Rees-Mogg: Traitor, Hero or Muppet?

JRM 1/ Traitor, 2/ Hero, 3/ Muppet

  • 1. Traitor

    Votes: 21 6.6%
  • 2. Hero

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • 3. Muppet

    Votes: 91 28.6%
  • 4. A very nice chap doing his best for the country

    Votes: 155 48.7%

  • Total voters
    318
His voting record worries me a tad.

IIRC he voted against unaccompanied child refugees ( and yes, I acknowledge there were some fakes ) being allowed into the U.K. which as he claims to be a practicing catholic, I wonder what his friend Jesus would have said about that.
How dare he.



Won't someone think of these poor little children?!
 
A quick couple of examples off the top of my head.

Two young men with their tongues down each others throats - EastEnders, BBC, prime time Tele.
"Dad, why is that man kissing the other man ?"
Yes, you can turn it off. But it's too late then, it has been brought into your home and seen and now has to be explained to the kids.

Listen to the words of Your Gorgeous, played almost daily.
A thinly disguised song about one bloke ******* another on the bonnet of a car.
BBC Radio 1, 2 and probably others.
The BBC are quick to censor the lyrics of songs they disagree with, though.
 
He's a trenchant Roman Catholic. You'll never catch him out in a lie because he won't ever lie; it's one of the biggest no-nos for the true left-footers.

Now fcek off and tell us some more about something you have no knowledge nor experience of.
Why didn't he redact the awful Sun article he shared on Twitter to his 1000s of followers, about how much cheaper things would be after Brexit, after it was withdrawn by the Sun? I would expect a man of principal to own up to that straight away.

I've also heard him on LBC. He rubbished the opinion of some agency because they get funding from the EU. A caller pointed out the funding amounted to around 2 percent of the agencies budget, and JRM over-talked the caller with "thanks for agreeing they receive EU funding" and then cut them off. Disingenuous at the most, and certainly not the premise of argument you would expect from someone who studied Classics either.
 
Last edited:

skid2

LE
Book Reviewer
The UK as a whole is leaving the European Union.
One would assume that posting gen, (or in this case disinformation,) would cover the whole of the UK unless otherwise caveated.
Your post only covered what you know of your area, while purporting otherwise.
Mine mentioned England because that is where he comes from.
At present I have no information on the other countries.
Whether it is representative of the whole of England I don't know, but next time we meet I'll ask the loc and if it was an anomaly.


It's neither a simple fact nor a complicated one, it's true only for a certain area not the UK as was implied.
The only part of the post in question which is wrong is this:

So most of it.
I never implied anything. I simply explained how it was. And as that was a fact. Easily verified by a text, it became a simple fact. That doesn’t change anything.
 

skid2

LE
Book Reviewer
Agreed except for excuses. You'll hear plenty of them. What you won't get is an explanation about there incompetence.
Easy, it’s Europe’s, Ireland’s, remainers, or the Downing Street cats fault.
Pick as oppropriate.

Throughout this whole process I’ve been positive, positive that the whole brexit things a stupid idea. And lo and behold.
 
Today at 08:52 (my time zone)
Even assuming he was too busy pontificating serious thinkings, like should we have one eu timezone?

Which is crap. That was never on the table. The only bit was should the clocks, in different time zones, go back and fore in Spring and Autumn.

The people I've heard go on about this over the years on the whole work in an office. Instead of trying to get us to work around their preferred hours, why don't they change the clocks in their offices and work accordingly? Instead of 9 to 5, 8 to 4, 7 to 3 etc.
 

skid2

LE
Book Reviewer
Attended in small numbers, but as someone educated to be a member of the Presbyterian middle class of Ulster you know their place and make sure they know their place. Women? Just Taigs with tits to a Methody boy.
Go away you’ll have me murdered in my bed with talk like that. (Methody has been Co Ed for a while)
 
And there you'd be wrong.
Theres an English ouen in the local shellhole who sacked Latin at school and he's fifty or fifty-one.



Edit.
By English I mean he grew up and went to school in England, rather than it being his first language.

Did two years of Latin in a kak govt school in SA in the late '70s.
 

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
I never implied anything. I simply explained how it was. And as that was a fact. Easily verified by a text, it became a simple fact. That doesn’t change anything.
What doesn't change anything, your omission ?

Latin was gone in schools long before the eec reared it’s ugly head in the 70s
Obviously incorrect.

I’m sixty and only people who needed it for work, learned Latin and not in school.
I take your word that you're sixty years old, but the rest is untrue.

Those who were taught it as part of the everyday school curriculum would be a different and probably dead generation.
Fifty years of age might possibly be regarded as a different generation to people of sixty, but a younger one.
And sorry, but he's defied being dead too.
So that quote wasn't particularly correct either.

All for the UK as a whole of course, as barring a Russian first strike on support of the SNP, that's how the exit from the European Union will take place.
 

Cutaway

LE
Kit Reviewer
Listen to the words of Your Gorgeous, played almost daily.
A thinly disguised song about one bloke ******* another on the bonnet of a car.
BBC Radio 1, 2 and probably others.
1. It’s not played almost daily.

2. The singer is singing the song from a female perspective, it’s a song about a young girl having pornographic photos taken of her by her photographer ‘boyfriend’ who she’s in love with while he’s sharing/selling the pics. It’s not even remotely about gay sex.
 
1. It’s not played almost daily.

2. The singer is singing the song from a female perspective, it’s a song about a young girl having pornographic photos taken of her by her photographer ‘boyfriend’ who she’s in love with while he’s sharing/selling the pics. It’s not even remotely about gay sex.
It's sung by a bloke.
Thinly disguised, as I said above.
 
There are a range of thoughts from when life begins. From the moment of conception to the moment of birth, and all sorts of times in between.

JRM is of the belief that life begins at conception and that every life is sacred.

This forms the basis for his stance on abortion.
As can be seen on this previously unseen CCTV footage filmed in JR-M’s house.

 

Similar threads


Latest Threads

Top