Btw, I have realised that images of original Nina Ricci Premier Jour perfume were not posted (I could be mistaken).
Army Rumour Service
Register a free account today to join our community
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site, connect with other members through your own private inbox and will receive smaller adverts!
Russian 'intelligence' comedy of errors
- Thread starter S11Blade
- Start date
Slime
LE
Btw, I have realised that images of original Nina Ricci Premier Jour perfume were not posted (I could be mistaken).
But what about the lookalike bottle caps the Russian state manufactured for the athletic doping cheat scam that WADA punished them for?
Aren't you allowed to talk about the Russian state involvement in that???
You are a free private citizen after all
Wightsparker
LE
Pah. They were using good sturdy Zenit film cameras to avoid slush problems with digital machineses.
But misguided sanctions by western peoples cause temporary delay of developing chemicals for Bootsski film processing peoples.
Boshirov and Petrov have stopped singing "Kalinka" and now singing "Some day, my prints will come....."
Slime
LE
@184461
What did you think of the crimewatch link you posted?
I'm asking as you would have clearly read it before posting it to avoid it being silly and making you look an idiot!
What did you think of the fact that the link said the director gave up?
Was that a clever move, especially as crimewatch had been cancelled and stopped being made in 2017, yes, that's right, the year previous to the Skripal poisoning.
What did you think of the 'made up name' 'who dunnit'?
You will be aware that wasn't the directors real name but merely a play on words of the crime plays known as 'who dun it?'
To sum up, what purpose did it add to your argument to post a comedy article written for fun as pure fiction?
What did you think of the crimewatch link you posted?
I'm asking as you would have clearly read it before posting it to avoid it being silly and making you look an idiot!
What did you think of the fact that the link said the director gave up?
Was that a clever move, especially as crimewatch had been cancelled and stopped being made in 2017, yes, that's right, the year previous to the Skripal poisoning.
What did you think of the 'made up name' 'who dunnit'?
You will be aware that wasn't the directors real name but merely a play on words of the crime plays known as 'who dun it?'
To sum up, what purpose did it add to your argument to post a comedy article written for fun as pure fiction?
Drazyl
LE
They could always defend their reputation in a court of law, but that would require them to actually be innocent.
Slime
LE
They would also have to have a reputation!
To be honest this pair have nothing credible to show as they didn't have a business prior to making one up for RT
Slime
LE
KGB resident also has the problem that in the last ten days he has twice stated that just because many people believe something they may still be wrong.............
Then goes on to say he believes something despite having no actual evidence, but doesn't allow for himself to be wrong!
No it's not; it's an irrelevance.
Your unquestioning support for state ordered murder is important - be it ex spies or little kids on a bus with their mothers whose killing you rejoice in..
No it didn't.
If you want an example of fake belief, then look in the mirror.
You believe Crimea is historically Russian - WRONG
You believe Russia isn't responsible for shooting down MH17 - WRONG
You believe Russia isn't responsible for murdering Litvinenko - WRONG
You believe Russia isn't responsible for the Salisbury poisonings - WRONG
That or you know Russia is responsible but choose to support the murder of anyone, innocent or otherwise, so long as it makes Russia STRONK!!!
Of course the latter would make you an amoral piece of filth.
That's the Russian way, along with murder of course.
1) Yes, historically its Russian because Crimea as Russian were parts of the Golden Horde and Russia is an assignee of the Golden Horde.
2) 50/50. Russia could or could not be responsible.
3) Highly unlikely.
4) Highly unlikely.
Slime
LE
I pity you that you had to type the first point there, even you can't believe what you typed is correct.
No point addressing the other points.
Just for the sake of asking, are you still not allowed to talk about the Russian doping sample scam?
Grey Fox
*Russian Troll*
Should they prove their innocence, or the inability of HMG to prove their guilty (without stupud talks about "secret proves") will be enough? How much money they can demand in that case? Could they do it without a personal visit in UK, just by their lawyers?
