For War Crimes that is, for allegedly faking the evidence for the invasion of Iraq. I have a fairly austere opinion of him but the evidence is obscure, or perhaps has been obscured. I think that a trial - absolutely not in the UK - would enable documents to be unearthed, persons to be interviewed under oath etc. If he were found guilty he could be punished, if found not guilty it would benefit him as he would be able to wave the verdict in the face of his detractors.
I'm not stupid enough to think that would ever be allowed to happen, but there have been a lot of statements on here about him and it would be interesting to know whether people feel that there is a case to answer.
I'm not stupid enough to think that would ever be allowed to happen, but there have been a lot of statements on here about him and it would be interesting to know whether people feel that there is a case to answer.
Last edited: