Statue of dead Prince Harry honours those unable to serve

Status
Not open for further replies.

the_boy_syrup

LE
Book Reviewer
#1
A statue of a "dead" Prince Harry clutching a cameo locket of his late mother, Princess Diana, and a bloodied flag of Wales is to go on display next week.

The statue is intended to be seen as a memorial to honour those who are willing but unable to serve the Iraq, artist Daniel Edwards said.

The memorial, which features the Prince laid out before the Union Jack with pennies placed over his eyes and his head rested on the bible, will go on show at the Trafalgar Hotel in central London next Thursday as part of the Bridge Art Fair.
The memorial statue of a dead Prince Harry is intended as a tribute to the 'brave at heart' says the artist

Mr Edwards, who is based in New York, said: "Prince Harry's spirit must have died the day they told him he couldn't serve.
The memorial features Prince Harry, with his unfired gun still holstered, laid out in front of the Union Jack while a desert vulture perches on his boot.
The Prince's head is earless, in reference to reports that militia leaders said they planned to send him back to his grandmother "without his ears".

Full story
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=485721&in_page_id=1770

Very strange
 

mysteron

LE
Book Reviewer
#2
I am afraid that this, like the Diana - Conspiracy or not? Thread is none of our business. This is a serving officer we are talking about here, not just someone who is known in the tabloid gutter press.

As a serving member of the Armed Forces, his right to as much persec as we can give is the same as anyone else.

I feel that none of us have an opinion that matters regarding the death of a serving officer's mother other than his family.
 
#3
mysteron said:
I am afraid that this, like the Diana - Conspiracy or not? Thread is none of our business. This is a serving officer we are talking about here, not just someone who is known in the tabloid gutter press.

As a serving member of the Armed Forces, his right to as much persec as we can give is the same as anyone else.

I feel that none of us have an opinion that matters regarding the death of a serving officer's mother other than his family.
What are you on?

This thread is about a tacky, tasteless statue made by some idiot yank 'artist', and has nothing to do with Prince Harry. Inanimate objects don't have persec issues.
 
#5
Oh.....and one last morning "have-a-go".........Why does everyone harp on about OPSEC/PERSEC all the f:cking time?!?!?
 
#6
the_boy_syrup said:
The Prince's head is earless, in reference to reports that militia leaders said they planned to send him back to his grandmother "without his ears".
I take it that Mr Edwards is going to angle-grind the ears off later then?
 
#7
Because PERSEC and OPSEC are important and people on ARRSE sometimes blurt out names etc. of serving personnel? :D

What a stupid statue.
 
#8
the_boy_syrup said:
The Prince's head is earless, in reference to reports that militia leaders said they planned to send him back to his grandmother "without his ears".
I take it that Mr Edwards is going to angle-grind the ears off later then?
 
#9
The_Goon said:
Because PERSEC and OPSEC are important and people on ARRSE sometimes blurt out names etc. of serving personnel? :D

What a stupid statue.
My name's David Smith, there's millions of us. There's also probably a few thousand of every name combination you can think of! Unless you're giving out names/locations together there's nothing to worry about.
 
#10
Spook_44 said:
the_boy_syrup said:
The Prince's head is earless, in reference to reports that militia leaders said they planned to send him back to his grandmother "without his ears".
I take it that Mr Edwards is going to angle-grind the ears off later then?
Fantastic, why don't you post it again? :roll:

Oh yes, and perhaps you should read the article too.

A bronze casting of his "severed ears" will also be on display at the hotel and will go on sale on the popular auction website eBay at a later date.
 
#11
Aye, looking at the picture of the statue in the link I see the following:

A. It has ears.
B. The webbing is wrong for a British soldier.
C. The combats look wrong for a British soldier.
D. It looks nothing like Prince Harry.

The sentiment may seem great to all those left wing civvie arrses, but what about a statue for those who can serve and never come back or come back injured and forgotten?

A Bridge Art Fair too far maybe?

And by the way Daily Mail, it's UNION FLAG not friggin Union Jack.
 
#12
IMO, HRH should sue the ass off them (artist, organisers, hotel etc..) & give the money to the ABF, SSAFA etc..
If the artist is a Yank & has displayed the item in the USA, sue them over there as well - money's better! :D
Can an "artist" do this kind of thing without permission from the victim, especially a serving member of the Armed Forces? Isn't it invasion of privacy or something?? :?
 

mysteron

LE
Book Reviewer
#13
Tartan_Terrier said:
What are you on?

This thread is about a tacky, tasteless statue made by some idiot yank 'artist', and has nothing to do with Prince Harry. Inanimate objects don't have persec issues.
I am not disagreeing with you, but you are talking about a serving officer.

Anything to do with the farce surrounding 'people whose lives were so affected by Princess Diana' - like this idiot is not worthy of comment. Indeed have you thought that Prince Harry may read ARRSE and may not appreciate everyone second guessing how he feels about this sh!te.

Most people don't like having their lives aired in public and as a member of the Royal Family, he gets more than his fair share. He is a fellow serving member of the Armed Forces. Let's leave it out here.

That is my point.
 
#14
mysteron said:
Tartan_Terrier said:
What are you on?

This thread is about a tacky, tasteless statue made by some idiot yank 'artist', and has nothing to do with Prince Harry. Inanimate objects don't have persec issues.
I am not disagreeing with you, but you are talking about a serving officer.

Anything to do with the farce surrounding 'people whose lives were so affected by Princess Diana' - like this idiot is not worthy of comment. Indeed have you thought that Prince Harry may read ARRSE and may not appreciate everyone second guessing how he feels about this sh!te.

Most people don't like having their lives aired in public and as a member of the Royal Family, he gets more than his fair share. He is a fellow serving member of the Armed Forces. Let's leave it out here.

That is my point.
Surely he's talking about a statue of a serving officer?
 
#15
mysteron said:
Tartan_Terrier said:
What are you on?

This thread is about a tacky, tasteless statue made by some idiot yank 'artist', and has nothing to do with Prince Harry. Inanimate objects don't have persec issues.
I am not disagreeing with you, but you are talking about a serving officer.

Anything to do with the farce surrounding 'people whose lives were so affected by Princess Diana' - like this idiot is not worthy of comment. Indeed have you thought that Prince Harry may read ARRSE and may not appreciate everyone second guessing how he feels about this sh!te.

Most people don't like having their lives aired in public and as a member of the Royal Family, he gets more than his fair share. He is a fellow serving member of the Armed Forces. Let's leave it out here.

That is my point.
I've always suspected that he is Sergei
 
#17
Here's my 2p's worth.

Selling art is all about matching the right story to the right product. You could get a group of Nuns to poo in a zinc bucket. In all reality it's a pile of poo with the value of zero. Now if you take that bucket of Nun's poo and sell it as "Holy outrage on modern politics", place it in a good gallery you could sell it for ten's of thousands. But it is still just a pile of poo.

I think the artist did the sculpture of a "Random Dead Officer" first then had to come up with a good sales pitch to shift it hence the Price Harry angel. Bad Taste if you ask me, Very bad taste!
"Any Publicity is Good Publicity" looks like he just want some free publicity.
 
#20
Its a bunch of guff for the luvie lefties who while abhoring all we stand for are trying to bask in our reflected glory even though they haven't the courage to actually do anything themselves. A load of bollox.

And mysteron, get a grip you whining tart.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Latest Threads