Discussion in 'The NAAFI Bar' started by Carcass, Sep 25, 2008.
The heart of the site is the forum area, including:
Likely the guy would be welcomed at Catterick Garrison.
You're a knob, how is that the same, 4 sqauddies pick up a girl in a nightclub (you have to be 18 to get in ) and take her back and she turns out to be 15, oops but hardly rape is it.
Can't he join the Green Jackets?
This knob's quite obviously totally unhinged. Send him down for as long as possible and make him a paraplegic afterwards. Never let him anywhere near the Armed Forces.
The sex session happened in army base (heavily guarded) where presence of civilians is strongly prohibited.
Well we dont let our soldiers loose to systematically rape the local civpop unlike some other nations i can think of
...is strongly prohibited with some exceptions. Also manufacturing of porno films is not tolerated if soldiers are not actors.
...is strongly prohibited with some exceptions. Also manufacturing of porno films is not tolerated if soldiers are not actors.[/quote]
Bugger off and make your own thread for your non-story Sergey.
Utterly disgraceful. Have soldiers today got no standards?
Only two soldiers shagging her means there was one hole not in use. The end of the Cold War has obviously downgraded the importance of maintaining a tight seal.
And what happened to economy of effort?
Fair demand I should say. So I shut up.
However, even criminals sentenced to the death have right to the last word.
From my point of view moral levels of the soldiers (from my story) and the cadet (from your story) are the same.
Sergey, I completely disagree. In the case of the soldiers at Catterick, the proescution acknowledges that there was consent on the part of the female. In the case of the ex RAF cadet, there was none. An extremely important distinction.
That doesn't make what is alleged to have happened at Catterick acceptable, but you can't make any moral comparison with that case and a string of vicious sex attacks.
I do not have a problem with what the soldiers did at all, when you go drinking in an establishment where the minimum age requirement is 18 is it unreasonable to expect the girl your taking home is over 18.
Who here really ask for I.D in the heat of passion?
At the very worst they should get a slap on the wrist for smuggling the girl in, there's no way they should face the stigma of being put on the sex offenders register beside rapists and peados.
Separate names with a comma.