Russian 'intelligence' comedy of errors

KGB.... Shaken or Stirred..... so old fashioned, should now be evil personified NKVD or incompetent GRU.

Now, if I was in charge of this Mk 1 cluster F,,k outfit, that I use to work in.... I would make heads roll.
 
Last edited:
Ex-spy in a square in Berlin
Got holes in his knife-tipped shoes
He’ll tell you the missile codes man
He’ll sell you the warhead to​

 


Check out the Aggie band.
 
Last edited:
Liar. I, unlike you have never deflected
Yet another massive fail from the bullsh1t master himself?
Maybe 118118 wrote it.
Only in your disease ridden troll brain.
In your worked-up state you appear to have forgotten the evidence, proof and absolute facts that I asked you to post yesterday.

Try again when you calm down a bit.

SORRY FOR CAPS BUT YOU HAVE PERHAPS FORGOTTEN THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY SUGGESTED THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT NEEDED TO SHOW ITS EVIDENCE, YOU WERE REPEATEDLY CHALLENGED ON THIS, IT WAS POINTED OUT TO YOU HOW THE LAW WORKS AND THAT EVIDENCE ISNT SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC (not that you are British public) BEFORE A COURT CASE.
Well that's a stroke of luck for the believers-with-no-proof-club, eh?

Not getting to see any of ukgov's 'evidence' before it's shown in a UK court of law.

What what happen to this 'evidence' if there was never a court-case?
I wonder.........

That is just brilliant

Check out the name of the director, that's comedy genius and the rest of the piece is just as cleverly written :)

The name of the director is still making me chuckle now, I wonder if he is friends with Hugh Janus :)
Wow, you're so sharp I bet you cut yourself once in a while.

That's maybe because the article is something called satire.
Maybe you've heard of the word?
ukgov and plod are certainly aware of the existence of this word.


Didn't you ever wonder why the uk's state broadcaster decided not to run a skripal-piece on crimewatch over the last 7mths.
After all plod admitted to knowing nothing about anything a few times, didn't they?

This satirical piece demonstrates why there has been a minimum of asking-for-witnesses on tv with this case.
If the civpop in the UK were ever actually aware of the anomalies with this case a lot more answers would be demanded to a lot more questions.

As it is this whole mess has morphed a number of times already, off in different directions... It's very hard to keep track of what is supposed to now be gen and what is now deemed to be duff.

That's the point though.


Quite a few of us care, surprising you don't think it means much.
This whole thing has always has been up there with a string-vest and Swiss cheese since day1/wk1 but you're still cheering for the team that has provided minimum evidence

The perfume bottle that broke or didn't break is another interesting sub-topic that has rx'd no real investigating.


I wonder where the nozzle was fitted into the internal packaging when the whole thing was packaged up?

1539824125926.jpeg


One would have thought plod (or whoever's is currently running plod) would have taken time to show both sides of the Ricci box so everyone could be confident that everything being pushed was halal.

We only ever get this side of the box though.

1539824300031.jpeg
1539824314629.jpeg


Back to the CCTV, where 99.999% is being kept from us.

Why the need for the heavy crop?





As it has now been confirmed that all the cameras were all working there should be no shortage of evidence of what went on that Sunday.

Curious that the civpop being able to actually see the evidence all depends on there being a court-case sometime in the future.



So, one more time...for the benefit of those at the back..

Where is the evidence?
 
as per Putin talk,................ we wasn't there.
 
Poisoning of Napoleon is an allegation and this research is no more than an attempt to whitewhash potential poisoners.
As were many people at that time. The green colouring in wallpaper was arsenic based. So, more an act of omission rather than malice. That particular problem of lack of knowledge of the toxic effects of substances plagued Europe throughout the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

Not quite the same as spraying an organophosphate agent with malice and intent to kill.

Try again.

Edit to say, just seen scaliebacks post. The point still stands though
However, the British used CW on Russian soil during Russian civil war then they supported the White Rose.
The British used shells with poison against the Red army.
 
