Or an alternative example - https://www.arrse.co.uk/community/threads/site-penis-of-the-year.302689/#post-10397430Are you ******* kidding me? Its like a playground in here.
I nominate X. but I won't say why.
******* brilliant eh, give me something to work with, lads.
We have had yet another year of first class bellendery and yet there is only a handful of actual evidence of certain people acting like penises.
This is what should be happening.
To use Bugsy as an example (because he is ineligible for nomination)
I nominate Bugsy because he is a lying fuckwit who pretended that he had volunteered his medical skills to the NHS during the covid crisis.
This is despite him being in a high risk group that the NHS don't want, but even if his military career wasn't made up its doubtful the NHS are screaming out for medical skills last used 48 years ago.
I would then post a link to his lie (and probably a few more to various meltdowns during the the year.
Over to you idle *******.
Ugly's Bulk BB Ignore thread was a view halloo for the site's weaker weevils competing to say who was the most utterly vociferously and totally unbothered about me.
It’s Friday night.
It’s turps o’clock.
And yet, again, our resident pigeon shouter is taking time away from his brasso and Toilet Duck cocktail hour to tell @emcon Econcon to give his head a wobble. Again.
What more proof do we need?
There is greatness in our midst. If anyone can make Bugsy sound statesmanlike, that person deserves the SPOTY title.
Here is Bugsy’s latest post (post #51715) on the Trump Presidency thread, in reply to our permawibbling candidate’s post #51705:
“Your determination to find "something wrong" is bordering on the insane. Those courts and state secretaries you mentioned in your post didn't refuse anything, but they demanded viable and verifiable proof before acting. Let's not forget that Dipshit Donny and his bunch of loonies have, to date, lost 37 court cases. Does that not tell you something about the quality of "evidence" they're presenting?
Your last sentence is actually the clincher. I quote: "Why anyone on the Trump side would believe people who have lost objectivity is beyond me." Are you really implying that your man there and his minions are in any way "impartial" themselves? They were been honking on about "fraud" even before the elections started. So when it was all over, off they went looking for "fraud". A sort of "we already have the result, now let's find the proof" exercise. You really should give your dumpling a good wobble”.