I am currently in the process of buying a repossessed property. However, now it has come down to it, it would appear the muppets never actually repossessed the whole of the property! There is a flying freehold of an airing cupboard and on the title this is pointed out as being "first floor rooms only". However, Muppets Inc, seem to have misread this as the title being first floor rooms only! It clearly states that this is a freehold property on the title and obviously there is no external access to the first floor. My question is, if the vendors solicitors keep refusing to change the contract then the sale will not proceed, will I have sufficient evidence to reclaim all my expenses occured to date? My solicitor says yes but it will cost me to prosecute as Muppets Inc will just continue to be unhelpful as they are currently. As far as I am concerned this would be a misrepresentation of sale and I should be entitled to my money back. I wont be able to afford to take them to court should that be my only option. All advice gratefully received.