split from

#2
arby said:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1284783,00.html

nevermind p1ssing on mongs, this really facks me off. It also appears judges struggle with basic maths.
You just don't understand!

It was the owner of the Lamborghini's fault that his car was vandalised! He, one of the rich property-owners, mocked this down-trodden lad by owning such a vehicle and it was only right that his property be criminally damaged to pay him back for such vulgar flaunting of his wealth...

:roll:
 
#3
I thought from the title of this thread that this was a competition that you could enter. :cry: I thought I stood quite a good chance.

Never mind.

I think people with twenty grand sports cars are cnuts too.

Edited to add, in the light of subsequent posts

£150k?

On a car?!

Blimey.

A right cnut.
 
#4
Spot on Dozy - however, if it was an Aston Martin DB9 I'd say the little prick should be hung, drawn and quartered for defacing a work of automotive art! :evil:

Edited to add can Dilfor tell me where I can get a new Lambo for twenty grand?
 
#5
What really gets me is why does he only pay £1000 when he did £20000 damage? or did I miss a bit?

The chav twit
 
#7
arby said:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1284783,00.html

nevermind p1ssing on mongs, this really facks me off. It also appears judges struggle with basic maths.
and what makes you think the judge should have made the poor bloke pay the full amount of damage????

it wasn't his fault, he probably came from a broken home and had a hard life in when he was put in care!!!!

think before you judge :D
 
#8
REgards said:
Spot on Dozy - however, if it was an Aston Martin DB9 I'd say the little prick should be hung, drawn and quartered for defacing a work of automotive art! :evil:
Ooooooh, I'd have boiled his testicles in acid had he done that! :twisted:
 
#9
DozyBint said:
REgards said:
Spot on Dozy - however, if it was an Aston Martin DB9 I'd say the little prick should be hung, drawn and quartered for defacing a work of automotive art! :evil:
Ooooooh, I'd have boiled his testicles in acid had he done that! :twisted:
Hopefully with aformentioned chav still attached? Then when the skin is raw and bleeding set the pigs on him! (Hannibal stylee not the police)
 
#10
admittedly, anyone who drives a lambo is fairly low down the food chain. I think his community service will be promoting "rights for nonces" in prisons. :twisted:
 
#11
DozyBint said:
You just don't understand!

It was the owner of the Lamborghini's fault that his car was vandalised! He, one of the rich property-owners, mocked this down-trodden lad by owning such a vehicle and it was only right that his property be criminally damaged to pay him back for such vulgar flaunting of his wealth...

:roll:
Dozy, your real name's Frankie Hulme, isn't it?

REgards said:
Spot on Dozy - however, if it was an Aston Martin DB9 I'd say the little prick should be hung, drawn and quartered for defacing a work of automotive art! :evil:
Astons? Cars for poofs, IMO :D
 
#14
The fact that he could afford the car in the first place would suggest that he has a very good job or rich parentage. Which can only mean, he must have been a c**t to some poor c**t in the past and therefore the c**t deserved it. :D

Jealous? Of course not, Im happy with my roller skates.
 
#15
DozyBint said:
Dilfor said:
I think people with twenty grand sports cars are cnuts too.
Christ knows what you think of people with £150,000 cars! ;)
_______________________________________________________
That they are able to afford to engage some Ex-Spetnatz chaps, plenty about in London, and I do know of some to have a little 'chat' with those three misunderstood lads to set them straight about their place in society....
 
#16
STOP PRESS....

New contender for cnut of the year has been found.....

All competition have been left standing in their crushed sports cars by this amazing display of self-aggrandising waltishness......

And the winner of this year's Cnut of the Year is...............

StevenPreece (author and ex-Bootneck - apparently)







See yesterday's rash of posts all about him. Cnut.
 
#17
Cheers 5.56short: When I joined the Corps it was 7.62 and SLRs. We trialled the SA80 5.56mm weapons in the arctic in the late 80's and they were crap. The barrels were bending with the heat exchange during live firing and they easily got clogged up with snow. However, apparently it was the way to go!! :D



Cheers

Steve
 
#18
#19
#20
StevenPreece said:
Cheers 5.56short: When I joined the Corps it was 7.62 and SLRs. We trialled the SA80 5.56mm weapons in the arctic in the late 80's and they were crap. The barrels were bending with the heat exchange during live firing and they easily got clogged up with snow. However, apparently it was the way to go!! :D



Cheers

Steve
Yes and it was all fields round here when I was a girl...tell the young that and they don't want to know!
 

Latest Threads