Sino-Japanese Friction

Discussion in 'Current Affairs, News and Analysis' started by Not_Whistlin_Dixie, Apr 17, 2005.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. There have been anti-Japanese demonstrations and riots as recently as today in Shanghai, Zhuhai, Dongguan, and other locations.

    The Chinese and Japanese foreign ministers met at Beijing.

    The Japanese foreign minister solicited an apology for damage to Japanese-owned businesses.

    The Chinese foreign minister declared that no apology will be forthcoming.

    "China rejects Japan's demand for apology"

    Some principal points of contention.

    1. The Japanese Ministry of Education has come out with a line of textbooks which, Chinese critics say, short-shrift Japanese atrocities that were an aspect of the Japanese invasion of China.

    2. Chinese resent Japan's bid to obtain permanent membership in the U.N. Security Council.

    3. China has, in recent years, become a net oil importer. Proponents of the "Peak Oil" hypothesis assert that global oil production has peaked and will decline hereafter. I have read that China views with particular annoyance commencement of offshore geophysical drilling for natural gas by the Japanese in waters as to which China claims priority.

    4. I have read expressions of anger by Japanese authorities over the policy of the Chinese central bank of pegging the renminbi to the U.S. dollar. Every time the dollar declines in the foreign exchange market (which has been the trend for about the last three years), Chinese goods become cheaper (in local currency terms) in markets in which Chinese and Japanese sellers compete.

    5. Japan may be making its first tentative moves in the direction of rearmament.
  2. Govenor of the Chinese central bank has previously gone on record: we aren't going to allow the renminbi to rise against the U.S. dollar.

    "Zhou rules out move to revalue renminbi" 29 March 2005

    It's not just the Japanese who are (mostly very quietly) steaming over this. Most of the G7 powers have said the same with growing urgency.

    Punitive U.S. tariffs against Chinese goods are likely to pass in Congress if China doesn't allow the renminbi to float.

    The renminbi/dollar peg enabled China rapidly to industrialize at the price of accumulating the world's second largest accumulation of U.S. Treasury securities with the attendant risk of getting scalped through dollar devaluations.
  3. bit rich of the japos to demand an apology when they refuse to apologise over their treatment of POWS and occupied territories including enforced prositution of korean women. :evil:
  4. I'm with the Chinese until the Japs offer an apology for their conduct of the war at least, I'm not so bothered about the war itself - the US did rather push them into it - but the treatment of prisoners (both civilian and military) and conquered peoples was inexcusable.
  5. What are the Chinese going to do, crush a few japanese tourists under the tracks of tanks unless they apologise for their human rights record?
  6. that would be nice
  7. Push? After the Rape of Nanking, it was a no-brainer. Either we took steps to try and contain the "Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere" by blocking their access to oil, or we could have waited until they attempted an invasion of the US mainland itself. Granted it's not YOUR country, it's still a bit bothersome to us here on this side of the pond.

    They invade SE Asia;
    We threaten embargo and other actions;
    They plan, and execute, a brilliant sneak attack to decapitate our sea power;
    We return the favor by decapitating the entire country. Took almost four years; but FDR wanted us to help you guys first...
  8. Nikkei 225 stock index closed Monday down 432.25, a decline of 3.80%.
  9. I'd like China to start to acknowledge its own crimes against its own people before complaining about the Japs. What Mao and his policies did to the Chinese during the "great leap forward" makes the body-count of the Rape of Nanking look like a section battle drill.
  10. Goatman

    Goatman LE Book Reviewer

    Good book on this: << Tokyo Station >> by Martin Cruz -Smith

    Excellent background stuff.

    incidentally, the stuff about the Rape of Nanking is not exaggerated:
    there were two Imperial Army officers who had a bet who could take off a hundred heads with his sword first...the winner took 105, duly reported in the Japan Times with approval.....

    Not all Japanese are ignorant and /or self-deluded about why everyone else in East Asia hates and fears them.

    I recently came across a website run by some women who were curious why so many Commonwealth servicemen were buried in their local cemetery. They did some research and found most had died in captivity whilst engaged in slave-labour on various projects in the locality.

    Site includes names, dates and cause of death of about 1500 Brits.

    How FEPOWs can find it in their hearts to forgive is a source of utter amazement to me....

    Le Chevre
  11. We cant change the past, and all the apologies in the world will not bring one person back to life.

    The worrying thing about the current dituation is the fact that China now feels confident enough to push its claims.

    The oilfield in question is one of the few unexploited reserves in the area, the other is around the Spratley islands in the South China Sea which China also claims. When taken in conjunction with an agrssive resource aqusition program in Africa, the Chinese seem to be laying claim to there share of the world deminishing resources.

    I have a nasty feeling that the Dragon may have woken up. Mind you at least it will make a nice change from the desert. :!:
  12. OldSnowy

    OldSnowy LE Moderator Book Reviewer

    I understand that the History Book in question is NOT being used in the vast majority of Japanese schools - and while not exactly a fan of the Japs (My Old Man would turn in his grave if I was :? ) the Chinese are stoking this for political reasons, as mentioned above.

    As to Chinese 'realism' in teaching history - they teach that:

    - Tibet was never an independent Country, but has always been part of China

    - that the Tianamen demonstrations were part of a counter-revolutionary plot to destroy the 'People's Republic', and best of all

    - that the USA started the Korean War by invading the North :)

    They are trying to stop Japan getting a permanent seat on the UNSC. What they will probably acheive is a militarised, nuclear-capable Japan.... scary, or what?

    For more info, check the Web for references to the 'lost' 200kg of Plutonium in Japan a few years ago. THey have one of the most advanced civil nuclear programmes in the world, so it wouldn't take them long to go for it if pushed - say, by N Korea setting one off.
  13. The Japanese have been apologising to the Asian countries numerous times. (also pays compensations just like the Germans). The number of formal apologies is counted up to no less than seventeen times to the Chinese.(for Asian countries as a whole, they have made at least 32 appologies). And they still claim that the Japanese have not apologised. It has been seen that some Chinese people have sincerely believe that the Japanese never apologised. (FYI: first apology was dated in 1972. Since then the Japanese consistently giving apologies up until now.)

    In Chinese country, the victims of the Nanking is reported to be 300,000 which would have over-crowded Nanking (According to American sources). For your information, the atrocity committed by the Chinese on the Tibetan people has victims of 1,200,000; one in fifth of Tibetan people was the victim. The Chinese have never admitted to the crime nor apologised to the Tibetan people. Scary thing is, the war-crime by the Chinese still continues to the current day.

    It is odd for the Chinese to criticise that the Japanese does not teach its history when obviously the Chinese does not teach the correct history of their own to their own people.

    It is also unacceptable to even argue that Japanese does not deserve a permanent seat in the UN Security Council when the Chinese deserves the least because of the Tibet atrocity.

    However what is really wrong about these Chinese campaigns is that their source of information based upon which they are demonstrating have never been verified. Mostly the information is from the World Wide Web, and the demonstrations have been arranged by the Hate Websites; (whose web names are shameful to mention).

    I wonder what the majority of the Chinese; i.e. the ones who are NOT in the anti-Japanese campaign, feel about the recent events. Would they still want to develop a good relationship with the Japanese, just like majority of Japanese would like to.
  14. If they ever did that, they'd raise a dangerous question of their entitlement to rule China.

    Not only does the Chinese government not discuss this topic, I've read that, so far as they are able, they go to a good deal of trouble to make sure that their subjects don't discuss it either.

    They have a very well developed system of internet censorship.