Russian 'intelligence' comedy of errors

If they had a choice to walk somewhere and then drink, or start to drink without walking - slash can be a reason.
Slash is a colloquialism for urinating. Which is what they appear to be doing out of fear of slush
Why not? Their week-end, their money. They can do what they want.
Nice pictures of the 123M spire on their social media accounts?
Your CPS are Brits, too. No doubts, that they believe in all that codswallop about agents of GRU, super-secret poison 'Durachok' and so on...
As before, you shouldn’t judge the U.K. by the actions of the corrupt specimens in your govt and law enforcement.
 
And guilty of Boshirov and Petrov was not proven.


If British government really have evidence of anybodies guilty in the crime against Russian citizens - they can make it public, or send to Russia. Hiding evidence - means covering of real criminals. From another hand hiding of evidence means violation of the commercial right of Britis citizens, who lost their health, money or relatives.
Guilt is not proven in advance of interviewing suspects
That’s the point of interviewing suspects

They can be arrested, interviewed and released with all and any charges dropped
Or the case can move to trial, for the evidence and the prosecutions case to be tried in court

There is a case with sufficient evidence to have been presented for warrants to be raised
That’s how justice works
 
If they had a choice to walk somewhere and then drink, or start to drink without walking - slash can be a reason.


Why not? Their week-end, their money. They can do what they want.


Your CPS are Brits, too. No doubts, that they believe in all that codswallop about agents of GRU, super-secret poison 'Durachok' and so on...
Their weekend, their money
They can spend their time how they like - it that’s taking the tourist trail along an A road looking at petrol stations then fair enough.

But their hobby has caught them in the middle of a murder case. I’d be getting my photos out sharpish
 
May be, thay have other problems exept sending photos to RT. Anyway, it proves nothing, and what is more important - they dont need to prove their innocence.
By the way, can they file civil suit in British court against HMG, about violation of their business reputation, without personal visiting of UK?
They have a few problems, such as the whole world thinking they are murderers
They don’t have to prove their innocence, the prosecution has to prove guilt
But mud sticks. The entire world thinks they are killers, they cannot leave Russia without fear of arrest
It would be far easier on them to turn up and get the evidence put before a court (and their lawyers) and be found innocent - unless of course they are guilty
 
Russians have very different sense of fear, but I very doubt that the slush was the only reason for their choice. But it is their own business - what objects to visit, and how early start to drink. They were not under interrogation, so only what is important, that they said: "We didn't poison Skripals". Their word against baseless British word: "They did it!"
They wanted to visit the cathedral and stonehenge
The Stonehenge bus was cancelled due to the roads outside of the city so that put paid to that
But it was the invisible snow on Salisbury’s streets that stopped them from seeing the cathedral

The worst of Salisbury’s snow did not put off a teenager - the melted snow on the edge of pavements put paid to the plans of two burly fitness businessmen
 
@Grey Fox

For accuracy.
I have to say the Russians in Afghanistan seemed to suffer the exact same fears as any other troops, and much of this is documented on video as well as photos.
Perhaps you would like me to post up pics of Russians before and at the moment they were killed so you can make childish excuses and pretend yet again that Russians are totally different to other people.
Let me know ;)
 
May be, thay have other problems exept sending photos to RT. Anyway, it proves nothing, and what is more important - they dont need to prove their innocence.
By the way, can they file civil suit in British court against HMG, about violation of their business reputation, without personal visiting of UK?
LOL. Of course they do! If they had the images that they promised they would have been provided to RT within days of that interview. It would have backed up their case that they were just tourists. What "business reputation"? You are clueless. Think about it? Think of all the international clients that they would have and yet not one of them has come forward to spill the beans on these "sport fitness/nutritionists"? Think of the money that these clients and contacts can make from the media detailing the contact that they had with these two? They have no business. If you believe that they do then you are a gullible fool.

The pair were offered up to 1 million dollars by NBC for that exclusive interview and yet they went to RT. Really? Seriously? Their international business dealings in tatters and they turn down up to a million dollars. Of course they do!

