There seems to be so much that went wrong in ths story - now this:
www.bbc.co.uk
We have a football agent who admits hiring a plane and pilot but says he didn't know the details of what he was paying for. (|Why would he? Don't we all buy goods and services without enquiring what we're getting?) We have a club who apparently arranged for a seat on a commercial scheduled flight, but probably the agent urged Sala to take the private flight instead because he thought he could add his margin to the cost. And we have an aircraft that even I know was not suitable for such a journey piloted by a man who wasn't qualified to undertake the flight.
All of that has come out subsequently but at the time of the accident one thing stuck me immediately; the plane was operating in Europe but registered in the USA. How it got here is a mystery because it certainly didn't fly the Atlantic - but hopefully someone more knowledgeable than I can tell me; was the plane subject to regular airworthiness inspections? I'm sure UK-registered planes in the UK are, just as UK-registered cars are subject to an MOT. And I'm pretty sure the USA has similar airworthiness requirements for US-registered planes over there. But being a US-registered plane located in Europe did this one slip through the net and not be registered for inspection by either? Because it certainly sounds as though it might have been short on maintainance...

Sala and plane pilot 'exposed to carbon monoxide'
The poisonous gas can cause "dizziness, unconsciousness and death," a report says.

We have a football agent who admits hiring a plane and pilot but says he didn't know the details of what he was paying for. (|Why would he? Don't we all buy goods and services without enquiring what we're getting?) We have a club who apparently arranged for a seat on a commercial scheduled flight, but probably the agent urged Sala to take the private flight instead because he thought he could add his margin to the cost. And we have an aircraft that even I know was not suitable for such a journey piloted by a man who wasn't qualified to undertake the flight.
All of that has come out subsequently but at the time of the accident one thing stuck me immediately; the plane was operating in Europe but registered in the USA. How it got here is a mystery because it certainly didn't fly the Atlantic - but hopefully someone more knowledgeable than I can tell me; was the plane subject to regular airworthiness inspections? I'm sure UK-registered planes in the UK are, just as UK-registered cars are subject to an MOT. And I'm pretty sure the USA has similar airworthiness requirements for US-registered planes over there. But being a US-registered plane located in Europe did this one slip through the net and not be registered for inspection by either? Because it certainly sounds as though it might have been short on maintainance...