Reports Done, Guesses When Blinkett's Back

#1
So he helped the nanny (Hmmm - isn't it a perk that you can use some aspect of job to help your 'mate'? Maybe he went too far), took the rail tickets (which he's now paid for) and got caught up in Quinn's shag-me-a-baby scheme. I still reckon it would be months - especially when Labour wins (unfortunately) the upcoming elections. Bliar isn't gonna see his mate on backbenders despite the report findings (like we couldn't have guess it anyway). But when he's back, Prescott's on the dole. Or Culture Secretary lol.

LONDON (Reuters) - Former Home Secretary David Blunkett, who quit in tears last week, intervened in a visa application for his ex-lover's nanny despite his denials, an inquiry has found.

But the probe concluded it was unclear whether former Blunkett meant to act improperly, leaving an opening for Prime Minister Tony Blair to rehabilitate one of his most popular lieutenants.

Conservative critics said the report showed Blair ran a "grubby" government, making clear they intend to exploit the case in the run-up to an election expected next year.

When Blunkett quit last week, Blair lavished him with praise, saying he had left with his integrity intact.

Blunkett, 57, had denied abusing his office by giving special help to get a UK residence visa more quickly for Filipina Leoncia Casalme, who worked as a nanny for his married lover Kimberly Quinn.

But Sir Alan Budd said on Tuesday his inquiry had uncovered an unmistakable trail of e-mails and faxes that showed Blunkett's staff had raised the nanny's case, and that her visa was speeded up by months as a result.

"I believe I have been able to establish a chain of events linking Mr Blunkett to the change in the decision on Ms Casalme's application ..," he wrote.

A separate inquiry found that Blunkett, who is divorced, had improperly given Quinn free train tickets available for the spouses or monogamous partners of members of parliament.

Blunkett had already apologised over the tickets and repaid their cost, and unlike the case of the nanny's visa that was not seen as a sacking offence.

Blunkett said he accepted Budd's conclusions, and that his own recollection of the events had proven to be wrong.

Budd said it was Blunkett's habit to point out particular cases to check up on the civil service, and that he may not have meant to direct improper action to be taken.

"I believe there are two broad possibilities: Mr Blunkett was seeking special help for Mrs Quinn's nanny, or he was raising the case as an example of the poor performance of the IND (Immigration and Naturalisation Directorate)," he wrote.

"I do not have direct evidence that allows me to chose between the two possibilities."

The case creates a dilemma for Blair, who could bring Blunkett back after next year's expected victory.

Blunkett, who reached the top of politics despite being born poor and blind, has long been an asset. He was one of the most popular figures in government for his tough law-and-order policies and widely admired personal struggle.

The Economist magazine wrote of the "nagging suspicion, shared even by those who detest his authoritarian tendencies, that he is a great man." Polls show the public wants him back.

But Conservative opponents called for a new probe headed by a judge with the power to compel people to testify.

"Mr Blair's grubby culture of spin and lies has gone far enough," Conservative leader Michael Howard said. "I think there's a gaping hole at the heart of this report. There are still questions to be answered."
 

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
#2
MyssL said:
......

But when he's back, Prescott's on the dole. Or Culture Secretary lol.

Eh ? Isn't yoghourt covered by MAFF ?




(Yeah, I know it's got a new name, but it's still populated by cretins)
 
#3
DEFRA - "Department for the Eradication of Farming and Rural Activities"
 
#5
Due to there being no serious opposition Labour will win the next election, cnuts. At that point BLiar will appoint his new cabinet which will include Blinkett, the Chick Magnet.
 
#6
I reckon the speeded up visa was okay, it's the theft of taxpayers money I'm angry about. It ain't enough he's a powerful rich politician and she's a wealthy socialite (and daughter of a millionaire) piece of filth, it's the fact that he issues her FREE (i.e. stolen from the taxpayer) FIRST-CLASS rail tickets). Apparently they're a freebie for MPs' spouses and partners. To get first class tickets in the military you need to be a Major or above travelling on duty - if you're the partner of an MP you get them buckshee as a matter of course! Absolutely shocking.

Not only that, she is a hell of a lot richer than the vast majority of the country. She could have got free transport off any of her vast army of sexual partners - why did Blind Pugh insist on allowing the taxpaper to pay for the slut's travel? He seems totally oblivous to the fact that he was nobbing a married woman and refuses to accept that he was wrong. For such an intelligent man, has he never heard of contraception?

But SHE on the other hand is just a selfish, nasty, conniving scum-of-the-earth slut. Shagging every man she meets to get some perk. Meanwhile her husband is cuckolded fool - and I bet you she sues the arse off him when they split up. Just cos she has money doesn't make her any less of a spunkbucket. If she was on a council estate she'd be chavscum with hoop earrings, clown locket, shellsuit and a pramfull of kids by different dads!

But I don't really feel strongly about it either way :wink:
 

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
#7
PoisonDwarf said:
......

For such an intelligent man, has he never heard of contraception?

......
While I detest the self-righteous tw@t, he probably has thought of contraception, but as she wanted a sprog off him she just twanged a rubber band around his dick and told him it was a johnny.
 
#8
PoisonDwarf said:
He seems totally oblivous to the fact that he was nobbing a married woman and refuses to accept that he was wrong.
Unf its pretty norm these days. Check any sunday's tabloid for the next slapper's spread of her conquest. Worse still - the ones that come in the papers to say it was a worthless sh*g. Who's looks the bigger idiot?! And its seems Quinn's big mouth have backfired on her 'n' all - not for the first time either....

Cutaway said:
While I detest the self-righteous tw@t, he probably has thought of contraception, but as she wanted a sprog off him she just twanged a rubber band around his dick and told him it was a johnny.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

or just like the feeling of tapping his other stick :roll: :roll:
 

Similar threads


Latest Threads

Top