Reduction in X factor for useless fat cnuts

Remove X factor?

  • Yes remove it, useless cnuts

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No let them chill out in Blighty on the same wage

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Shoot the fcukers ;-)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
#1
Was having a 'heated' debate the other day and this loomed its head. In the present climate of continuous Op Tours, what do you think of the suggestion. Should unfit to deploy personnel have their wages reduced, ie remove X factor? After all the X factor is apparently added due to the risky and extreme nature of our Jobs. If you are a fat useless cnut who cant pass a PFT or CFT and can't deploy, should it be removed?
 
#2
This argument has been done to death. As usual, you havent considered the unfortunate people who may not be able to deploy due to being injured on a previouse deployment. Should they have their wages docked because of that?

What if they develop a degenerative illness through no fault of their own. Going to dock their wages too?
 
#3
Get your point mate, but I reckon if their scoffing pies and drinking wobbly back in Germany/UK on rear party then they wont get their Operational Bonus. I think thats a fair way of looking at it, as theres always blokes on rear party who want to be at the front but cant through, injuries, courses, postings etc, Is it fair to make them suffer aswell by putting them in the same catagory as the fat lazy tour dodging wasters
 
#5
drain_sniffer said:
This argument has been done to death. As usual, you havent considered the unfortunate people who may not be able to deploy due to being injured on a previouse deployment. Should they have their wages docked because of that?

What if they develop a degenerative illness through no fault of their own. Going to dock their wages too?
How do you know i haven't considered it? You could get a job on telly with psychic skills like yours fella.
 
#6
Joe_Squad said:
drain_sniffer said:
This argument has been done to death. As usual, you havent considered the unfortunate people who may not be able to deploy due to being injured on a previouse deployment. Should they have their wages docked because of that?

What if they develop a degenerative illness through no fault of their own. Going to dock their wages too?
How do you know i haven't considered it? You could get a job on telly with psychic skills like yours fella.
It might have been better if you had added it to your original post.

Trolling cnut.
 
#7
Ok then, injuries and degenrative illness being the exceptions (as these are unavoidable). If they are just fcukin lazy would it not be an incentive for them to pass their PFT/CFT, the fact that if they didn't then they would lose money?
 
#8
57Chevy said:
Joe_Squad said:
drain_sniffer said:
This argument has been done to death. As usual, you havent considered the unfortunate people who may not be able to deploy due to being injured on a previouse deployment. Should they have their wages docked because of that?

What if they develop a degenerative illness through no fault of their own. Going to dock their wages too?
How do you know i haven't considered it? You could get a job on telly with psychic skills like yours fella.
It might have been better if you had added it to your original post.

Trolling cnut.
Who the fcuk are you to call me a troll knobend? Its a genuine question.
 
G

Goku

Guest
#9
Joe_Squad said:
Ok then, injuries and degenrative illness being the exceptions (as these are unavoidable). If they are just fcukin lazy would it not be an incentive for them to pass their PFT/CFT, the fact that if they didn't then they would lose money?
Wouldn’t it be better to discharge someone like that?
 
#10
Joe_Squad said:
57Chevy said:
Joe_Squad said:
drain_sniffer said:
This argument has been done to death. As usual, you havent considered the unfortunate people who may not be able to deploy due to being injured on a previouse deployment. Should they have their wages docked because of that?

What if they develop a degenerative illness through no fault of their own. Going to dock their wages too?
How do you know i haven't considered it? You could get a job on telly with psychic skills like yours fella.
It might have been better if you had added it to your original post.

Trolling cnut.
Who the fcuk are you to call me a troll knobend? Its a genuine question.
Sigh...Look at your original post. Somewhat inflammatory don't you think. Perhaps if you had started with the words "Apart from people with injuries and degenerative illness's".

Just a thought.
 
#11
Goku said:
Joe_Squad said:
Ok then, injuries and degenrative illness being the exceptions (as these are unavoidable). If they are just fcukin lazy would it not be an incentive for them to pass their PFT/CFT, the fact that if they didn't then they would lose money?
Wouldn’t it be better to discharge someone like that?
Well its an option i suppose, but wouldn't it be better to shoot them. Then we get the benefit of being able to conduct moving target ranges (although slow moving targets) and also conduct ballistic tests on the effects of a burst of 5.56/7.62/.50
 
#12
57Chevy said:
Joe_Squad said:
57Chevy said:
Joe_Squad said:
drain_sniffer said:
This argument has been done to death. As usual, you havent considered the unfortunate people who may not be able to deploy due to being injured on a previouse deployment. Should they have their wages docked because of that?

What if they develop a degenerative illness through no fault of their own. Going to dock their wages too?
How do you know i haven't considered it? You could get a job on telly with psychic skills like yours fella.
It might have been better if you had added it to your original post.

Trolling cnut.
Who the fcuk are you to call me a troll knobend? Its a genuine question.
Sigh...Look at your original post. Somewhat inflammatory don't you think. Perhaps if you had started with the words "Apart from people with injuries and degenerative illness's".
Just a thought.
its the fcukin NAAFI bar mate, its meant to be inflammatory........... If i'd wanted to put the question to the PC brigade i'd have posted it in the Current Affairs section.
 
#13
their unit is to blame as there should be a robust PT programme in place, I have to work hard to pass my PFT (Run part) but if it wasnt for the fact that my Regiment has a good PT programme I might not pass. I am just a shite runner.
 
#14
taffridge said:
their unit is to blame as there should be a robust PT programme in place, I have to work hard to pass my PFT (Run part) but if it wasnt for the fact that my Regiment has a good PT programme I might not pass. I am just a shite runner.
Therein lies the answer mate. YOU have to work hard to pass. People should have the presence of mind to keep themselves fit. If the Regiment hasn't installed a PT programme then its up to the individual to train.
 
#15
The point is with 3 kids its a bit hard to find time to train in my spare time, (I put aside 3 hrs a week) , but with 3 hrs PT added it makes 6 hours which makes all the difference, If I just had the 3 hours in my spare time I would really struggle. And God am I pi$$ed off with tofu
 
#16
OK try this:

Apart from those with injuries and degenerative illness's, do you think that those useless fat cnuts, who can't be arrsed to pass a PFT or CFT, and therefore can't deploy, should have the X factor removed from them?


My answer now, instead of trolling cnut is: They are handy for rear party.

See, everyone's happy now.
 
#17
57Chevy said:
OK try this:

Apart from those with injuries and degenerative illness's, do you think that those useless fat cnuts, who can't be arrsed to pass a PFT or CFT, and therefore can't deploy, should have the X factor removed from them?


My answer now, instead of trolling cnut is: They are handy for rear party.

See, everyone's happy now.
fair one (coz they're on Rear Party anyway due to being lazy cnuts), but Rear Party on less wages....................? :p
 
#18
Being one of those injured people (through no fault of my own) I have had to do a rear party. I would rather put up with 200,000 Iraqi insurgents than have to deal with 200 whining, whinging, bleating wives.

I deserved a bloody medal, and certainly deserved the x-factor
 
#19
57Chevy said:
Being one of those injured people (through no fault of my own) I have had to do a rear party. I would rather put up with 200,000 Iraqi insurgents than have to deal with 200 whining, whinging, bleating wives.

I deserved a bloody medal, and certainly deserved the x-factor
I never said you didn't, I'm saying should the fat feckers who are just plain lazy lose the x-factor....................
 
#20
Again it would add incentive. Rear Party is made up of people with degenerative illness, injuries and plain lazy cnuts. If we removed the X Factor from just the lazy feckers they might get off their fat arrses and try to win it back.......
 

Latest Threads