The dear lord knows there are many rugby correspondents in the owrld and most are middle of the road. Largely unobjectionable. Some on the other hand are quite superlative, such as Steven Jones or Paul Ackford. There is no need to have played at the highest levels to be a good judge of a rugby match - Eddy Butler proves that for sure. Similarly the most opionated correspondents are not necessarily who you want to hear the opinions off - Brian Moore can often be found in this group writing and always in this group commentating. A few however are truly sh1te and I am now going to name and shame. This afternoon I was looking at the description of the quins Bath match on Saturday in my wife's Daily comic...erm...Mail. I watched the game, for most of the second half on the edge of my seat. It wasn't a classic but like last week's Bath vLeicester game it was good VFM. If you understand the principles of rugby, can admire strong "D" and appreciate the use of a ascrum as an attacking weapon and as a device of attrition. Good line-outs too. So apparently I watched a dull affair which consisted merely of two tries. Moreover those at the ground were tuned to "Strictly" in their boxes and left unimpressed. Well that isn't what my former clubmates at the Stoop were saying when the ecstatic fazes came in at 81 minutes. Nor indeed at half time. Moreover the Bath fans I spoke to in the local on sunday admitted it had been a thrilling encounter full of thud and blunder but it had still kept them engaged throughout. So step up Chris Foy - if you're a rugby correspondent, then I am Adolf Hitler's love child!