Russian 'intelligence' comedy of errors

User 184461 is a unpaid Russian Troll, treat accordingly.

Guns



Maybe at a later date.
Right now I'd settle for some of the 5k+ hours of publicly-paid-for CCTV that plod has admitted to having since the FOIA, concerning Salisbury's CCTV system being up and running, was answered.
Particularly between midday and 17h00 on 04/03/18.

You would have thought the plod would have been asking for any/all local footage from the public via a
tv/media campaign.
Gov/plod appeared not to have the first scooby almost 2mths after the event even though they've been solely blaming the Ru state since day1.



The complete lack of advertising for witnesses/cctv at the time, the complete lack of a SR on any particular suspected players.
They could have done a good 'crimewatch', although....

BBC Crimewatch Reconstruction of Salisbury Poisonings Shelved After Director Gives up and Considers New Career



Just something to add some substance to the rumour-control you're all obsessing over.


None of us know anything.
Things have been purposefully made complicated as is often the case.
Only a few know up from down and they aren't going to on this site spilling their guts.

It should be a foregone conclusion that SS in his MI6 safe house/ cul de sac home should have had a small CCTV system at very least but we've never had it confirmed.


You mean confirmed or denied for the NA that can-be-made and has-been-made all over the planet for the last 20yrs?
That's probably because he's still laughing at the uk.


Put your money where your gaping-wide gob is.

Put up a list of all evidence, as far as you're still concerned.
I asked you ages ago but you deflected away on to The Powerpuff Girls and unicorns.
Liar. I, unlike you have never deflected. Reams of evidence has been presented but YOU have deflected time & time again. Apart from that, the comment wasn't aimed at you, it was aimed at one of the other trolls. Although it may as well have been.
You're clearly confused & again, your getting angry. What was it that upset your delicate little troll self? Russia guilty as sin?
Why is it so important to you that Russia is always innocent?
YOU answer the question then. What else were two GRU agents doing in Salisbury at the same time as a former GRU agents was poisoned? Two "innocent businessmen" wanting to look at the cathedral & couldn't find it when it's visible from miles around.
The whole world knows what they really are. Or do you want to deny that as well?
The best we've had from you previously is along the lines of "how should I know".
So put up or shut up.
All we ever get from you is denial & the same tired, worn out, already answered questions. Try thinking for yourself. Although being a troll, that's not permitted is it?
Despite yours & others protestations to the contrary, there is enough evidence, yes evidence, that the CPS believe there is enough that they appear in court.
 
Anyway, I need to have a reference to the salting of our field and the lamentations of our women as I am subsumed with paperwork at the minute in my Hobbit hole. It would cheer me up. Incidentally, the door of my two brick thick house is made of a BTR wheel so , in part you are right.
Did you read Kirill Eskov's book "The last Ringbearer"? For one, it is one of the best fiction books about the Russian understanding of spycraft, translated in English, and what is may be more important - based on the English fiction world.
http://fan.lib.ru/img/e/eskov/last_ringbearer_engl/last_ring_bearer.pdf
As antiofftop - main positive hero in this book is The Mordorian poison expert.
 
Last edited:
Guilt is not proven in advance of interviewing suspects
That’s the point of interviewing suspects

They can be arrested, interviewed and released with all and any charges dropped
They also can be interviewed not being arrested. The Met could make a request the interviews.
 
They also can be interviewed not being arrested. The Met could make a request the interviews.
We’ve seen what happens in those cases. Lots of prevarication, spooks in the bar, funny substances in drinks and the suspects get elected to the Duma.

If your ‘slush averse goons’ protest their innocence, the best way is for them to surrender to British custody.
 
You don't find it strange that the whole world supports the UK version of events in Salisbury and not a single nation has come out to support Russia? Proper perspective is often difficult for self-confessed rapists such as yourself though.
The Whole World at time supported the version that the Earth is flat. Number of people that support this or that version can not be used as a proof.
 
We’ve seen what happens in those cases. Lots of prevarication, spooks in the bar, funny substances in drinks and the suspects get elected to the Duma.

If your ‘slush averse goons’ protest their innocence, the best way is for them to surrender to British custody.
It is the best way for British authorities - to blackmail, to manipulate, to threaten. For the pair it is the worst way.
 
Last edited:
It is the sest way for British authorities - to blackmail, to manipulate, to threaten. For the pair it is the worst way.
Once again, you shouldn't judge your 'crooks and thieves' with the UK.

Your straw clutching and inability to face facts speaks volumes. You are a busted flush
 
In such a serious case any detail is important. The nozzle is a superimportant detail.
True, and as already stated, you could learn NOTHING from looking at a photo of it.

