If this is true, itâs just another step towards the country going completely stark bark raving mad. A case of Celebrityitus.
The 'heroes' of todayâs mulch fed, TV goggling, dumded down population are these types of underachieving 'actor luvvie bottom touchers'.
Popularity in the form of familiarity.
Nothing whatsoever to do with them actually being able to lead. Celebs need a reality pill. Itâs bad enough some third rate Z list soap star thinking they can sing but for them to actually think they have the qualities to be in a position to lead and make decisions greater than what fcuking chat show they are going to appear on. Having said that, most of these cretins are the result of this current crop of under qualified union leaders we call a poor excuse of a Government. They have shown you can be in a position to 'lead' a country with nothing more than a jacket thrown nonchalantly over the back of a chair and a grin that a syphilitic village idiot would be proud of.
SOMEONE TELL 'GWANT' HES A TOOL AND HE ONLY PRETENDS FOR A CNUTING LIVING!! ..........................(Over qualified then).
He (Kemp) very nearly stood for Colchester in 2001 - the Labour candidate had a minor disagreement with a member of the local constabulary (drove into him and later convicted of dangerous driving), and stood down and Kemp was (briefly) mentioned as a distinct possibility. I believe some of the local electorate expressed distinctly negative views and the idea was quietly dropped.
(Would Blair would feel obliged to offer one of the MoD junior minister posts to someone with Kemp's extensive knowledge of the SF....?)
why not replace the whole shower with actors
they could act sincere and like they knew what they were doing
more people would be likly to vote so they'd have at least some sort of madate
and nobody would mistake them for people of some importance reagan did'nt do too badly and he was mostly asleep