TA as cheap alternative to Regular Army?

Discussion in 'Army Reserve' started by Eccles, Sep 11, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. 36 Signal Regiment has been providing the comms support for FRESCO in Suffolk (yes - it as happening although there has been little press attention). The brief was for two teams of volunteers, one on shift with the others continuing in their normal jobs but on zero notice to move. The deal was that both would be paid full MTDs for the duration of the operation to compensate for the disruption to their normal lives.

    Fast forward six weeks and things are running smoothly. The TA soldiers are doing a great job. Those with employers are mostly taking unpaid leave, the self employed are giving up most of the jobs coming their way. At this point the bean counters start to question why the standby team is being paid so much – after all they aren’t working - and it has been decided that they will only be paid quarter MTDs. As a result both teams have decided that they no longer want to play.

    Their reasoning is;

    1. The TA (or at least this bit of it) have no wish to be a cheap substitute for regular army soldiers or formal mobilisation. They have no pension rights or employment protection and those with employers are only able to continue due to their goodwill.

    2. They can no longer afford to continue. Those who are self employed are generally turning away business and earn less from TA pay than their normal employment, for the unemployed this is their only form of income. The £7 pounds a Signalman gets as a quarter days pay is not anything like adequate compensation for what they loose in lost business while on shift.

    At the moment the Regiment’s PSIs are being trained to take over. Do the maths – regular Sgts and SSgts or TA Signalmen – who costs more?
     
  2. msr

    msr LE

    The TA Sigs, of course.

    You need to look at this from the army's perspective: they will view the PSI's wages as a fixed cost.

    msr
     
  3. On 27 July 2005, TA personnel from 36 Signal Regiment were deployed on OP FRESCO to provide communication support to Army, Navy and RAF personnel covering Suffolk fire strikes. (Not only did they support them by providing comms, but trained them in the use of Airwave communications.) Initially they were told that they would be paid full MTD's whilst covering strikes and on standby, many of those individuals invovled re-arranged their family and work commitments, some taking unpaid leave, self employed turning down work offers,in order to cover the strike periods. TA personnel have provided everything that was asked of them and more. They have shown a skilled and professional approach to the job at hand, shown commitment and loyalty, promoted good relations between all three Services, the Police and the Local Authority, all of whom have nothing but praise for them.
    And now, after six weeks of providing those vital communications, they have been told that 49 BDE will no longer pay them whilst on standby, only for those days when the strikes are on. For a two hour strike these personnel have worked up to fifteen hours, leaving them NOT so bright eyed and bushy tailed for their civilian jobs the next day, luckily most employers have supported them .

    If they wanted cheap labour in the first place they should have opted for a call centre in India. If it works for BT, it should work for 49 BDE.
    As a result, those personnel were unable to commit further and as true professionals, will hand over to the next team ( Regular Sgts, SSgts and WO's, whose pay is considerably higher than £30 a day, 49 BDE PLEASE NOTE) a well organised communications support system. Good luck, carry on the good work that the first team started.
    A BIG THANK YOU to those personnel and their families involved for the huge sacrifices they have made, both financially and personally.
    Morale may be low, but please DON'T hand in your kit yet!!!!
     
  4. If the TA dont want to play then get off of the gravey train!!

    Dave
     
  5. OldSnowy

    OldSnowy LE Moderator Book Reviewer

    Gravy Train? Never heard it called that before. We did a calculation a few months back, and found that 8 out of 10 of the TA on a weekend were losing money by training, not gaining it.

    The other two were students, by the way.
     
  6. As stated in a previous post!

     
  7. Hmm. Picture said PSIs driving to the Arse End of the East through the night every night for six nights a week, then driving back post-strike and post-lunch to do what - begin a full day's work at their TACs? How long will that be considered workable and cost-efficient?

    Looking at things positively, this situation is now an opportunity to get the terms and conditions for CCRF/2 Sig Bde support-type work sorted out properly and fairly. Expecting mobilisation attitudes and actions without committing to mobilisation terms and conditions isn't going to work, for individuals, their employers or the units concerned.

    What I've seen of Fresco in Suffolk is a top and impressive bunch of professional soldiers happily give up "lives", wives, girlfriends, work, and money in order to carry out the jobs they were trained to do - only to see terms and conditions reduced from pretty miserly to downright unworkable. Gravy train? Knackered Hornby OO gauge maybe; not a living wage, for sure.

    It's not like there isn't money around to recognise the professionalism and commitment of those stepping up as requsted to serve for Fresco. The police working on this have been formally advised (I've seen it in letterheaded black and white) not to talk to their military colleagues about police pay rates and Fresco bonuses because the military - the Regs involved that is, mind you - are working for considerably less than they are and in many cases have had their long-awaited leave cancelled and so on. Presumably then they'd be too embarrassed to talk to us TA guys who're being asked to put lives, jobs and sensible drinking habits on hold for at worst 7 quid a day (pre-tax and NI).

