She is probably living on several forced portions of **** each day, all the protein none of the fat, apart from man fat.
I reckon thats nearer the truthIt seems
the brazen hussy is walking around without a veil now. She is trying to appear as Western and non ISIS looking as possible prior to her appeal being heard. Lost a lot of beef. Obviously been on the Kurdish prison camp slim fast diet.trying to look as photogenic as possible to cultivate the usual attractive female = victim status that the tabloids lean towards whenever a female is convicted abroad. Maybe @don't tell him pike will now!
View attachment 552879
The gauntlet has been thrown by the UK govt. All the do-gooders have to do is spring her from the camp . They're fairly well sorted once they get her to CalaisShe is probably living on several forced portions of **** each day, all the protein none of the fat, apart from man fat.
I can’t see the likes of the charity doogooders who traffic illegal immigrants under the thin veil of humanitarian aid not helping her get back.
A big win for those NIMBYs.
...It seems to be one of those powers that's great when you have sensible people in charge, but less so when you have the likes of Corbyn running the show.
It ends up with a country that expels native journalists for writing things the government doesn't like and teachers who teach people how to think.
I concur. I was in Northern Iraq, mostly Mosul and Sinjar, after ISIS had their arses handed back to them by coalition/ISF. We employed Yazidi on to some of our teams and listening to their tales and witnessing the devastation around was horrifying and humbling at the same time.I've personally met with Yazidi's who suffered at the hands of those animals and I can assure you, that the tales of horror are truly beyond comprehension.
The piece of filth being discussed here (for that is what she is) was fully supportive of ISIS, its aims and its actions; and has shown not an ounce of remorse. F*** her, f*** everything about her warped mindset and the sooner the wider world acknowledge that the better (wishful thinking I know....)
And they're both groups with a serious downer on the Front Wheelers, so do you mean Labour is controlled by imams and Blair's supposed conversion to Left Footery was just a subterfuge to confuse the kaffir ?A fair few Labour Grandees were up for it becoming the age of consent (Hodge, Harman &co). Oddly enough, it’s a popular concept amongst followers of the Prophet too.
As a straight statement, I’d agree. However, a working definition of terrorism could be the use of fear to coerce others to adopt a particular creed / opinion / behaviour / other characteristic.That is incorrect. It’s important not to blur the lines of solely criminal activity and terrorist agenda.
I thought I'd remembered seeing that her father was involved with burning the US flag at a protest , however it was the father of one of the other girls
"The father of a schoolgirl feared to have joined Islamic State has insisted he is not an extremist after he went to a protest in which an American flag was burned.
He spoke of his regret at joining the demonstration outside the US Embassy in 2012, according to reports.
Michael Adebowale - one of Fusilier Lee Rigby's killers - is also said to have been present at the rally against controversial film Innocence of Muslims.
Images of the man at the demonstration emerged after his 15-year-old daughter and two teenage friends went missing from their family homes in east London, prompting an international police hunt.
He told The Times:
Bethnal Green Academy pupils Amira, Shamima Begum and Kadiza Sultana are believed to be inside Syria after flying to Turkey on a well-trodden path to the country."
As a straight statement, I’d agree. However, a working definition of terrorism could be the use of fear to coerce others to adopt a particular creed / opinion / behaviour / other characteristic.
At that point, IMHO your binary distinction becomes a bit blurred. Gangs of youths armed with knives attempting to protect their turf is undoubtedly a criminal act but they are also using the fear their behaviour creates as a weapon in itself. Arguably it’s “low level” terrorism but is the act of knifing someone on your patch without your say so any different to caging someone and setting them alight because you don’t sunscibe to the same religious beliefs?
The same can be said of the Muslim gangs roaming East London in their self declared “no alcohol zones”. I was subject to their attentions a few years back when a bunch of us in our mid 50s were out celebrating having met 30 years earlier. Yes, we had a can each to wash down the curry, bought from a shop in the area run by a Muslim, but no, we weren’t exactly drunkenly rioting, just ambling along chatting. The threats and intimidation were criminal as were the attempts to confiscate (steal) the beer but the intent was very much the use of fear to coerce us to abandon the lawful act of drinking alcohol in public.
I would also agree with your later post where you state that the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful and law abiding and that only a very small minority are classified as a terrorist threat. Again, IMHO this is fine as a straight statement but stumbles when looked at more closely. Is the act of tacitly accepting the extremist’s behaviour by not condemning it criminal? No, of course not but is it supporting it? A much more difficult question and I’d suggest that considerably more than those on the various watch lists would fall into this category, the impossible to define “supporters”.
By the same metric, many others, self included could easily be defined as “supporters” of white supremacy extremists in that we find the concept of being subjugated by Islamic fundamentalists under Sharia Law abhorrent. The confusion arises in how you define an extremist / terrorist and at what point behaviour crosses from criminal activity to terrorism. IMHO that line is blurred to the point of undefinable and therefore the importance of not blurring the line between criminality and terrorism is an impossible aspiration. The line has already been blurred and dare I say it, that situation is being ruthlessly exploited.