Nooooo. It has nothing to with which service, arm or regiment etc. it has more to do with facile writing that always accompanies these events. Is it that the priority is not high enough for good research etc to take place, or that the people given the job of doing the writing are very average? I know that hundreds of units have now 'come home', and my truly hearty well done goes to every single person in every single one of those units, but the reports have become so asinine that they are meaningless. They do no justice to the personnel involved and just make the whole thing appear unfairly bland.
All of these machine produced articles now say, "Some really good people did some some really good things in support of the good fight in a far away land. By the way it was really dangerous, but British pluck and a chin-up attitude saw them through."
They deserve a whole lot better.
Hence my earlier comment.