Fair enough. I apollogise for cnut.

I should obviously have used cnuts plural.
Sir, I'm very sorry. I would like to bring my sincere apologies because primitive expressions that I have used were insulting for great English language that is rich for means to express different shades of any sort of feelings in the most beautiful and understandable way.
You cun't imagine how your obedient servant is delighted by your kind post.
 
No. Unfortunately not.
You can download it for free as PDF here:

http://fan.lib.ru/img/e/eskov/last_ringbearer_engl/last_ring_bearer.pdf
In other formats here:

Еськов Кирилл - The Last Ringbearer, скачать бесплатно книгу в формате fb2, doc, rtf, html, txt

Tolkien wrote the Lord of the Rings in an attempt to create an English mythos . To give an example, he always thought of Sam Gamgee as the personification of the English squaddy. Loyal, indefatigable and so on. Anything to do with poisoning others was frankly a bit unBritish and to be avoided.

Sam would loosely describe anyone who poisoned others as twats, I think, whether an agent of Mordor or not.
Yes, I know about demonstrative British "toxicophobia", and Kirill do. In fact he is rather Anglophylic, and his "good" Mordor have many common elements with the Old UK - it is Constitutional Monarchy, it depend from the foods import, it have seriouse geographical barriers between them and their enemies, they were called as Worlds Smithy, and they (in the difference with West Coalition) didn't use poisoned weapon.
But I tend to think, that demonstrative British toxocophobia is just another element of traditional British hypocrisy.
For example, in the rather self-ironical (on the second or third layer of truth, but you never can be sure with the post-modernistic style) Septic TV-Show "Once upon a time", loyal Leitenant of a Royal Fleet Killian, became deserter, traitor and pirate Hook, because their ship was ordered to go at Neverland Island, to find and bring the super-poisonus plant, to win the war against a strong enemy. Crew, lead by the leitenant, refused to take part in the "war crime", and later we heard nothing about his Kingdom - highly likely it was pillaged and fully demolished, and its population was genocided.
And what would your choice in this situation - to find and deliver to your government a super-poison, that will kill millions (or even billions), or allow to enemy win the war, pillage, demolish and genocide your country?
 
You can download it for free as PDF here:

http://fan.lib.ru/img/e/eskov/last_ringbearer_engl/last_ring_bearer.pdf
In other formats here:

Еськов Кирилл - The Last Ringbearer, скачать бесплатно книгу в формате fb2, doc, rtf, html, txt

Yes, I know about demonstrative British "toxicophobia", and Kirill do. In fact he is rather Anglophylic, and his "good" Mordor have many common elements with the Old UK - it is Constitutional Monarchy, it depend from the foods import, it have seriouse geographical barriers between them and their enemies, they were called as Worlds Smithy, and they (in the difference with West Coalition) didn't use poisoned weapon.
But I tend to think, that demonstrative British toxocophobia is just another element of traditional British hypocrisy.
For example, in the rather self-ironical (on the second or third layer of truth, but you never can be sure with the post-modernistic style) Septic TV-Show "Once upon a time", loyal Leitenant of a Royal Fleet Killian, became deserter, traitor and pirate Hook, because their ship was ordered to go at Neverland Island, to find and bring the super-poisonus plant, to win the war against a strong enemy. Crew, lead by the leitenant, refused to take part in the "war crime", and later we heard nothing about his Kingdom - highly likely it was pillaged and fully demolished, and its population was genocided.
And what would your choice in this situation - to find and deliver to your government a super-poison, that will kill millions (or even billions), or allow to enemy win the war, pillage, demolish and genocide your country?
Your specialist subject is fiction (and rape, let's not forget you're a rapist....)
 
