Taliban assault Bagram

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by ghost_us, May 19, 2010.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37224593/ns/world_news-south_and_central_asia

    Hoping a speedy recovery to those wounded. 20 suicide attackers is right. Smells more like an act of defiant desperation than that of a strategic effort.
  2. 20 suicide bombers should mean at least 20 dead terrorists surely. Useless tw@ts
  3. Suicide attackers, not bombers. I think the point being made is that you don't attack Bagram with a 20 strong contingent and hope to survive.
  4. Attacker, bomber, whatever - still failed first part of description - "suicide".
  5. Perhaps they were trying to score a Tet-style 'if we can't even control the area around Bagram...' moment in the world media?
  6. Given how large Bagram is I am suprised they tried it on like that. Like has been said they can't have been expecting to make it back.