Security Accreditation Question?

Who should be Accrediting the Chistmas Box Information Infrastructure (XBII)

  • The Navy: they let everything through on an nod anyway, we will meet the ISD with time to spare

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Land: Just the right mix of security and pragmatism

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • PJHQ: Its deployable, so it must be their bag nearly as keen as RN to bear the risk

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strike: Deployment OK, but will require a 20-person audit team from 591 SU in 5* hotel accn for 3 w

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • DSSO: Accreditor is busy, but will definately turn up next week :oops:

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • DPA: Is responsible for delivery from "factory to foxhole" -- the logical choic

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Customer 1: Too busy arguing with Customer 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Customer 2: Too busy arguing with Customer 1

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • LIAG (V): Will accredit anything provided you can pay for the MTDs and sponsor their DV for another

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • GCHQ: Only they have the military staff approaching resettlement who really need an INFOSEC qual on

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
#1
This morning's ( pre tea and toast) big issue.

Remember folks every vote counts to selct the the last accreditor to leave the Big Brother " Christmas Box" keep area ( Type -B)
 
#2
subbsonic said:
This morning's ( pre tea and toast) big issue.

Remember folks every vote counts to selct the the last accreditor to leave the Big Brother " Christmas Box" keep area ( Type -B)
I think you're missing a poll question there, old chap. Clearly, the only entities capable of performing an appropriate commercial and security accreditation of such an exciting new PFI-financed initiative are commercial security consultancies, perhaps with the help and support of gigantic international technology companies.
 
#3
Let's go purple. Give it to Jack.
 
#5
Glad_its_all_over said:
Clearly, the only entities capable of performing an appropriate commercial and security accreditation of such an exciting new PFI-financed initiative are commercial security consultancies, perhaps with the help and support of gigantic international technology companies.
I think you will find that the final option covers this one off nicely old chap :wink:

our poll said said:
GCHQ: Only they have the military staff approaching resettlement who really need an INFOSEC qual on their CVs
25% [ 1 ]
I don;t think that larger companies would get a look in, (apart from one with a small subsidiary in a cotswold barn) However, I'm sure in the commercial INFOSEC space that there are a number of Small to Medium Enterprises close to the M4 / M5 confluence who sit well within CESG's comofort zone :roll:
 
#6
Sometime i have to sit back and think.."What the feck is he sayin.....?"
 
#7
AF1771 said:
Sometime i have to sit back and think.."What the feck is he sayin.....?"
If you're a bit lost perhaps you should ask a security specialist on the "dark side"

Wait 'til you start resettlement then, or will you be stepping directly into warm seat in one of Voldemort's* SPVs ??

* he who can not be named
 
#8
AF1771 said:
Sometime i have to sit back and think.."What the feck is he sayin.....?"
Ah, the force is strong in this one. Mind you, I do more lightside than darkside consultancy, so I guess I'm moving Skywalker-wards myself.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top