Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Amazon
eBay
Navy Net
Menu
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Featured threads
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New reviews
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
Test
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
Book Reviews
Latest reviews
Search reviews
ARRSEPedia
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Help ARRSE
Amazon Referral
Ebay Referral
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Featured threads
Search forums
Forums
QM's - Military Equipment
Tanks, planes & ships
Russian Atomic Powered Intercontinental Nuclear Torpedo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Effendi, post: 11275081, member: 48193"] I have been aboard a [S]Sov[/S] Russian sub and a US sub of similar vintage. The Rooski one looked like a rusty metal tube, filled with rusty Steampunk technology waiting to be taken to the dump, the US one was shiny, well made and looked like it could put to sea at a moments notice - even though de-commissioned. I'm not saying that they are not scary, and that they will not pass all the countermeasures. I would think though that if these are long term deployed on the seabed awaiting launch instruction that a few of them will do not much more than sputter a short distance - stealthily. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
QM's - Military Equipment
Tanks, planes & ships
Russian Atomic Powered Intercontinental Nuclear Torpedo
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
What's new
Log in
Register
Search
Top