The bidding had been intense. Both the BBC and Channel 4 had put up six-figure offers, which had then been topped by NBC slamming $1m on the table.

Skripal suspects display impressive command of Wikipedia | John Crace
 
May be, thay have other problems exept sending photos to RT. Anyway, it proves nothing, and what is more important - they dont need to prove their innocence.
By the way, can they file civil suit in British court against HMG, about violation of their business reputation, without personal visiting of UK?
Remind us what the name of their business is again?
 
They have a few problems, such as the whole world thinking they are murderers
Really not. Even your closest allies in NATO are in doubts. Jews, Arabs, Indians, Chines and Japans are having fun from baseless British hysteria.

They don’t have to prove their innocence, the prosecution has to prove guilt
But mud sticks. The entire world thinks they are killers, they cannot leave Russia without fear of arrest
Really not. There are very big difference between "they can not leave Russia" and "they can not visit NATO countries".

It would be far easier on them to turn up and get the evidence put before a court (and their lawyers) and be found innocent - unless of course they are guilty
We see, what kind of "investigators" are Brits, and everybody sure that their "judges" are not better. No one believes in the "British justice".
 
User 184461 is a unpaid Russian Troll, treat accordingly.

Guns


184461
Would you like to see any of the stills or video of the pair of GRU operatives from:

Commercial premises CCTV.
Retail premises CCTV (different footage to the ones you posted).
Domestic household CCTV.
Yadda, yadda....
Maybe at a later date.
Right now I'd settle for some of the 5k+ hours of publicly-paid-for CCTV that plod has admitted to having since the FOIA, concerning Salisbury's CCTV system being up and running, was answered.
Particularly between midday and 17h00 on 04/03/18.

You would have thought the plod would have been asking for any/all local footage from the public via a
tv/media campaign.
Gov/plod appeared not to have the first scooby almost 2mths after the event even though they've been solely blaming the Ru state since day1.



The complete lack of advertising for witnesses/cctv at the time, the complete lack of a SR on any particular suspected players.
They could have done a good 'crimewatch', although....

BBC Crimewatch Reconstruction of Salisbury Poisonings Shelved After Director Gives up and Considers New Career



Just something to add some substance to the rumour-control you're all obsessing over.

No, we are not saying there are no cameras in or around the Skripal house. Just that Salisbuys CCTV is not there to look at and around the house, and that the footage is not there for your entertainment. You will have to wait either for (1) the case to go to court or (2) for the incident to become a historic event.
You're very inquisitive about any evidence showing the faces of your tourists at the front door.(Aren't you?)

Perhaps, as you have attempted to tell us, that every single house on the A36 & A360, and in the cul-de-sac has footage.
The CPS are satisfied that there is sufficient evidence to arrest and interview the two tourists.
None of us know anything.
Things have been purposefully made complicated as is often the case.
Only a few know up from down and they aren't going to on this site spilling their guts.

It should be a foregone conclusion that SS in his MI6 safe house/ cul de sac home should have had a small CCTV system at very least but we've never had it confirmed.
They have neither confirmed nor denied
Putin has also neither confirmed nor denied whether he has lost control of novichock stocks
You mean confirmed or denied for the NA that can-be-made and has-been-made all over the planet for the last 20yrs?
That's probably because he's still laughing at the uk.

Blah wibble.
Russia guilty as sin.
Maybe you can give another reason why two known GRU agents were wandering around Salisbury at the same time as a GRU traitor was poisoned with a Russian developed NA?

What's that? You can't?
Well shut the **** up then.
Put your money where your gaping-wide gob is.

Put up a list of all evidence, as far as you're still concerned.
I asked you ages ago but you deflected away on to The Powerpuff Girls and unicorns.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really not. Even your closest allies in NATO are in doubts. Jews, Arabs, Indians, Chines and Japans are having fun from baseless British hysteria.


Really not. There are very big difference between "they can not leave Russia" and "they can not visit NATO countries".


