Sort Britain out before the rest of the world ie:Africa

#1
I for one am getting fed up of all the dribble about giving money to Africa and other third world countries.
Britain has got homeless people everywhere, yet no one gives a sh1t, they are more concerned about the rest of the world then our own nation.

Your thoughts please fellow arrse members?.
 
#2
I think this has been covered before on other friends, and the general consensus was....

Stop all aid to India...if they can afford Nukes & Spaceships they can sort their own poor out

Africa is so corrupt there is no point pouring millions in when it won't get to those who need it
 
#4
Simple answer Tech me ol fruit, dont donate any of your hard earned cash to causes that you dont agree with. I donote to UK based charites that have affected my life in 1 way or another over the years. Africa can go swivel as far as i am concerned and as blonde guy said its so corrupt its unreal and people like Bono and Bob Geldof cant make a difference.
 
#7
CombatCarer said:
It will never happen, because to do so would mean that the Broon and his crew would have to admit that Britain is fcuked
Everybody knows it is, they just need to pull there thumbs out of each others arrse's.
 
#9
warrior8234mkIIIA2 said:
Simple answer Tech me ol fruit, dont donate any of your hard earned cash to causes that you dont agree with. I donote to UK based charites that have affected my life in 1 way or another over the years. Africa can go swivel as far as i am concerned and as blonde guy said its so corrupt its unreal and people like Bono and Bob Geldof cant make a difference.
Well apart from your share of the £9 BILLION that our wonderfully generous government takes of our money and gives away of course.
 
#10
Mr_Deputy said:
johnboyzzz said:
Woofer829 said:
johnboyzzz said:
Send it to Scotland instead.

Hope this helps :)
We already have. Scotland got £47 billion last year via the Barnett formula.
Well you can give us more, after all it was your lots fault we need it. :twisted:
What does England get in compensation for the handy work of the shite-awful Scottish politicians we have been infested with for the last 13 years? Plus probably the next 4 - Cameron is hardly an original anglo-Saxon. surname. 20 years of 'dooooooooom.'
And what of the politicians you have foisted on us for a couple of CENTURIES :twisted:
 
#11
So Gordon Brown was part of a massive jockaniese a revenge plot? Makes sense....
 
#13
Woofer829 said:
johnboyzzz said:
Woofer829 said:
johnboyzzz said:
Send it to Scotland instead.

Hope this helps :)
We already have. Scotland got £47 billion last year via the Barnett formula.
Well you can give us more, after all it was your lots fault we need it. :twisted:
Why do you need more. Has the price of 'Buckie' risen? :D
Couldn't tell you, but the price of my red vin rouge has :p
 

OldSnowy

LE
Moderator
Book Reviewer
#14
Woofer829 said:
johnboyzzz said:
Woofer829 said:
johnboyzzz said:
Send it to Scotland instead.

Hope this helps :)
We already have. Scotland got £47 billion last year via the Barnett formula.
Well you can give us more, after all it was your lots fault we need it. :twisted:
Why do you need more. Has the price of 'Buckie' risen? :D
No, they need it to pay for subsidised prescription charges, healthcare in general, higher education, and care for the old folk.

Without the subsidy, even fewer would vote Labour - and then where would the scots Government (the one in Westminster, that is) be? :)
 
#15
OldSnowy said:
Woofer829 said:
johnboyzzz said:
Woofer829 said:
johnboyzzz said:
Send it to Scotland instead.

Hope this helps :)
We already have. Scotland got £47 billion last year via the Barnett formula.
Well you can give us more, after all it was your lots fault we need it. :twisted:
Why do you need more. Has the price of 'Buckie' risen? :D
No, they need it to pay for subsidised prescription charges, healthcare in general, higher education, and care for the old folk.

Without the subsidy, even fewer would vote Labour - and then where would the scots Government (the one in Westminster, that is) be? :)
Have any parties vowed to end this, as well as sort out the West Lothian problem?
 
#17
as somebody wjho has worked witrth the homeless the majority are drunk or drugged or mad or all three.
in the 3rd world you can do a hell of a lot good with very small amounts of cash rather than the vast amount of cash it costs to keep 20 or so homeless people in a rather scabby hostel. :x
 
#18
techgerman said:
Britain has got homeless people everywhere
And I, for one, am quite envious of them.
With just the mortgage, council tax, utilities, insurances, broadband, tv licence and window cleaner, my home costs me almost £3k PCM.
People without homes must be loaded.
 
#19
brighton hippy said:
as somebody wjho has worked witrth the homeless the majority are drunk or drugged or mad or all three.
in the 3rd world you can do a hell of a lot good with very small amounts of cash rather than the vast amount of cash it costs to keep 20 or so homeless people in a rather scabby hostel. :x
The 3rd world can help itself. Not my problem.
 

OldSnowy

LE
Moderator
Book Reviewer
#20
brighton hippy said:
as somebody wjho has worked witrth the homeless the majority are drunk or drugged or mad or all three.
in the 3rd world you can do a hell of a lot good with very small amounts of cash rather than the vast amount of cash it costs to keep 20 or so homeless people in a rather scabby hostel. :x
It's true - I keep hearing adverts saying that "for just £5 a month" I could provide little Johnny with clean water and access to education.

I wish I knew how they did it - it costs me a bloody fortune to do that! :)
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top