BrandySoured said:
I immediately wonder how are arrsers going to spin this into Broons fault?
Easy peasy.
If it wsn't for him, we wouldn't have to make these draconian cuts, and thus have so many jobs under threat, which in turn, wouldn't have scared investors so much.
Afet 13 years in power, on the purse strings and the rule book,
who the fcuk elses fault could it be? Camerons? He's only been here 5 minutes.
If the cupboards weren't bare
before the bank fiasco (sale of gold, over-spending etc), we could have propped up the banks
and kept some change back for a rainy day.
I believe it was said on here, by me as well as others that 800,000 extra civil servants does not a healthy economy make, and it might massage the true unemployment figures for a while, but there WILL be a bill to pay.