    It's been genuinely interesting and rewarding to get stuck in and do a useful job for Op Fresco, but in the end also disappointing to discover how little those at the happy end of the food chains of power seem to understand about the complicated hassles of dropping life and work at a moment's notice to jump to the job required, and - what rankles the most perhaps - how little the good work we did was actually appreciated by them. Me, I hope someone somewhere will do the right thing, and the teams will be back at their post asap.
     
  8. msr

    msr LE

    Because this doesn't cost the army any more - you need to take off your civvy head when you look at this problem from a financial perspective.

    msr
     
  9. The cost is not a financial one.

    We can argue who would be paid more by whom, why and what for (and was it worth it) until midnight and won't achieve an answer. The point is that the TA guys stood up to do something at the cost of their private lives, at the cost of their time, potentially at the cost of their jobs, and definitely at the cost of their families. That this was scuppered by a bean counter is no surprise but the issue is about saying thank you which clearly, no-one has. A single thank-you for a job well done by someone who genuinely means it and who understands the sacrifices that the TA make to achieve what they do is worth the difference between regular and TA pay.

    Multiply this to Telic mobilisations and see Mr Mackays thread about joining and leaving, and you can see why FAS rebalancing can't come soon enough but may be just the beginning of a whole load of other problems.
     
  10. Exactly. You are right. But the decision was clearly based on financial considerations alone. For those that make this type of decision, the effect on individual's lives and ongoing military training is utterly irrelevant.

    msr has hit the nail on the head, it's cheaper to use regular PSIs and the like. Nuff said!
     
  11. Or you could argue that it only looks at the short-term financial costs (spend over the next month) as opposed to medium- and long-term financial costs (some thrusting Staff type argues that 10% of the PSIs that are f***ed about in such a way will leave because of family pressures, and then works out the resulting costs of training up a replacement for an senior NCO with years of sunk costs in investment technical training).

    Or is it only the TA that spent its entire time worrying about retention as well as recruitment. (While I despise the civilian "rebranding" of Personnel departments into "Human Resources", the latest variation of "Human Capital" at least tries to get people to understand that when people go, their knowledge goes with them.)
     
  12. I'm in total agreement with the majority that that it is the cost to personal circumstances and the family that suffer on these operations.
    Pay is not the issue, if the TA pay was so much, hey we'd all be doing it 24/7. Thanks for the educated answer from dave, gravey train i think the best and only answer to his comment would be 'ignorance is bliss' i'm sure he'll make a cracking security guard once his term of service is complete,
    Bills dont pay them selves and employers dont bend that much, it has to be 1 or the other and some formal paperwork is reqd not just word of mouth, this has thrown the future of such 'call ups' into some doupt with a lot of people, there is a clear requirement for a CCRF type role, but with out the support of the key workers then how will such 'ops' be future proofed?
    Lets get it right from the start, iron out the creases and provide a professional service to the govenment and nation as and when required!
     
  13. Not so much a short v long term cost issue. It's more a "off my budget, so I don't care!" Whoever's budget is responsible for the Suffolk FRESCO I guarantee is not responsible for the cost of retraining or whatever or whatever... The person making the decision is blind to the cost elsewhere, because it's off his/her books.

    And then there's another point to remember. Maybe said PSI's are due for 'manning control'. Pi$$ 'em off enough and they'll happily leave of their own accord before their time is up - and thus save the army a large pension payout!

    I've seen that trick played on more than one occasion..

    merkator
     
  14. I worked on Op FRESCO in 2002/2003. We were all promised LSSA, because we were all working away from our parent unit locations, and precedent had been set during the Foot & Mouth Crisis. We had it in writing that we were going to get it. I eventually got mine paid in Nov 2004, 16 months after the end of the Op.

    I agree fully with the comments above about getting Terms and Conditions of Service sorted out. I would be highly unlikely to volunteer for anything now unless formally mobilised, and my advice to others would also be not to volunteer.

    This is another sad example of the goodwill of TA soldiers (and their families and employers) being taken for granted by the powers that be. I think two things need to come out of this:

    1) We need to stop being so generous with our time. If you want me in, pay me to come in.

    2) We need to lobby the higher end of the food chain to sort out the Terms and Conditions of Service.
     
  15. I have a great deal of sympathy for all of you on this.

    What is amazing is that Airwolf, sig kipling, eccles and Mr_T all joined on 11 Sep to air the same grievance with their first posts. That has to be some sort of ARRSE miracle.