Army Rumour Service

Register a free account today to join our community
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site, connect with other members through your own private inbox and will receive smaller adverts!

SPS SOLDIER AT BIG H clearly not ??WITH FINGERS IN THE TILL

Not guilty doesn't mean innocent.

Anybody who hides hundreds of thousands of dollars in plant pots is guilty of something.

I doubt this story has ended.
 
asr1 said:
Not guilty doesn't mean innocent.

Anybody who hides hundreds of thousands of dollars in plant pots is guilty of something.

I doubt this story has ended.

If you say so Columbo.
 
Papa_Lazarou said:
For all those who are born again christians, bear in mind right and wrong are just perspectives from different viewpoints at this point.

For all those who are born again christians, you are a bunch of absolute fucking idiots. No offence.

asr1 said:
Well done to him for earning $4122 A DAY profit (in sequentially numbered $100 bills) whilst operationally deployed through running an unofficial "tuck shop".

What an awesome worker. Imagine he worked 14 hours solid per day in his tuckshop, without any break whatsoever and without going to work (i.e. what he was out there to do) at all, that's still around five bucks-a-minute! Meanwhile lads are out on the ground dodging brass. What a wonderful entrepreneur and not a thieving cnut at all. Makes you proud to be British!

I wonder if there was a bit of mutual silence going on. If you didn't see me I didn't see you....

Biscuits_AB said:
Irrelevant clap-trap. If the man has been found not guilty, then he has committed no wrong.

Not guilty does not mean someone hasn't done anything wrong. It means that there is insufficient proof or technical evidence to obtain a guilty verdict beyond all reasonable doubt.

For example, who really believes O J Simpson was innocent? What about gangsters like John Gotti or Curtis Warren? ******* champion Michael Barrymore, Neverland freak Michael Jackson and so on?

It's really wierd. Here's someone who appears to be so savvy with money that he is able to make unfeasibly huge amounts of money while deployed on ops, but he doesn't realise that his "well earned" cash would be better in a bank account where it can earn interest. Instead he thinks that stashed under ceramic plant pots is a surefire answer to the credit crunch and something that doesn't look at all dishonest? How very intriguing. "Hidden money officer? Crikey...I forgot all about it".

Ultimately, he got away with it. I hope the rest of his career is equally fortuitous.
 
You don't honestly use the expression 'Crikey' in everyday circumstances, do you Dwarf?
 
PoisonDwarf said:
Biscuits_AB said:
Irrelevant clap-trap. If the man has been found not guilty, then he has committed no wrong.

Not guilty does not mean someone hasn't done anything wrong. It means that there is insufficient proof or technical evidence to obtain a guilty verdict beyond all reasonable doubt.

For example, who really believes O J Simpson was innocent? What about gangsters like John Gotti or Curtis Warren? ******* champion Michael Barrymore, Neverland freak Michael Jackson and so on?

It's really wierd. Here's someone who appears to be so savvy with money that he is able to make unfeasibly huge amounts of money while deployed on ops, but he doesn't realise that his "well earned" cash would be better in a bank account where it can earn interest. Instead he thinks that stashed under ceramic plant pots is a surefire answer to the credit crunch and something that doesn't look at all dishonest? How very intriguing. "Hidden money officer? Crikey...I forgot all about it".

Ultimately, he got away with it. I hope the rest of his career is equally fortuitous.

What you are saying there may be true, possibly likely. Would you like to change the burden of evidence? I rather like the "innocent until proven guilty" weighting. It is relatively simple to prove guilt but damned near impossible to prove innocence.
 
Biscuits_AB said:
Irrelevant clap-trap. If the man has been found not guilty, then he has committed no wrong. And your pretence that you may 'know' something, matters not. In the eyes of the law he is an innocent man. Live with it.

....and Biscuits **** Blocking, I think it's YOU!!
 
I know most of you have heard of SAS and SBS. I am just surprised that you were not aware that SPS is the highly secretive Special Pen Service.

