Ooops. Another one. Strangely Auntie does not identify the political party to which the gentleman belongs. Could this be fear of the wrath of St Jezza, or release of the Kiddyfiddlerfinder general fatboy Watson?
Or lied, obfuscated and clung on until the last possible moment if you prefer.
The LibDem bloke who was leader of the council for a while when Labour was not in power for fares better, but not much and then only because there was not the evidence to show he had actually lied, merely blamed others for his own manifest failings and inaction.
Not when I posted it didn't., but hey-ho maybe they realised they were being a tad disingenuous. Still no outrage from the KiddyFiddlerFinder General though. Had this been a Tory you wouldn't have found a TV channel in the country without the blubbery mass demanding blood.
The people who looked the other way, either through laziness or lack of courage, or worse still for political gain, should be brought to account in public. I wonder if Tom Watson's fury is unconsciously an effort to stop people looking too hard at Labour authorities?
A complex web of more than 900 "county lines" have been discovered across the UK, where organised crime groups based in urban areas use violence and intimidation to force young and vulnerable people to sell drugs remotely in rural or seaside areas.
Further investigations produced suggestions that children as young as eight are being sucked into a world of drug dealing where gangs use torture as a means of asserting their authority, and knives, Tasers, boiling water and acid as weapons
Why are all these failed human beings who looked the other way not looking at prosecution for Misconduct In Public Office followed by very severe sentences? If we need more prisons, build more prisons. If we need prison ships - who cares the criminals find them unpleasant. Society needs to send a very heavy message. If people need coercing by the law to do the decent thing, then so be it.
They'd have to be indicted, won't happen if the CPS and police undermine evidence or don't investigate. In the Public Sector and political classes, their 'decent' behaviour conforms to their own learned and accepted standards of morality and respectability, such as they are.
They've had to be kicked out of their entrenched foul attitudes or collusion, but if the chummy Public Sector family is still blocking public inquiries with people ordered to attend, and can't countenance the ignominy of issues that would implicate other parts of the Public Sector: they're protecting their own. That's before we get on to toothless associations and regulators or what Sir Bernard Woolley called 'masterly inactivity' in government.
Since you mentioned it, have an answer. Nothing new, and not really the point, and who is doing it is not the point either. But not many honest people would disagree with your "it's not just working-class/ muslims". Some people have other ideas, such as we've had a morally degenerate Public Sector, negligent 'guardians', and a chattering Liberati class that seems to have believed for decades that children can consent. Rapes, beatings and child slavery were "consensual". School kids and vulnerable adults were sacrificed, raped and beaten for the sake of cultural harmony, idleness or cost-cutting.
They can't deny it because we've had the inquiries, and central government has said so. Blind ignorance, protecting reputations and careers rather than a generation of kids when their stupidly dangerous experiments went wrong. It's all there if you look for it. Especially with that class of people he's talking about in your video - you're on the button with your post. We've had people (arrseholes) either frightened of or opposed to tackling habitual sex offenders and vicious criminals who were literally untouchable, or ignored.
Apparently, gangs are running riot all over this land as well, using any derelict building or obliging hostel they can find. But suddenly "attitudes and understanding have changed". When an entire system of government and the PC masses get caught out feeding this cancer that's spread like wildfire, they plead ignorance. No balls and no moral compass, see?
Some of these criminals are delinquent medieval retards, some are eastern, western or westernised. And if elderly pervs have opened their homes to child abuse, violent trafficking and beatings, they're not all rogue criminal elements skipping in and out. Some have been living in communities here, and were probably overlooked.
You brought it up, and whether you understand or agree, there's no justification for any of it. And you might consider how close to a classic banana republic we've become.
Blind ignorance, protecting reputations and careers rather than a generation of kids when their stupidly dangerous experiments went wrong. It's all there if you look for it. Especially with that class of people he's talking about in your video - you're on the button with your post. We've had people (arrseholes) either frightened of or opposed to tackling habitual sex offenders and vicious criminals who were literally untouchable, or ignored.
'A police chief has been accused of performing a spectacular u-turn by failing to initiate a public inquiry into the controversial investigation of Sir Edward Heath.
Angus Macpherson, Wiltshire’s police and crime commissioner (PCC), has repeatedly acknowledged the need for an inquiry amid claims that the force’s findings on historical child sex abuse allegations were uncorroborated and failed to justify the time and expense officers were afforded.
But he refused to fund it, according to Sir Edward's supporters, despite confirmation from the Home Office that he has the power to do so.
Lincoln Seligman, the former Prime Minister’s godson, said his reputation must be restored by a judge-led inquiry.'
@184461 We've got grooming gangs and organised-drugs-and-sex trafficking. We have had as the PM said: 'institutionalised political correctness turning a blind eye'. They seem to be priorities. Also 'unauthorised removals of information from offices' and 'probable corruption in the Public Sector'. So, either Heath and Savile or the ongoing nationwide brutalisation and enslavement of children?
'Race, ethnicity or community relations should not be used as an excuse not to investigate and punish sex offenders' (Yvette Cooper). And more women in offending communities are conceding there's a problem.
On your point: position and power shouldn't prevent inquiries either but a level playing field, more honesty and transparency are overdue. You might have misunderstood my post and 'racism' doesn't come into it. Victims in ethnic minorities and indigenous white criminals are also involved.
Rotherham is now a byword for crimes against UK minors and vulnerable people, trafficking and brutality, also misconduct and systemic corruption in the biggest ever child abuse scandal. Executives have publicly admitted failures extending nationwide. There's no argument, no defence, and against the inquiries, official statements and corroborations: Heath and Savile are smallfry. Expect Telford to be in the news again soon.