look at actions overseas at present.

    Wish same could be said of our political leaders - spineless, greedy, self serving, weak, PC and always, always, always blameless when all goes T*ts up
     
  5. Well said.
     
  6. How many more people have to say it before Bliar and his cronies start taking notice? What will it take to make them sit and think 'If I continue along the path that I have sent our forces along, the path will fall out from under them'?

    I heartly agree with Lt Cdr Rob H's comments. I only wish they didn't fall on deaf ears.

    Ish.
     
  7. Biped

    Biped LE Book Reviewer

    Top bloke - another one to join the ranks of people with the courage to say their bit, albeit after he's retired.
     
  8. Well said. I thought it was just me getting older and more bitter.

    Shame the people that could do something about it won't read it or don't care.
     
  9. Some good words but we DO still have some fine young men out there , serving.
     


  10. Agreed - nothing wrong with the young 'uns!!
     
  11. Mostly right, the training is still the best in the world, we just can't do enough of it.

    You only have to look at Helmand, or Al Amahra to see the quality of the young poeple in the forces. The Playstation generation can still do it if it has to.
     
  12. I agree with your sentiment 'Biped', but I get a tiny little feeling that this officer might have had the courage to say all this whilst he was still serving.
     
  13. I said that sort of thing - is that why I felt obliged to retire!!
     
  14. It's remarkably similar to a letter I'm drafting for when I leave the RAF. Mine is intended for the RAF News, however, rather than an organ of the standing of the Torygraph.
     
  15. Well written... and I have to agree that the youth have proven themselves to be made of stern material when the chips are down. They might not of been in the same physical condition as previous generations when reporting for duty but that is easily overcome by effective training.