You can download it for free as PDF here:

http://fan.lib.ru/img/e/eskov/last_ringbearer_engl/last_ring_bearer.pdf
In other formats here:

Еськов Кирилл - The Last Ringbearer, скачать бесплатно книгу в формате fb2, doc, rtf, html, txt

Yes, I know about demonstrative British "toxicophobia", and Kirill do. In fact he is rather Anglophylic, and his "good" Mordor have many common elements with the Old UK - it is Constitutional Monarchy, it depend from the foods import, it have seriouse geographical barriers between them and their enemies, they were called as Worlds Smithy, and they (in the difference with West Coalition) didn't use poisoned weapon.
But I tend to think, that demonstrative British toxocophobia is just another element of traditional British hypocrisy.
For example, in the rather self-ironical (on the second or third layer of truth, but you never can be sure with the post-modernistic style) Septic TV-Show "Once upon a time", loyal Leitenant of a Royal Fleet Killian, became deserter, traitor and pirate Hook, because their ship was ordered to go at Neverland Island, to find and bring the super-poisonus plant, to win the war against a strong enemy. Crew, lead by the leitenant, refused to take part in the "war crime", and later we heard nothing about his Kingdom - highly likely it was pillaged and fully demolished, and its population was genocided.
And what would your choice in this situation - to find and deliver to your government a super-poison, that will kill millions (or even billions), or allow to enemy win the war, pillage, demolish and genocide your country?
Nope that's just words....well I say words but some of them are just letters arranged like words but not actually making up a word and that after applying the default Russian accent.
Is the original one who could string a sentence together not (ahem) available?
You lot still get sent to Siberia, coz when your masters learn you lied about your level of 'eniglish' well....I'd be trying to win that jacket competition.
 
In your worked-up state you appear to have forgotten the evidence, proof and absolute facts that I asked you to post yesterday.

Try again when you calm down a bit.



Well that's a stroke of luck for the believers-with-no-proof-club, eh?

Not getting to see any of ukgov's 'evidence' before it's shown in a UK court of law.

What what happen to this 'evidence' if there was never a court-case?
I wonder.........



Wow, you're so sharp I bet you cut yourself once in a while.

That's maybe because the article is something called satire.
Maybe you've heard of the word?
ukgov and plod are certainly aware of the existence of this word.


Didn't you ever wonder why the uk's state broadcaster decided not to run a skripal-piece on crimewatch over the last 7mths.
After all plod admitted to knowing nothing about anything a few times, didn't they?

This satirical piece demonstrates why there has been a minimum of asking-for-witnesses on tv with this case.
If the civpop in the UK were ever actually aware of the anomalies with this case a lot more answers would be demanded to a lot more questions.

As it is this whole mess has morphed a number of times already, off in different directions... It's very hard to keep track of what is supposed to now be gen and what is now deemed to be duff.

That's the point though.




Quite a few of us care, surprising you don't think it means much.
This whole thing has always has been up there with a string-vest and Swiss cheese since day1/wk1 but you're still cheering for the team that has provided minimum evidence

The perfume bottle that broke or didn't break is another interesting sub-topic that has rx'd no real investigating.


I wonder where the nozzle was fitted into the internal packaging when the whole thing was packaged up?

View attachment 357969

One would have thought plod (or whoever's is currently running plod) would have taken time to show both sides of the Ricci box so everyone could be confident that everything being pushed was halal.

We only ever get this side of the box though.

View attachment 357970 View attachment 357971

Back to the CCTV, where 99.999% is being kept from us.

Why the need for the heavy crop?





As it has now been confirmed that all the cameras were all working there should be no shortage of evidence of what went on that Sunday.

Curious that the civpop being able to actually see the evidence all depends on there being a court-case sometime in the future.



So, one more time...for the benefit of those at the back..

Where is the evidence?
The evidence has been presented umpteen times but you being a nassty little Putinbot troll means you'll never accept it.
Now piss off back to your state supplied hovel & drink some antifreeze, lots of it.
 
