Russian 'intelligence' comedy of errors

The Whole World at time supported the version that the Earth is flat. Number of people that support this or that version can not be used as a proof.
No it didn't.
If you want an example of fake belief, then look in the mirror.

You believe Crimea is historically Russian - WRONG
You believe Russia isn't responsible for shooting down MH17 - WRONG
You believe Russia isn't responsible for murdering Litvinenko - WRONG
You believe Russia isn't responsible for the Salisbury poisonings - WRONG

That or you know Russia is responsible but choose to support the murder of anyone, innocent or otherwise, so long as it makes Russia STRONK!!!

Of course the latter would make you an amoral piece of filth.
 
Putin is recruiting, NKVD 1 (For the old lags) and GRU 1 (For the young ones) names are available on a first come basis.
 
No it didn't.
If you want an example of fake belief, then look in the mirror.

1) You believe Crimea is historically Russian - WRONG
2) You believe Russia isn't responsible for shooting down MH17 - WRONG
3) You believe Russia isn't responsible for murdering Litvinenko - WRONG
4) You believe Russia isn't responsible for the Salisbury poisonings - WRONG

That or you know Russia is responsible but choose to support the murder of anyone, innocent or otherwise, so long as it makes Russia STRONK!!!

Of course the latter would make you an amoral piece of filth.
1) Yes, historically its Russian because Crimea as Russian were parts of the Golden Horde and Russia is an assignee of the Golden Horde.
2) 50/50. Russia could or could not be responsible.
3) Highly unlikely.
4) Highly unlikely.
 
1) Yes, historically its Russian because Crimea as Russian were parts of the Golden Horde and Russia is an assignee of the Golden Horde.
2) 50/50. Russia could or could not be responsible.
3) Highly unlikely.
4) Highly unlikely.
I pity you that you had to type the first point there, even you can't believe what you typed is correct.

No point addressing the other points.

Just for the sake of asking, are you still not allowed to talk about the Russian doping sample scam?
 
They could always defend their reputation in a court of law, but that would require them to actually be innocent.
Should they prove their innocence, or the inability of HMG to prove their guilty (without stupud talks about "secret proves") will be enough? How much money they can demand in that case? Could they do it without a personal visit in UK, just by their lawyers?
 
Why not? Most stupid, greedy and immoral of Russian whores, traitors, crooks and thieves are usually going to UK. Birds of a feather - flock together, don't they?
So long as you and the remaining rapists stay there you mean?
 
1) Yes, historically its Russian because Crimea as Russian were parts of the Golden Horde and Russia is an assignee of the Golden Horde.
Ah, a historical claim, so you'll be handing back Königsberg .......when? Or is RUSSIA SPECIAL? Krim was area occupied by the Ancient Greeks, why does Russia's claim trump Greece's?

You've been asked these questions before but it seems your supervisor wouldn't let you go off message......if you're 'a free man' you can answer, if not.....

So when DID Russia control Krim? (Clue not before 1783), by your logic Britain can claim the Eastern US..... Before then Krim it was Turkish......what invalidates their claim? Again failure to answer just shows your inability to go 'off script'
 
Last edited:
Do you really think, that they flew in UK because of the post-rape psyhological problems? Group therapy in the raped country, and all of this?
Is that what you did in Chechnya? Revisit the scene of your crime?
 
1) Yes, historically its Russian because Crimea as Russian were parts of the Golden Horde and Russia is an assignee of the Golden Horde.
2) 50/50. Russia could or could not be responsible.
3) Highly unlikely.
4) Highly unlikely.
Id call you an utter cnut, but which one would get the message?
Be a dear and pass it on to the others.
 
So when DID Russia control Krim? (Clue not before 1783), '
Russian Duchy of Tmutarakan' was exist in the East Crimea in X-XII centuries. First historically written Russian invaders, lead by Conung Helgi came there in the start of X century and were fighting with armies of Khazar's Kaganate (lead by Pesakh).
In 988 Prince Vladimir had captured Khersones of Tavrica and married Byzantian Princess Anna. That is one of reasons why Russia is a heir of Byzantia, that was the heir of Antient Greeks and Antient Romans (who were, accordind their official political mythology, heirs of Throya).
But before Greeks and Khazars, Crymea was settled by Skithians who, later became Alanians, and later - Ossetians. And now absolute mayority of Ossetians are Russians.
So, if you want to find somebody, who have more antient 'rights' on the Crymea, you should search heirs of Kimmerians.
 

Similar threads

New Posts

Latest Threads

Top