No benefits and you die I cannot for the life of me see what the issue is here? If the scounging low lifes die because their benefits are reduced then surely that's a saving (note that it's not a cut!). So I reckon the Coalition should be encouraging them to smoke and drink more, therefore maximising revenue for a short period; and then when the fuckers peg it considerable savings are made. Perhaps I should suggest this on that public servant's website thingy? Any support?