Section 69 of the Army Act 1955

I believe that this tried and trusted wording on the AF252 is now Section 19 of the Armed Forces Act 2006? Anyone confirm this? Also is the AF 252 still operational? Or has technology overtaken us here too?
 
I believe that this tried and trusted wording on the AF252 is now Section 19 of the Armed Forces Act 2006? Anyone confirm this? Also is the AF 252 still operational? Or has technology overtaken us here too?
Why do you want to know?
 
Section 19 - Conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline 1-7-59

From gov.uk - with just a smidgen of google-fu, look the rest up yourself, you lazy cunt
 

9.414

Old-Salt
252's went with the Armed Forces Act 2006 when things went tri-service.
s69 became s19, but with all the same issues.
 
Using Sect 69 or 19 is just plain lazy and shows a distinct lack of imagination.
 

AlienFTM

MIA
Book Reviewer
Using Sect 69 or 19 is just plain lazy and shows a distinct lack of imagination.
My last cavalry RSM, JC, RIP, the finest soldier I ever knew, took over. First Corporals' Mess meeting as President he instructed us that Section 69 was a cop-out. If his corporals couldn't find a better section, maybe they want to revert to trooper.
 

Latest Threads

Top