UK or Australia?Rumors the prototypes visited our shores are abound in some circles.
UK or Australia?Rumors the prototypes visited our shores are abound in some circles.
Rumors the prototypes visited our shores are abound in some circles.
Pity MM isnt here, he would probably know if there are any RAF pilots on exchange but wouldn’t the testing still be in house with NG?
Doubt it howver in saying that would not surprise me if some of our liaison personnel with TS ..RAF test pilots or VSO would have a wee glimpse.Rumors the prototypes visited our shores are abound in some circles.
Pity MM isnt here, he would probably know if there are any RAF pilots on exchange but wouldn’t the testing still be in house with NG?
First journalist allowed near the F-117 was a Brit - JDW's Nick Cook.He'd not be able to tell you...
That said, it's a matter of record that the U-2 and F-117 programmes both had RAF personnel involved before the aircraft was known to the public; the MoD refused to admit that we'd had anyone on the U-2 until the CIA released the history of the programme under an FOI a few years ago (up to that point, the MoD had blocked publication of the glossy paperback the DoD/CIA planned to release about the early years of the aircraft's service on the grounds it would reveal our involvement).
Don’t forget also, if we are launching conventional Storm Shadow, how would they know we hadn’t sneaked a nuke one in?
He'd not be able to tell you...
That said, it's a matter of record that the U-2 and F-117 programmes both had RAF personnel involved before the aircraft was known to the public; the MoD refused to admit that we'd had anyone on the U-2 until the CIA released the history of the programme under an FOI a few years ago (up to that point, the MoD had blocked publication of the glossy paperback the DoD/CIA planned to release about the early years of the aircraft's service on the grounds it would reveal our involvement).
Very early in the F177 programme the RAF were asked to send two test pilots from Boscombe Down to write a report on the aircraft, reportedly it was the CO of ETPS and and a McKenna trophy winner Flt Lt Dave Southwood who was on staff there.RAF pilots received awards for operational flying of both the U-2 and F-177
RAF pilots have been embedded in F-22 and B-2 squadrons from the start.
ISWYDTThis F-177...?
Very early in the F177 programme the RAF were asked to send two test pilots from Boscombe Down to write a report on the aircraft, reportedly it was the CO of ETPS and and a McKenna trophy winner Flt Lt Dave Southwood who was on staff there.
Was it because the UK being so small there was really nowhere to 'hide' it unlike places like Tonnopah in the middle of nowheresville.We were offered the F-117 by the Reagan administration in 1986, but turned it down (there are some files about 'Project MOONFLOWER', as it was known, in the Thatcher Archive).
Was it because the UK being so small there was really nowhere to 'hide' it unlike places like Tonnopah in the middle of nowheresville.
Was it because the UK being so small there was really nowhere to 'hide' it unlike places like Tonnopah in the middle of nowheresville.
It wasn’t the CO as per say it was a Sqn Ldr Cruishanks. It was not long after Dave Southwood graduated from ETPS and was featured on BBC1 Test Pilot series every Monday night back in 1987.Very early in the F177 programme the RAF were asked to send two test pilots from Boscombe Down to write a report on the aircraft, reportedly it was the CO of ETPS and and a McKenna trophy winner Flt Lt Dave Southwood who was on staff there.
Genuine question: couldn't we have begged some space at Macrihanish?The sources as to why we rejected it aren't declassified yet, as far as I know...
But it was damned expensive to operate; we'd no idea when we'd be able to admit to having it; we'd no means of hiding it until then - as you suggest - and unless we had a squadron based out in the US alongside the USAF, then the chances of an odd-looking aeroplane in RAF markings being seen by spotters were rather high. I suspect that the cost would'e been first on the list of actual reasons. And second and third, for that matter...
With all the rumours that have gone around for years about the RAF punishment posting and SEAL team 6 were there in the early 70s.Genuine question: couldn't we have begged some space at Macrihanish?
Mysterious triangles and doughnuts on a rope...With all the rumours that have gone around for years about the RAF punishment posting and SEAL team 6 were there in the early 70s.
A lot of the F177 was commercial off the shelf equipment mainly I believe from the F18, but the coatings were the problem. A very difficult aircraft to photograph using an auto-focus lens.The sources as to why we rejected it aren't declassified yet, as far as I know...
But it was damned expensive to operate; we'd no idea when we'd be able to admit to having it; we'd no means of hiding it until then - as you suggest - and unless we had a squadron based out in the US alongside the USAF, then the chances of an odd-looking aeroplane in RAF markings being seen by spotters were rather high. I suspect that the cost would'e been first on the list of actual reasons. And second and third, for that matter...
We sold for a quid around decade and bit ago ...Genuine question: couldn't we have begged some space at Macrihanish?
Something rang a bell about the F-5, so I had a quick Google. Worth a read. A-10 and F-16 get a mention:A lot of the F177 was commercial off the shelf equipment mainly I believe from the F18, but the coatings were the problem. A very difficult aircraft to photograph using an auto-focus lens.