http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/mid/4464402.stm I thought this was relevant in light of the recent survey on weather or not drunk women are to blame for being sexually assaulted. I donât know if this case is setting or following a trend in the law, but it now appears that the law is laying the blame of rape with the inebriated rightly or wrongly. This case looks like a very dodgy gray area to me. If this girl was so drunk that sheâd passed out and couldnât move or speak then yes, clearly a case of rape. But if she did consent but was just too drunk to remember consenting, then the chap is clearly innocent. Itâs not mentioned by the BBC but the Daly mail has an article on this case in todayâs paper in which she is quoted as saying that she remembers giving a grown of pleasure. Sounds like she enjoyed it at the time. Opinions?