Speed of Promotion in the Rifles

Discussion in 'Army Reserve' started by StabTiffy2B, Jan 6, 2009.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. I've had a good think on whether to start this topic or not. However, my curiosity has got the better of me.

    Sjt Chris Reed has been the latest casualty in Helmand. I've read his colleagues comments on Defence Intranet and clearly he was a top bloke. However, this sentence caught my eye:

    Is it usual for someone to make Sjt after 7 years? Can you really gain the required knowledge in such a short time? I know we've had quite a few threads on the speed of promotion for Scalies, but this is even quicker.

    Let's not turn this thread into another RIP one, nor start on the "you're disrespecting him" nonsense.

    Cheers.
     

  2. I've had a good think about this. 2001 was 8 years ago.
     
  3. Lmao! All quiet on the western front.
     
  4. Well spotted. Proof reading is for winners. :oops:

    Original Post edited.
     
  5. Promotion is down to the individual one doing the write courses to qualify, and two being a fu**ing good egg all round. This guy obviously met the criteria (read the full MOD page regarding kind words said by TA and Regs, he was well liked and good at his job)
     
  6. StabTiffy2B

    The average time in service before promotion to Sjt (across the Infantry, not just The Rifles) is 13.5 years according to the MS/RCMO and my anecdotal observation suggests that The Rifles are typical in this. It is certainly possible to make Sjt in 7-8 years, but it is far from the usual experience especially given the three courses that he had to have passed (by no means attendance only courses) to have been eligible. I would suggest that Sjt Reed's performance must have been consistently far above average and that he must have been an exceptional soldier.
     
  7. My bold. Which appears to be the opinion of all of those who have made comments on the MOD page.

    RIP a very good man.
     
  8. With the amount of tours one can do in a 7 or 8 year time frame i'm not surprised at this. At Chilwell I met a guy who was only 19 but had done a tour P coy and was a PTI and was about to get his second tape. There are some real fliers around and fair play to em. If you can pass the courses and have done the tours then why not?
     
  9. The_Duke

    The_Duke LE Moderator

    Possible? Yes.

    Usual? No.

    He must have passed his recruit course, PJNCO cadre, Section Commanders course and Pl Sgts course (or specialist weapons equivalent). He must have also had a strong recommend to promote in each SJAR, and picked up at first look each time as you usually require 2 SJARs in rank to promote.

    He obviously had the capabilities to do well on the courses, and the SJARs written to reflect this. Whether he had the experience that someone with longer in each rank would have had is very much up to the individual concerned. It could be that in each of his 2 or so years in rank he crammed in every exercise possible, and therefore he had more experience than someone who had held the same rank for 5 years but only turned up for the jollies and the odd range day. Edit: His previous tour of Iraq answers this one in spades.

    http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/MilitaryOperations/SergeantCraigBrelsfordAndPrivateJohanBothaKilledInAfghanistan.htm

    Link above shows that it is also possible to be A/Sgt at 25 in the regular army, and do a bloody good job at it too.
     
  10. I don't want to get into defensive postings here, its an important issue but let's give Chris Reed some credit. I knew this man well and can add some subjective clarity.

    He was undoubtedly an intelligent, talented and dedicated soldier who well deserved his rank. He consistently showed his capability, often in testing circumstances including an arduous deployemnt on TELIC. The trust in his capability is clearly demonstrated by the very pragmatic CO of 1 RIFLES, selecting him for OMLT tasking. Further testament is borne by the comments of RSM 1 RIFLES.

    It might be worth mentioning that not only had he attended and done well on the mainstream promotion courses inc snr's but he had also crammed in SF Comd's - where his report reflected his ability - very high.

    Admitedly, the timescale is quick in 'old money', but the pace or tempo of Ops, trg and the aggregate experience gained by a capabale and thrusting NCO can enable this rate of promotion.

    The point is, in this day and age intelligent and very capable NCOs can gain the experience to hold this rank in this timescale.

    Its something I think we'll see more of!

    Territorials are sometimes deploying on a higher cycle rate than their regular counterparts!
     
  11. You're right about trying to make a comparison with the past. Times of high operational tempo always result in 'quick promotions'- the environment goes from 'career' to 'getting the best man in the job'. Think of the ages of Colonels and RSMs in the Second World War.

    This applies to the TA especially. Let's face it, the TA is full of some remarkable people.
     
  12. I was under the impression that the minimum time served in ranks was: Pte - 6 months, LCpl - 2 years, Cpl - 5 years. Anything after that was on merit. So as has been mentioned before to get to Sgt (or Sjt) in 8 years is feasible but not usually possible.
     
  13. ugly

    ugly LE Moderator

    There is no minimum on service in each rank nor maximum, I knew some real fliers and some that could only fly after they left.
     
  14. The_Duke

    The_Duke LE Moderator

    You are now expected to have two reports in rank for consideration at a promotion board, although there are specific circumstances which can amend this.
     
  15. He was no doubt an expceptional soldier, and RIP to him.

    You weren't his OC, or in his CoC by any chance were you?