Your specialist subject is fiction (and rape, let's not forget you're a rapist....)
Nope that's just words....well I say words but some of them are just letters arranged like words but not actually making up a word and that after applying the default Russian accent.
Is the original one who could string a sentence together not (ahem) available?
You lot still get sent to Siberia, coz when your masters learn you lied about your level of 'eniglish' well....I'd be trying to win that jacket competition.
@blurp , are those chattering animals typical species of the British anti-intellectuals?
 
Poisoning of Napoleon is an allegation and this research is no more than an attempt to whitewhash potential poisoners.
Sometimes you don’t even bother to hide your stupidity
However, the British used CW on Russian soil during Russian civil war then they supported the White Rose.
The British used shells with poison against the Red army.
Pretty much everyone inc. Russia used gas during WW1. After Russia surrendered we did support the White Russians and used CW. As Russia did against her own people in 1921 during the Tambov Rebellion.

Still, as we’re in the second half of the second decade of the 21st Century and Russia is a signatory to the CWC, it’s use is prohibited.
 
@blurp , are those chattering animals typical species of the British anti-intellectuals?
We all hope you’re just the extreme end of Russian nationalism and of a blinkered view. I’d hate to think all Russians were like you.
 
In your worked-up state you appear to have forgotten the evidence, proof and absolute facts that I asked you to post yesterday.

Try again when you calm down a bit.



Well that's a stroke of luck for the believers-with-no-proof-club, eh?

Not getting to see any of ukgov's 'evidence' before it's shown in a UK court of law.

What what happen to this 'evidence' if there was never a court-case?
I wonder.........



Wow, you're so sharp I bet you cut yourself once in a while.

That's maybe because the article is something called satire.
Maybe you've heard of the word?
ukgov and plod are certainly aware of the existence of this word.


Didn't you ever wonder why the uk's state broadcaster decided not to run a skripal-piece on crimewatch over the last 7mths.
After all plod admitted to knowing nothing about anything a few times, didn't they?

This satirical piece demonstrates why there has been a minimum of asking-for-witnesses on tv with this case.
If the civpop in the UK were ever actually aware of the anomalies with this case a lot more answers would be demanded to a lot more questions.

As it is this whole mess has morphed a number of times already, off in different directions... It's very hard to keep track of what is supposed to now be gen and what is now deemed to be duff.

That's the point though.




Quite a few of us care, surprising you don't think it means much.
This whole thing has always has been up there with a string-vest and Swiss cheese since day1/wk1 but you're still cheering for the team that has provided minimum evidence

The perfume bottle that broke or didn't break is another interesting sub-topic that has rx'd no real investigating.


I wonder where the nozzle was fitted into the internal packaging when the whole thing was packaged up?

View attachment 357969

One would have thought plod (or whoever's is currently running plod) would have taken time to show both sides of the Ricci box so everyone could be confident that everything being pushed was halal.

We only ever get this side of the box though.

View attachment 357970 View attachment 357971

Back to the CCTV, where 99.999% is being kept from us.

Why the need for the heavy crop?





As it has now been confirmed that all the cameras were all working there should be no shortage of evidence of what went on that Sunday.

Curious that the civpop being able to actually see the evidence all depends on there being a court-case sometime in the future.



So, one more time...for the benefit of those at the back..

Where is the evidence?
Funnily enough, you have already posted multiple times that you know who has the evidence, and you have already posted multiple times that they haven't shown it to you. It's a bit stupid to keep asking for answers you already have.

Going back to the burden of proof you mention in this post, you were asked to show proof that the British government needed to show the evidence they have, you COULDNT do that.

Ergo, the U.K. Police have the evidence, they can't show it to you as there is no trial yet.
If you do actually want to see all the evidence in complete detail you should be urging the pair of suspects to to return to the UK for a fair trial.
 
Poisoning of Napoleon is an allegation and this research is no more than an attempt to whitewhash potential poisoners.

However, the British used CW on Russian soil during Russian civil war then they supported the White Rose.
The British used shells with poison against the Red army.
For clarity, when you mention the legal use of chemical weapons during the Russian civil war, now that the use of chemical weapons is now illegal under treaties that Russia is a signatory to, are you saying the use of chemical weapons is an act of war?
 
