Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Amazon
eBay
Navy Net
Menu
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Featured threads
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New reviews
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
Test
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
Book Reviews
Latest reviews
Search reviews
ARRSEPedia
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Help ARRSE
Amazon Referral
Ebay Referral
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Featured threads
Search forums
Forums
Boards by Arm / Service (roughly)
Royal Navy
Sir John Parker's National Shipbuilding Strategy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Simpering Civvie, post: 7583659, member: 132837"] I commented in the T26 thread a while back that BAE was taking the piss. They had the government over a barrel on pricing and my view was that either the government nationalised the maritime arm (rarely a good thing), or they allowed rival contractors to bid for programmes. It seems the report came to the same conclusion. I do have two questions though: 1) will BAE be part of the T31 "Alliance"? 2) What meaningful work is intended for the Clyde yards after T26? I worry that without a drumbeat of ship build and new designs (T45 replacement?), we might see the same thing that happened with Astute (and with the USN surface ship orders) repeat itself. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Boards by Arm / Service (roughly)
Royal Navy
Sir John Parker's National Shipbuilding Strategy
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
What's new
Log in
Register
Search
Top