They do extensive training at a secret base near Worthy Down on how to make lots of exciting things happen to soldiers around the world. They have a secret headquarters known as JPA which is capable of all sorts of devilry. Just try anoying one of these SPS warriors and watch how your pay suddenly disappears and no-one can ever be found accountable.

Clearly the "special pen" they are issued to use on the accounts works better than the cloak and dagger issued to ordinary special forces.

I am surprised that the famous Walt Hunters of ARRSE do not have to spend more of their time trying to find and expose the SPS impersonators.
 
bitterandtwisted said:
My monies on that he is now the treasurer

Bet they have some cracking functions using the extra curricular cashstreams he's able to generate!

It is my understanding that the evidence regarding the sales of viagra couldn't stand up in court. Boom tish. :oops:
 
Interesting.
Viagra is a prescribed drug, under Military Law which comes under British Law it is illegal for him to sell it or have it in his possession for sale.

How fecking useless are the crims in NI these days? 200 grand under a plant pot outside the house! Try living in London mate they'd ave ad yer plantpot years ago and rolled you for the viagra.
 
So was any money actually ever mssing from Stirling Lines? Or did someone simply conclude there must be due to him having all this money? What a farce.
 
Biscuits_AB said:
Papa_Lazarou said:
Biscuits_AB said:
Papa_Lazarou said:
No-one wants to delve into Iraq and money in that community. Quite why anyone even started is beyond any level of understanding.

For all those who are born again christians, bear in mind right and wrong are just perspectives from different viewpoints at this point.

Yeah, right on man.

(WTF has he been smoking?)

I dont smoke.

The whole article, and event is easily understood given a few pieces of information, which appears now not to be in the public domain.

With those parts of the puzzle, in this case, right and wrong are not as clear cut from the reading end of the newspaper.

Irrelevant clap-trap. If the man has been found not guilty, then he has committed no wrong. And your pretence that you may 'know' something, matters not. In the eyes of the law he is an innocent man. Live with it.

I rather thought the intent of the article was that the reader was supposed to see a bloke having done something getting off, whereas my suggestion was that posession of the full facts may explain why he was always going to be found not guilty, mainly because he was.

The thrust of my point, which seems lost now, was why given the knowledge surrounding the events, there was even the suggestion let alone the GCM.

I would suggest that that is neither irrelevant, not "claptrap", but then i suppose I would wouldn't I.

But happy to delete any post that you don't want to see, after all its all about you and your omnipotent understanding and experience of all things Army.
 
CRmeansCeilingReached said:
Papa_Lazarou said:
Biscuits_AB said:
Papa_Lazarou said:
No-one wants to delve into Iraq and money in that community. Quite why anyone even started is beyond any level of understanding.

For all those who are born again christians, bear in mind right and wrong are just perspectives from different viewpoints at this point.

Yeah, right on man.

(WTF has he been smoking?)

I dont smoke.

The whole article, and event is easily understood given a few pieces of information, which appears now not to be in the public domain.

With those parts of the puzzle, in this case, right and wrong are not as clear cut from the reading end of the newspaper
.

either tell us what you are on about, or stop babbling bullshit. :roll:

You get what I mean or you don't. Not quite sure what actual "bullshit" has been "babbled" since I didnt actually say anything specifically, other than suggesting there may be more to this than the newspaper reports, which I know is a stretch to believe, bearing in mind their meticulous research and un-relenting honesty, together with their excellent insight into past and present Uk Ops.
 
*papa lazarou sits smugger than a smug thing, beaming like a smarmy cunt because he knows something nobody else does*

i'm sure there is more to it than meets the eye. but if you claim to know some little piece of the jigsaw which proves to the cynics (not just the court) that he is innocent, why not share it. sure he won't mind. because this is one of those "no smoke without fire" things, where people will always wonder about his trustworthyness unless they are told how he really got the money.

otherwise, why not be quiet, lest you be thought as boring as those officers who come in telling you they have some big secret, but can't tell you what it is. :roll:
 

New posts

Top