spot the difference

#1





will we see tony plastering his boat all over the uk in the run up to the election, wanting us to bow down and worship. i would not be surprised.

it better not be the wide mouthed frog either............
 
#2
one of thems got a spiffy moustache :lol:
and not been accused of being an idiot
 
#3
It's a close one right enough....

they both have the same false, smug sh*t-eating grin!

8O
 
#4
One of them was not properly elected, governed through fear, funded OSL, and launched a war against an middle eastern country which wasted lots of lives, and the other is Saddam Hussein....
 
#5
will we see tony plastering his boat all over the uk in the run up to the election, wanting us to bow down and worship. i would not be surprised.
Unlikely, as his party view him as a serious electoral problem. This is a shame, because I would be out with the spray can! :twisted:
 
#6
ViroBono said:
One of them was not properly elected, governed through fear, funded OSL, and launched a war against an middle eastern country which wasted lots of lives, and the other is Saddam Hussein....
classic... :lol:
 
#7
ViroBono said:
One of them was not properly elected, governed through fear, funded OSL, and launched a war against an middle eastern country which wasted lots of lives, and the other is Saddam Hussein....
Really? Elaborate. on "not properly elected, governed through fear"
 
#11
RCSignals said:
ViroBono said:
One of them was not properly elected, governed through fear, funded OSL, and launched a war against an middle eastern country which wasted lots of lives, and the other is Saddam Hussein....
Really? Elaborate. on "not properly elected, governed through fear"
I refer, of course, to the shambles surrounding the chimp's first election, and his subsequent use of the fear of terrorism to introduce legislation and as an election strategy. I did not mention links with unsavoury Middle Eastern rulers (Saudi, to save you asking).
 
#13
ViroBono said:
RCSignals said:
ViroBono said:
One of them was not properly elected, governed through fear, funded OSL, and launched a war against an middle eastern country which wasted lots of lives, and the other is Saddam Hussein....
Really? Elaborate. on "not properly elected, governed through fear"
I refer, of course, to the shambles surrounding the chimp's first election, and his subsequent use of the fear of terrorism to introduce legislation and as an election strategy. I did not mention links with unsavoury Middle Eastern rulers (Saudi, to save you asking).
Shambles? I suppose only because the loser kept wanting a recount even though he kept losing. Something like what I hear is going on in the US Washington State right now.

The fear of terrorism thing is an interesting one. The Democratic party is actually guilty of both. When it suited them they claimed credit for the legislation, and the department of Homeland Security, and pushing Bush to create both. I saw more "fear" rhetoric from them than from Bush.

They, and Mikey Moore, of course wouldn't agree.

and I thank you for saving me from asking.
 

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top