We see, what kind of "investigators" are Brits, and everybody sure that their "judges" are not better. No one believes in the "British justice".
You don't find it strange that the whole world supports the UK version of events in Salisbury and not a single nation has come out to support Russia? Proper perspective is often difficult for self-confessed rapists such as yourself though.
 
Not forgetting this classic that nobody has ever offered a plausible explanation.

At least the 2 'GRU' blokes take the focus off this particular angle of the official-story.

But how were they supposed to have invisibly 'smeared NA (VX x6-9 ) on this door with no ressie/suit/gloves etc without being seen in broad daylight in a cul-de-sac and livede to tell the tale?????

 
Last edited:
You don't find it strange that the whole world supports the UK version of events in Salisbury and not a single nation has come out to support Russia? Proper perspective is often difficult for self-confessed rapists such as yourself though.
The west has deeper pockets.
 
And in trying to prove your point, you use a photograph of a mass produced product with a generic applicator. Are all nozzles bespoke in Russia.

You nozzleist.

Your arguments, as your cover story are becoming comically obtuse. Get another job.
In such a serious case any detail is important. The nozzle is a superimportant detail.
 
Really not. Even your closest allies in NATO are in doubts. Jews, Arabs, Indians, Chines and Japans are having fun from baseless British hysteria.


Really not. There are very big difference between "they can not leave Russia" and "they can not visit NATO countries".


We see, what kind of "investigators" are Brits, and everybody sure that their "judges" are not better. No one believes in the "British justice".
Let them try it and see if they end up being arrested
 
Not forgetting this classic that nobody has ever offered a plausible explanation.

At least the 2 'GRU' blokes take the focus off this particular angle of the official-story.

But how were they supposed to have invisibly 'smeared NA (VX x6-9 ) on this door with no ressie/suit/gloves etc without being seen in broad daylight in a cul-de-sac and livede to tell the tale?????

Have you read the words in your picture?
Photo taken soon after the poisoning
Most recent British account

When was the cul de sac open and when was it closed for the media to gain access and take a photo?
When did it become apparant that novichock was on the door?

A policeman did get affected (and another to less of a degree
Why did he get affected?



Do you think they would have been noticed more or less wearing respirators etc?
Perhaps they used a bottle with a long nozzle
Perhaps they brought a doctor in case things went wrong
 
User 184461 is a unpaid Russian Troll, treat accordingly.

Guns



Maybe at a later date.
Right now I'd settle for some of the 5k+ hours of publicly-paid-for CCTV that plod has admitted to having since the FOIA, concerning Salisbury's CCTV system being up and running, was answered.
Particularly between midday and 17h00 on 04/03/18.

You would have thought the plod would have been asking for any/all local footage from the public via a
tv/media campaign.
Gov/plod appeared not to have the first scooby almost 2mths after the event even though they've been solely blaming the Ru state since day1.



The complete lack of advertising for witnesses/cctv at the time, the complete lack of a SR on any particular suspected players.
They could have done a good 'crimewatch', although....

BBC Crimewatch Reconstruction of Salisbury Poisonings Shelved After Director Gives up and Considers New Career



Just something to add some substance to the rumour-control you're all obsessing over.


None of us know anything.
Things have been purposefully made complicated as is often the case.
Only a few know up from down and they aren't going to on this site spilling their guts.

It should be a foregone conclusion that SS in his MI6 safe house/ cul de sac home should have had a small CCTV system at very least but we've never had it confirmed.


You mean confirmed or denied for the NA that can-be-made and has-been-made all over the planet for the last 20yrs?
That's probably because he's still laughing at the uk.


Put your money where your gaping-wide gob is.

Put up a list of all evidence, as far as you're still concerned.
I asked you ages ago but you deflected away on to The Powerpuff Girls and unicorns.
Is Putin laughing because he has lost diplomatic positions / spies across the world?
Or is he laughing because he can do this then just smirk and deny ?
 

Similar threads

Top