Scranny Head

#1
Is this person a British version of IRONMAN? He just seems to make crap up!

I'm bored of fire fighting it, and I'm sure others are too . Can someone do something about him please? Better less content than crap content.
 
#2
stoatman said:
Is this person a British version of IRONMAN? He just seems to make crap up!

I'm bored of fire fighting it, and I'm sure others are too . Can someone do something about him please? Better less content than crap content.
Couldn't agree more, somebody please stop the tiresome little oik.
 
#3
The guy seems like a cock.

Why is he polluting the arsepdia with utter tosh? None of it Army relevant.

He should have crack coke injected into his forehead.
 
#6
ACHTUNG ACHTUNG ACHTUNG

He is back, with his posting rate undiminished.

Please deal with him! Do it for the kiddies, oh, won't somebody think of the children? they must be spared this kind of fiend!
 
#7
Gone for good this time
 
#8
Phew! I bet he was just chomping at the bit though for his previous one-month ban to expire before his fountains of drivel could spew forth once more and wreak havoc upon the plains of Arrsepedia :D
 
#9
Has he re-registered as Sniffle-Snaffle?

What about Rickshaw? Any chance of banning him too? (I think there's a good chance that Scranny, Rickshaw, and Sniffle-Snaffle may be the same person).
 
#10
Tartan_Terrier said:
Has he re-registered as Sniffle-Snaffle?

What about Rickshaw? Any chance of banning him too? (I think there's a good chance that Scranny, Rickshaw, and Sniffle-Snaffle may be the same person).
Not sure if he has re-registered, but Sniffle Snaffle has been blocked for the time being.

Am keeping a beady mark I on the others!

Ghostie
 
#11
Could someone please ban this cnut in perpetuity. Now posting under the user name 'Slim'.
 
#13
Cheers ears! I'll give it 48 hours (or less) before this annoying mong resurfaces under a different ID.
 
#14
Slim is, I believe, the new incarnation for this electronic moron. (Can't spell, either - he left the "e" off the end of his username.)

Cheers,
Cliff.
 
#15
Now posting as Gutaway on the RRPedia, he seems to be about the only one playing there, largely cutting and pasting the same drivel that he wrote on teh Arrsepedia.

Surely, at his age, he has something better to be doing, such as sticking the pages of Frankie Vaughan magazines together.
 
#16
got to admit that I am sick of him but while I can block him, I'm not sure I should. Think Ghostie or other mod needs to make the call even though the cnut is at this very moment removing the 'slims bone posts tags' from his shite and creating more shite.
 
#17
rabid_hamster said:
got to admit that I am sick of him but while I can block him, I'm not sure I should. Think Ghostie or other mod needs to make the call even though the cnut is at this very moment removing the 'slims bone posts tags' from his shite and creating more shite.
DO IT!!!!!

You know it makes sense...

Its getting a bit tedious now, as you're well aware. I cant kill dead ends quicker than he/she/it can create them.

Well that's my twopennerth that all can feel free to ignore if they wish.

JB
 
#18
If I did block him, I'd have to keep after him relentlessly. Each time a new ID popped up I'd probably delete everything he entered otherwise we've got the same shite under a different name. Then what if he retaliated and layed waste to the wiki?
Slim has over 1000 post the vast majority of them pointless edits - should they be killed off as well?
JB I am fully with you on the cnut but if we take action, would be happier if a CO or Ghostie was with us on whatever it was we did... Then again it is OUR wiki!
Can a MOD or a CO give us some help here?
 
#19
Unfortunately there is no 'undo everything this user has done' button which can sometimes be a pain. Control of trolls on wiki's also suffers from many of the similar issues that they do on here, i.e cannot block dynamic IPs, prevent re-registering, etc.

I've had a quick look through some of his stuff - is it really that bad? I know he has created some really short articles which is not ideal and the subject matter isn't necessarily to everyone's tastes. Maybe we should concentrate on making one of his pages really excellent using content, formatting, etc and then say to him ' that is how it should be done' - he's clearly keen so could we utilise that?
 
#20
BCO, this is his latest opus

http://www.arrse.co.uk/wiki/Kulspruta

it took him 4 attempts! I dont think he's interested in creating a excellent content pages.
He has been asked several times to improve his posts, his response was to copy part of Buck Felize's profile and insert it into about half a dozen other profiles. He then carried on as before with one line, cut and paste rubbish.
Also dont think keen is the word to describe him... Think stoaty has quite a few words to describe him though!
 

Similar threads


New Posts

Latest Threads

Top