Where is the evidence?
The British authorities have evidence of Russian guilt.Lots of evidence.
However due to the British legal system, none can be disclosed at this stage as it may prejudice any future legal proceedings.This is I assume unfamiliar territory to someone used to the Russian system of "justice"
So send "Boshirov/Petrov/Chepiga" over here and all the evidence will be disclosed at their trial.
 
In your worked-up state you appear to have forgotten the evidence, proof and absolute facts that I asked you to post yesterday.

Try again when you calm down a bit.



Well that's a stroke of luck for the believers-with-no-proof-club, eh?

Not getting to see any of ukgov's 'evidence' before it's shown in a UK court of law.

What what happen to this 'evidence' if there was never a court-case?
I wonder.........



Wow, you're so sharp I bet you cut yourself once in a while.

That's maybe because the article is something called satire.
Maybe you've heard of the word?
ukgov and plod are certainly aware of the existence of this word.


Didn't you ever wonder why the uk's state broadcaster decided not to run a skripal-piece on crimewatch over the last 7mths.
After all plod admitted to knowing nothing about anything a few times, didn't they?

This satirical piece demonstrates why there has been a minimum of asking-for-witnesses on tv with this case.
If the civpop in the UK were ever actually aware of the anomalies with this case a lot more answers would be demanded to a lot more questions.

As it is this whole mess has morphed a number of times already, off in different directions... It's very hard to keep track of what is supposed to now be gen and what is now deemed to be duff.

That's the point though.




Quite a few of us care, surprising you don't think it means much.
This whole thing has always has been up there with a string-vest and Swiss cheese since day1/wk1 but you're still cheering for the team that has provided minimum evidence

The perfume bottle that broke or didn't break is another interesting sub-topic that has rx'd no real investigating.


I wonder where the nozzle was fitted into the internal packaging when the whole thing was packaged up?

View attachment 357969

One would have thought plod (or whoever's is currently running plod) would have taken time to show both sides of the Ricci box so everyone could be confident that everything being pushed was halal.

We only ever get this side of the box though.

View attachment 357970 View attachment 357971

Back to the CCTV, where 99.999% is being kept from us.

Why the need for the heavy crop?





As it has now been confirmed that all the cameras were all working there should be no shortage of evidence of what went on that Sunday.

Curious that the civpop being able to actually see the evidence all depends on there being a court-case sometime in the future.



So, one more time...for the benefit of those at the back..

Where is the evidence?
For your benefit, I'll keep this simple & I'll just cover the main points in order not to confuse you.
Your argument for months has been Russia innocent.
I'll start from the beginning. A former GRU agent, Sergei Skripal was living in Salisbury.
He along with his daughter, Yulia, were taken to hospital & both were found to have been poisoned by a Russian developed NA, Novichok. This has been proven beyond any doubt by the OPCW, an independent organisation. A rather exotic method of assassination, but so was the poisoning of Litvinenko.
At various times over the next few months, several other people in Salisbury were also affected by a Russian developed NA, Novichok, with one person dying.
A few months down the line, it turns out that on the same day that the initial poisonings occured, two GRU agents were in Salisbury.
Cctv evidence & their interview with the Russian state broadcaster RT, proves this beyond any doubt.
Despite their claim to be innocent tourists, it has been proven without any doubt that they are (or were) GRU operatives & that they had with them the aforementioned Russian developed NA, Novichok.
I've seen some coincidences in my life, but I'm having a problem believing that this is one.
Now, is there any of that you've got a problem with?
No doubt there will be.

You can argue with as much cut & paste as you want. You can also post in as much bold & different sized fonts as you want, but those are the facts.
Please don't rely on media "evidence", particularly pro Russian sources.
Be they western or pro Russian, they're selling that media. Or in the case of RT & others they are towing the Kremlin line.