Again, and as you want to talk about a country already proven to have made lookalike bottle tops in a state sponsored cheating scandal what is your point about this latest state operation?
 
User 184461 is a unpaid Russian Troll, treat accordingly.

Guns



Maybe at a later date.
Right now I'd settle for some of the 5k+ hours of publicly-paid-for CCTV that plod has admitted to having since the FOIA, concerning Salisbury's CCTV system being up and running, was answered.
Particularly between midday and 17h00 on 04/03/18.

You would have thought the plod would have been asking for any/all local footage from the public via a
tv/media campaign.
Gov/plod appeared not to have the first scooby almost 2mths after the event even though they've been solely blaming the Ru state since day1.



The complete lack of advertising for witnesses/cctv at the time, the complete lack of a SR on any particular suspected players.
They could have done a good 'crimewatch', although....

BBC Crimewatch Reconstruction of Salisbury Poisonings Shelved After Director Gives up and Considers New Career



Just something to add some substance to the rumour-control you're all obsessing over.


None of us know anything.
Things have been purposefully made complicated as is often the case.
Only a few know up from down and they aren't going to on this site spilling their guts.

It should be a foregone conclusion that SS in his MI6 safe house/ cul de sac home should have had a small CCTV system at very least but we've never had it confirmed.


You mean confirmed or denied for the NA that can-be-made and has-been-made all over the planet for the last 20yrs?
That's probably because he's still laughing at the uk.


Put your money where your gaping-wide gob is.

Put up a list of all evidence, as far as you're still concerned.
I asked you ages ago but you deflected away on to The Powerpuff Girls and unicorns.

Thanks for quoting my question :)

I asked if you wanted to see CCTV of the pair of GRU OPERATIVES, and you said maybe later, so it's good we are at least making progress and you didn't dispute they were GRU OPERATIVES.

But then you spoiled it all by saying you would like to see some of the public funded footage.

SORRY FOR CAPS BUT YOU HAVE PERHAPS FORGOTTEN THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY SUGGESTED THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT NEEDED TO SHOW ITS EVIDENCE, YOU WERE REPEATEDLY CHALLENGED ON THIS, IT WAS POINTED OUT TO YOU HOW THE LAW WORKS AND THAT EVIDENCE ISNT SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC (not that you are British public) BEFORE A COURT CASE.
YOU THEN KEPT REPEATING YOUR CLAIM SO I CHALLENGED YOU TO SHOW WHEN ENGLISH LAW HAD CHANGED TO ALLOW EVIDENCE TO BE SHOWN BEFORE A COURT CASE.
YOU THEN STOPPED POSTING ON ARRSE FOR TWO DAYS, THEN WHEN YOU RETURNED YOU COULD NOT PROVIDE ANY LINK OR REFERENCE TO WHEN THE LAW HAD CHANGED.
THE LAW HADNT CHANGED, YOU KNOW THIS, I KNOW THIS, WE ALL KNOW THIS.

STOP ACTING LIKE A PATHETIC CHILD.
 
Substance?
You do realise what that crimewatch article is ?
That is just brilliant

Check out the name of the director, that's comedy genius and the rest of the piece is just as cleverly written :)

The name of the director is still making me chuckle now, I wonder if he is friends with Hugh Janus :)
 
Last edited:
Btw, I have realised that images of original Nina Ricci Premier Jour perfume were not posted (I could be mistaken).



 
Btw, I have realised that images of original Nina Ricci Premier Jour perfume were not posted (I could be mistaken).



But what about the lookalike bottle caps the Russian state manufactured for the athletic doping cheat scam that WADA punished them for?

Aren't you allowed to talk about the Russian state involvement in that???

You are a free private citizen after all :)
 
So where are the images of the cathedral that Boshirov and Petrov claim that they took? They promised the editor of RT during the interview that they would supply her with said images?
Pah. They were using good sturdy Zenit film cameras to avoid slush problems with digital machineses.

But misguided sanctions by western peoples cause temporary delay of developing chemicals for Bootsski film processing peoples.

Boshirov and Petrov have stopped singing "Kalinka" and now singing "Some day, my prints will come....."
 
@184461
What did you think of the crimewatch link you posted?

I'm asking as you would have clearly read it before posting it to avoid it being silly and making you look an idiot!

What did you think of the fact that the link said the director gave up?
Was that a clever move, especially as crimewatch had been cancelled and stopped being made in 2017, yes, that's right, the year previous to the Skripal poisoning.

What did you think of the 'made up name' 'who dunnit'?
You will be aware that wasn't the directors real name but merely a play on words of the crime plays known as 'who dun it?'

To sum up, what purpose did it add to your argument to post a comedy article written for fun as pure fiction?
 

Similar threads

Top