• ARRSE have partnered with Armadillo Merino to bring you an ARRSE exclusive, generous discount offer on their full price range.
    To keep you warm with the best of Merino gear, visit www.armadillomerino.co.uk and use the code: NEWARRSE40 at the checkout to get 40% off!
    This superb deal has been generously offered to us by Armadillo Merino and is valid until midnight on the the 28th of February.

Tale of two Boy soldiers

#3
There seems to be a head of steam growing under the idea that "18 is too young to go in a war."

Personally i was much more physically resilant then than I was 10 years later, recovered from injuries faster and phys was less of an effort.... so I think some of the sympathy is misplaced.

Trotsky
 
#4
Trotsky said:
There seems to be a head of steam growing under the idea that "18 is too young to go in a war."

Personally i was much more physically resilant then than I was 10 years later, recovered from injuries faster and phys was less of an effort.... so I think some of the sympathy is misplaced.

Trotsky
If you can vote then siurely you are mature enough to go to war
 
#8
maxi_77 said:
Trotsky said:
There seems to be a head of steam growing under the idea that "18 is too young to go in a war."

Personally i was much more physically resilant then than I was 10 years later, recovered from injuries faster and phys was less of an effort.... so I think some of the sympathy is misplaced.

Trotsky
If you can vote then siurely you are mature enough to go to war
I would argue there is no relationship between the two. fit aggressive young animals, well trained and equipped can go to war. However most 18 year olds do not have a scoobie about politics and the economy...

At 18 you are fit and you do recover well but you are still a bit soft around the edges. An op tour goes a long way to hardening the edges and means that the 20/25 year old on the second tour is better adjusted and able to use their increasing stamina.
 
#9
Fallschirmjager said:
We're on about the real army not cadets.
I went into JLR at 15 years 9 months, as soon as my O levels were complete I was on the train for basic.

When I reached 18 I thought I was old FFS. Its only when you are 20 years older that you realise that you were still a bairn.

I would rather have done my fighting when I was 18 though, you need blokes with balls of steel and a little less caution than more experienced people have.
 
#11
In Charles Whiting's book, 'The Poor Bloody Infantry' there is a bit referring to the Army in the NW Europe campaign, the gist of it saying that the 18-19 year old's were more effective and took more risks that the older mid-twenties soldiers.
 
#12
spent_case said:
I seem to recall that one of the lads we had killed on Granby was 17. I think it was in the blue on blue, but am not 100% sure.
Yep, it was in that warrior incident with the A10's (I think). Wasn't there 17 year olds killed in the SA?
 
#13
I am very good friends with the chap who was the youngest Para who fought in the Falklands, he was in 3 Para, he lost a couple of friends who were also under 18.

Edited to add, I joined at 16 in 1984.
 
#15
Filbert Fox said:
I am very good friends with the chap who was the youngest Para who fought in the Falklands, he was in 3 Para, he lost a couple of friends who were also under 18.
Filbert, I have heard a few claims to that particular title. Not debunking your mate but has he got ginger hair and was he a casette head in the RAOC after he left Para Regt? If so I know him too!
 
#16
BPS666 said:
spent_case said:
I seem to recall that one of the lads we had killed on Granby was 17. I think it was in the blue on blue, but am not 100% sure.
Yep, it was in that warrior incident with the A10's (I think). Wasn't there 17 year olds killed in the SA?
There was 3 if I recall. Pte's Burt and Crow were two I can remember.
 
#17
Cuddles said:
maxi_77 said:
Trotsky said:
There seems to be a head of steam growing under the idea that "18 is too young to go in a war."

Personally i was much more physically resilant then than I was 10 years later, recovered from injuries faster and phys was less of an effort.... so I think some of the sympathy is misplaced.

Trotsky
If you can vote then siurely you are mature enough to go to war
I would argue there is no relationship between the two. fit aggressive young animals, well trained and equipped can go to war. However most 18 year olds do not have a scoobie about politics and the economy...

At 18 you are fit and you do recover well but you are still a bit soft around the edges. An op tour goes a long way to hardening the edges and means that the 20/25 year old on the second tour is better adjusted and able to use their increasing stamina.
Experience certainly changes things, my training was relatively long and on completion I met up once again with others who had been on a shorter training path. At that stage they were certainly much more mature, but it took a very short time for us to catch up.

I think that for a properly trained person they contribute differing attributes to their service depending on their age and experience. Thus a balanced unit will field people of varying ages and experience.

Certainly I do feel the not allowing some one you permit to vote to go to war is a step too far, though I can see this attempt to keep them as children for longer process continuing.
 

Latest Threads