Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Amazon
eBay
Navy Net
Menu
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Featured threads
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New reviews
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
Test
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
Book Reviews
Latest reviews
Search reviews
ARRSEPedia
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Help ARRSE
Amazon Referral
Ebay Referral
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Featured threads
Search forums
Forums
QM's - Military Equipment
Weapons, Equipment & Rations Discussion
SA80 Replacement on the distant horizon ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="incendiarycutlery, post: 10540653, member: 31359"] Yes, empty rifle in each case. 0.9kg for a loaded rifle or 0.2kg if you are comparing a bare L1A1 to a SUSAT’d L85. Fair point on the rail fore-end, so a latest issue L85 with optical sight might weigh nearly as much as an L1A1 without an optical sight which in my mind isn’t a fair comparison. Sure you could count all the bells and whistles that you can fit (and frequently are fitted) but if we’d kept the SLR we’d probably want said bells and whistles on that too. Since the base rifle is heavier the tricked-out version would also be heavier. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
QM's - Military Equipment
Weapons, Equipment & Rations Discussion
SA80 Replacement on the distant horizon ?
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
What's new
Log in
Register
Search
Top
