In your worked-up state you appear to have forgotten the
evidence, proof and absolute facts that I asked you to post yesterday.
Try again when you calm down a bit.
Well that's a stroke of luck for the believers-with-
no-proof-club, eh?
Not getting to see any of ukgov's 'evidence'
before it's shown in a UK court of law.
What what happen to this 'evidence' if there was never a court-case?
I wonder.........
Wow, you're so sharp I bet you cut yourself once in a while.
That's maybe because the article is something called
satire.
Maybe you've heard of the word?
ukgov and plod are certainly aware of the existence of this word.
Didn't you ever wonder why the uk's state broadcaster decided
not to run a skripal-piece on crimewatch over the last 7mths.
After all plod admitted to knowing nothing about anything a few times, didn't they?
This satirical piece demonstrates why there has been a minimum of asking-for-witnesses on tv with this case.
If the civpop in the UK were ever actually aware of the anomalies with this case a lot more answers would be demanded to a lot more questions.
As it is this whole mess has morphed a number of times already, off in different directions... It's very hard to keep track of what is supposed to now be gen and what is now deemed to be duff.
That's the point though.
Quite a few of us care, surprising you don't think it means much.
This whole thing has
always has been up there with a string-vest and Swiss cheese since day1/wk1 but you're still cheering for the team that has provided minimum evidence
The perfume bottle that broke or didn't break is another interesting sub-topic that has rx'd no real investigating.
I wonder where the nozzle was fitted into the internal packaging when the whole thing was packaged up?
View attachment 357969
One would have thought plod (or whoever's is currently running plod) would have taken time to show both sides of the Ricci box so everyone could be confident that everything being pushed was halal.
We only ever get this side of the box though.
View attachment 357970View attachment 357971
Back to the CCTV, where 99.999% is being kept from us.
Why the need for the heavy crop?
As it has now been confirmed that
all the cameras were all working there should be no shortage of evidence of what went on that Sunday.
Curious that the civpop being able to actually see the evidence all depends on there being a court-case sometime in the future.
So, one more time...for the benefit of those at the back..
Where is the evidence?
For your benefit, I'll keep this simple & I'll just cover the main points in order not to confuse you.
Your argument for months has been Russia innocent.
I'll start from the beginning. A former GRU agent, Sergei Skripal was living in Salisbury.
He along with his daughter, Yulia, were taken to hospital & both were found to have been poisoned by a Russian developed NA, Novichok. This has been proven beyond any doubt by the OPCW, an independent organisation. A rather exotic method of assassination, but so was the poisoning of Litvinenko.
At various times over the next few months, several other people in Salisbury were also affected by a Russian developed NA, Novichok, with one person dying.
A few months down the line, it turns out that on the same day that the initial poisonings occured, two GRU agents were in Salisbury.
Cctv evidence & their interview with the Russian state broadcaster RT, proves this beyond any doubt.
Despite their claim to be innocent tourists, it has been proven without any doubt that they are (or were) GRU operatives & that they had with them the aforementioned Russian developed NA, Novichok.
I've seen some coincidences in my life, but I'm having a problem believing that this is one.
Now, is there any of that you've got a problem with?
No doubt there will be.
You can argue with as much cut & paste as you want. You can also post in as much bold & different sized fonts as you want, but those are the facts.
Please don't rely on media "evidence", particularly pro Russian sources.
Be they western or pro Russian, they're selling that media. Or in the case of RT & others they are towing the Kremlin line.
Despite your demands to see all the evidence (cctv or otherwise), it has been pointed out to you & the other trolls numerous times that all the evidence will only be produced in court. In fact, you even quoted it in your latest rant.
You & I both know that a court case is unlikely for one of two reasons.
Either the two GRU agents are now dead. Or if not, they will certainly never be allowed out of Russia ever again.
However, should they appear in court, you can absolutely guarantee that the CPS (independent of government) case will be absolutely watertight.
Would it not be a good idea for the two GRU chaps, if they are innocent, to come to the UK & prove their innocence in a court in a democratic country that has an excellent human rights record? Putin should be keen on that too.
Also, remember Russian lies from the past?
KAL 007, MH 17, Crimea, The Kursk etc?
So you've got what you've got. The problem with conspiraloons like you, is that no amount of evidence will ever be good enough.
You've even claimed, bizarrely, at one stage that the whole thing has been a conspiracy between the UK & Russia.
Any more accusations of me deflecting?
FYI, I'm always calm. My friends say I'm the most laid back person they know.
You have tried to cover your arrse on the Crimewatch satire piece.
It's a shame you didn't realise it was satire when you couldn't help yourself jumping on it to post it in yet another attempt to claim "Russia innocent". I think this is too big for Crimewatch anyway.
The vast majority of "civpop" don't care about this. They're more concerned about what they're having for dinner or what they're doing at the weekend or their next holiday.
Not everyone is a conspiraloon.
No, I don't give a toss when a troll posts whataboutery & deflection (because that's what it is) about bottle tops.
I'll await your response in the normal cut & paste etc style.
Probably along the lines of "But where's the evidence", or perhaps "You call that evidence?" As I said, no amount of evidence will ever be good enough for a pro Russian conspiraloon troll like you.