Royal Family - all threads here please

#1
I take it you're a civvie then or everything stated in your attestation was clearly disregarded and thrown out of the window.

Ya Bloody heathen.

God Save the Queen.
 
#3
Yes, fetch me my republican bashing stick at once LB :twisted:
 
#4
Landie_Bashir said:
I take it you're a civvie then or everything stated in your attestation was clearly disregarded and thrown out of the window.

Ya Bloody heathen.

God Save the Queen.
Heathen? well when i took my attestation, I AFFIRMED !

Where in my post have i slagged off the Queen, who I greatly admire, and will fight to defend.

In my attestation it states quite clearly heirs and successors[/i].

Now this may be Charles, and it may not as we cant foretell the future. I rather doubt it but if he does then Ill carry out my duties just the same.

There is nothing in my attestation that stops me from having opinion that he is unfit to be a successor, or that we should as a nation change the succession/monarch. Which we have done on numerous occassions, WHO WE CAN THEN GIVE UNQUESTIONING LOYALTY TO,

by the way, why shouldnt a republican be able to serve his country anyway? Im not, but am fast being persuaded.

And it ill behoves you to call me a civvy just because I think Charles is a nonce.
 
#5
Good God, don't tell Flasheart that Charlie might be homosexual, he'll be putting him on his list of 'people to visit'! :roll:




Flashy, I loves yer really! :p
 
#6
First post deleted. Step too far. Reasons:

Nature of users on the site, oaths etc mean that royal abusing is generally going to be extremely sensitive.

British press not reporting accusations like this which are very controversial.

I don't want ARRSE used as an underground royal slagging forum.

Out of interest I'm not particularly pro-Royal family, but still think that this sort of thing has no place here.
 
#9
a step too far in this Naafi forum? nature of users?eh? so its ok to slag off poofs on ARSSE(which im not disagreeeing with) but only as long as they aint royal/politicians/some other senior bod ???

i read the rules on joining, it says dont go in if you are offended.

perhaps some are more equal than others?

i could understand it if it was for legal reasons. But since i know my ground and nothing ive posted on is actually libellous or slanderous(you cant libel the dead..and ive not accused anyone living of anything in concrete terms...merely asked questions).
 
E

ex-dvr

Guest
#10
You ever been on this site before stix?
and it's the CO's site so they play to their rules as we all have to end of! :D
 
#11
Clearly a deep division has developed between the COs - told you it was controversial. I'll change my name to Loyal CO I think and wait for my MBE.
 
#12
i have been reading posts for some time. I registered today.

fair enough moderators have to take a point of view.nothing wrong with that. but you get the impression that this NAAFI forum is an anything goes discussion, no topics off limits, just like you would discuss in the bar, but not necessarily in the mess, over dinner...

perhaps the mods will explain to new users then, that really the Naafi does have some topics not to be discussed, and advertise that.

anyone searching to find the truth will not get very far reading british press(i couldnt quite believe that was given as a reason for pulling my post)

so try the german media instead, you might need this if you arent fluent in Deutsch.

http://ets.freetranslation.com/
 
#14
This isnt the officers mess, and we arent drinking pims.....or is it pimms??......this is the naffi !!!so drink up and tell the truth. The rules say , ' easily offended........' etc etc.....well we arent. So say it the way it is. we all work and fight for the Queen.....(attention.....salute). But we hold no loyalty to Charles, especially now hes a donkey raping shit eater.
p.s. God save the queen.
please take this in the manner its meant. :)
 
#15
God! I've got to stop posting when I get back from the pub. All will be revealed tomorrow, say the MoS people.
 
#16
Guys and Girls

Perhaps it would be better to go Weapons free, once these allegations have been cleared for publication by the UK courts?

Arrse, even though an Internet publication, is still a publication. As such, it is still subject to scrutiny by the Legal team at Clarence House.

Sure as God made little Green Apples, someone who knows HRH the Heir reads this site, and I don't think we want the unwelcome attention right now.

So please, just for the time being, engage brain before fingers... :wink:
 

X-Inf

War Hero
Book Reviewer
#17
I agree with PTP - this is a quick way to get a site shut down.

However, it is difficult to pontificate when ARRSE are running a poll on this very subject :!: :!: :!: :!:
 
#18
All this cr@p is good news for Bliar I think, preparing ground for a big diversionary "Republic Debate" should Hutton or the Euro Constitution cause him trouble.
 
#19
Bladensburg said:
All this cr@p is good news for Bliar I think, preparing ground for a big diversionary "Republic Debate" should Hutton or the Euro Constitution cause him trouble.
Bloody Guardian reading cads the lot of them. Seems though a rather dead Diana had something to do with it. Why cant she just remain dead and not pass comment anymore. Harumph.
 

Mr Happy

LE
Moderator
#20
If it was up to me. And, until such time they make a movie about it, it won't be I wouldn't have such slander (if that is the technical definition of whatever is being written or not - I haven't seen anything) anywhere.

I'm sick to death of some actor from some show somewhere being outed, or found dating Britney (she still is a virgin you know, she's waiting for me) or no longer dating Josh Hairnet or whatever. Come the revolution the journalists of the Sun et al will all be the first up against the wall.

Sure, if it was illegal then it's news, if it's somebodies preferences or personal life then it shouldn't be in the public forum.

And I'd even let the bastard politicians off.

Mr H
 

Similar threads

Latest Threads

Top