Secondary Weapon System - British Tactical Doctrine

Discussion in 'Infantry' started by Ancient_Hush_Puppy, Jan 12, 2013.

Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

The heart of the site is the forum area, including:

  1. Now that the MOD have settled on the Glock 17 is it planned for line infantry soldiers to be armed with pistols in addition to SA80A2's?

    A mate of mine is with the German Mountain Infantry and tells me that it has been their doctrine for many decades for each Gebirgjaeger to carry a sidearm in addition to his rifle. I believe that the US infantry may also follow this practice.
  2. What's an SA80A2?

    Sent by carrier pigeon using Speckled Jim
    • Like Like x 1
  3. If it isn't doctrine, it damned well ought to be, for all soldiers who may come into close-quarters with the enemy. If your main weapon stops firing and the enemy are really close, then drawing a side-arm is the fastest way to stay alive until you can fix the main problem. It wasn't Army doctrine in the 80's when I was in, but I never went out without one of my privately-bought pistols, as well as the main weapon (The Rifle of Note).

    Pity that can't happen now. Bastards. Hasn't made any difference to the crime figures, either, has it? Bastards.
  4. What if their pistol jams? Should they carry a third stubby pistol down their boots?
    • Like Like x 1
  5. You have a bayonet.
    • Like Like x 6
  6. Not everybody is heading off into dense jungle with likely resupply problems but it occurs to me your main weapon might have stopped firing because you carried a couple of pounds of gun rather than extra ammunition for the better bangy thing you can actually hit things with. Soldier's are loaded up with hardware these days, less might sometimes be more.
    • Like Like x 1
  7. [​IMG]
    • Like Like x 3
  8. I assume you mean the 1880s when young blades would privately purchase one of these

    Seriously, I didn't realize that it was permissible to carry privately purchased weapons on operations or exercises. Of course I'm making assumptions: I assume you refer to the British Military and that you weren't attached to some type of 'Them'?

    I remember a nasty bollocking (and IIRC kicking out) of a X para bloke who had a blank firing pistol on exercise in about 1983.
  9. Or, a Derringer, in your garter!.
  10. I think it would make for some interesting legal puzzles if you actually found yourself in a situation where you have to send some sod to the next world and used your own gat to do the deed.
    Surely there would be some argument that ROE and orders for opening fire are only valid using issued weapons.
    So what would be a legitimate enemy combatant fatality with an issued gat would be murder if committed with a privately owned one.
    Genuinely interested in what the legal standpoint is with that.

    Sent by carrier pigeon using Speckled Jim
    • Like Like x 2
  11. The same as if you cut his throat with a knife you'd bought yourself.
    • Like Like x 2
  12. Where were you allowed to do that?

    My guess is that it was either:

    a) Not British Army.

    b) Not true.
  13. Poke him in the eye with the rifle barrel?
  14. inherrent right to self defence? Regardless of weapon or who owns it. Otherwise we'd be prohibited picking up enemy gats.
    • Like Like x 2
  15. Most front line soldiers opt not to carry a pistol on Herrick tours.
    • Like Like x 1