Despite your demands to see all the evidence (cctv or otherwise), it has been pointed out to you & the other trolls numerous times that all the evidence will only be produced in court. In fact, you even quoted it in your latest rant.
You & I both know that a court case is unlikely for one of two reasons.
Either the two GRU agents are now dead. Or if not, they will certainly never be allowed out of Russia ever again.
However, should they appear in court, you can absolutely guarantee that the CPS (independent of government) case will be absolutely watertight.
Would it not be a good idea for the two GRU chaps, if they are innocent, to come to the UK & prove their innocence in a court in a democratic country that has an excellent human rights record? Putin should be keen on that too.

Also, remember Russian lies from the past?
KAL 007, MH 17, Crimea, The Kursk etc?

So you've got what you've got. The problem with conspiraloons like you, is that no amount of evidence will ever be good enough.
You've even claimed, bizarrely, at one stage that the whole thing has been a conspiracy between the UK & Russia.

Any more accusations of me deflecting?
FYI, I'm always calm. My friends say I'm the most laid back person they know.

You have tried to cover your arrse on the Crimewatch satire piece.
It's a shame you didn't realise it was satire when you couldn't help yourself jumping on it to post it in yet another attempt to claim "Russia innocent". I think this is too big for Crimewatch anyway.

The vast majority of "civpop" don't care about this. They're more concerned about what they're having for dinner or what they're doing at the weekend or their next holiday.
Not everyone is a conspiraloon.

No, I don't give a toss when a troll posts whataboutery & deflection (because that's what it is) about bottle tops.

I'll await your response in the normal cut & paste etc style.

Probably along the lines of "But where's the evidence", or perhaps "You call that evidence?" As I said, no amount of evidence will ever be good enough for a pro Russian conspiraloon troll like you.
 

chrisg46

LE
Book Reviewer
In your worked-up state you appear to have forgotten the evidence, proof and absolute facts that I asked you to post yesterday.

Try again when you calm down a bit.

How many times have you blanked a question put to you? There is no point discussing this with you, as you ignore anything that does not match your view.


Well that's a stroke of luck for the believers-with-no-proof-club, eh?

Not getting to see any of ukgov's 'evidence' before it's shown in a UK court of law.

No, thats the law. Thats how it works. Again, this has been explained MANY MANY MANY times to you. Please provide an example of a court case where the evidence was released to all before hand?


What what happen to this 'evidence' if there was never a court-case?
I wonder.........

30 year rule might apply, maybe longer. It is very unlikely there will be a court case so maybe when all those potentially involved are dead, evidence could be released.


Wow, you're so sharp I bet you cut yourself once in a while.

That's maybe because the article is something called satire.
Maybe you've heard of the word?
ukgov and plod are certainly aware of the existence of this word.


Didn't you ever wonder why the uk's state broadcaster decided not to run a skripal-piece on crimewatch over the last 7mths.
After all plod admitted to knowing nothing about anything a few times, didn't they?

Crimewatch that ended in 2017?


The perfume bottle that broke or didn't break is another interesting sub-topic that has rx'd no real investigating.


I wonder where the nozzle was fitted into the internal packaging when the whole thing was packaged up?

One would have thought plod (or whoever's is currently running plod) would have taken time to show both sides of the Ricci box so everyone could be confident that everything being pushed was halal.

We only ever get this side of the box though.

Evidence perhaps? See above.

Back to the CCTV, where 99.999% is being kept from us.

Why the need for the heavy crop?

Go on then whats your theory? Are you suggesting that there is case-destroying evidence just out of shot?




As it has now been confirmed that all the cameras were all working there should be no shortage of evidence of what went on that Sunday.

Curious that the civpop being able to actually see the evidence all depends on there being a court-case sometime in the future.

Yet again, no it isnt. Its a court of law, not a court of public opinion


So, one more time...for the benefit of those at the back..

Where is the evidence?
One more time... for the benefit of the trolls

IT WILL BE RELEASED IN COURT, IT WILL NOT BE SHOWN BEFOREHAND.
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top