She just couldnt wait to spend that money could she......

#2
:D :D :D :D

 
#3
See, you learn something new everyday, I would have thought that you would only have to buy new shoes on their own and not buy the whole leg as well!

Jimima
 
#4
She's now complaining that £35,000 a year for the child is not enough. Given that he is paying child care and any school fees seperatly how the feck can you not provide for a child with that amount of cash?

Misserable little gold digger.
 
#5
bobath said:
She's now complaining that £35,000 a year for the child is not enough. Given that he is paying child care and any school fees seperatly how the feck can you not provide for a child with that amount of cash?

Miserable little gold digger.
Of course the big assumption here is that she will spend it on her daughter and not herself. If she honestly cared about her daughter she wouldn't have behaved so badly throughout the separation etc. Am I the only one who thinks that in this case culling is fully justified :evil:
 
#7
I thought it was a bit strange that she was after more cash from Sir Paul. Her arguments must have been really weak as the judge decided that she did not have a leg to stand on.
 

TheIronDuke

ADC
Book Reviewer
#8
From Babe to Barking Bunny Boiler in 4.0 years. About average I’d say?




Cracking false leg BTW.
 

Biped

LE
Book Reviewer
#9
I can see a new pantomime coming out of this - Puss in Legs!
 

Similar threads

Top